Replies

  • I am pasting some comments that were made to the article (from other readers):

    "Gay" used to be a perfectly good word connoting being 'care-free' or 'light-hearted.' I can't understand how Gay activity today would bring a care-free attitude to someone who is infecting another human being with a life-threatening disease. And communicable, too. Do what you will in private, but when this activity leads to communicable diseases which risks the public at large, something must be done. Simply to keep negative studies about this otherwise disgusting activity from being public, is not just wrong, but irresponsible.

    Besides, who left these cretins in charge of what I can read and what I can't? Hooray for Mike Adams and all his websites!"

    "Hardly a surprising situation. More sick people means more money for pharmaceutical corporations. It means less people challenging 'the elites' (difficult to do when you're sick), and it means more dead people i.e. population control. Sounds like a triple win situation for certain sectors of the global economy."

This reply was deleted.