Images of neutron bomb explosions: https://images.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=A0LEVripo15V4C0Ah0snnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTByMjB0aG5zBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw--?p=Neutron+Bomb+Explosion&fr=ytff1-yff25&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002.
It fits. So, this begs the question: Didn't the ETs say they were not going to allow detonation of nuclear devices? I'm waiting for the backpedaling on this one.

You need to be a member of Earthchangers College to add comments!

Join Earthchangers College

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Thanks for the details, Morris.  Your joke would be funny, if people weren't really dying.  But that's what they are doing.  So, rather than funny, it is sober truth. 

    So, second neutron bomb in Yemen.  Byron has commented two in Syria.  So, up to four neutron bombs allowed.  Does anyone have a clue if a "small" neutron bomb is outside the range the ETs said they wouldn't allow?  Or have we been lied to again?  Well, time is telling us something.  But what?



    Morris Levin said:

    http://strogosekretno.com/index.php?p=newsroom&nid=2216

    Found this comment about the blast...has the earmarks of a neutron bomb explosion. Seems like the world is doing pest control management. Sorry buildings are temporarily unavailable due to neutron spraying, come back in a week..
  • http://strogosekretno.com/index.php?p=newsroom&nid=2216

    Found this comment about the blast...has the earmarks of a neutron bomb explosion. Seems like the world is doing pest control management. Sorry buildings are temporarily unavailable due to neutron spraying, come back in a week..
  • How fast I wonder.  The person taking the video seemed not too far away during it.  But who knows what happened five minutes after the video ended. 

    Walk&Reflect said:

    Here is an article about the same event from the controversial Gordon Duff:

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/21/358343/

    I'll go out on a limb and make a prediction, that the media comes out and says it was a new type of bunker buster, or a daisy cutter type fuel-air explosive. That seems to be the standard line.

    The fallout below and around this size of neutron bomb explosion is severely intense for a short period, killing off everyone in that radius quickly. The radiation then dissipates rapidly, leaving little evidence of a nuclear strike except for its affect on organic material.  Keep your eyes open for some story about a massacre in Yemen, which would be the cover for the deaths.

  • I knew it was more a people killer than a large-scale destroyer of everything, buildings as well as people.  Would this kind of nuke perhaps not be powerful enough to affect other universes?  I never read anything that distinguishes one type of nuke from another.

    Keith H said:

    This could be considered. Borderline nuke.
    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb
  • Here is an article about the same event from the controversial Gordon Duff:

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/21/358343/

    I'll go out on a limb and make a prediction, that the media comes out and says it was a new type of bunker buster, or a daisy cutter type fuel-air explosive. That seems to be the standard line.

    The fallout below and around this size of neutron bomb explosion is severely intense for a short period, killing off everyone in that radius quickly. The radiation then dissipates rapidly, leaving little evidence of a nuclear strike except for its affect on organic material.  Keep your eyes open for some story about a massacre in Yemen, which would be the cover for the deaths.

  • They have done two in Syria and I am also waiting for the no nukes will be allowed , I guess depleted Uranium does not fall into the nuke category either.

This reply was deleted.