Replies

  • Well, here's another reason (child porn).  (Does this also cover the other observatory closings?)

    "Child pornography reason behind Sunspot Observatory closure, according to court documents"

    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=107763

    Of course, this contradicts the man-hunt excuse.  Looks like like the liars need to get their act together.  Why wouldn't the county sheriff be involved in a child porn case?  Why would the entire place be shut down?  Why?  Why?  Why?

  • Yes, that right there blows that lie to pieces.  Bet they classified it as Top Secret so they didn't have to allow any scrutiny.  When the FBI is secretly closing down observatories, what don't they want us to know. 

    Walk&Reflect said:

    You know who else doesn't buy into door #3? The sheriff whose district they invaded. He says if it were a dangerous person he should have been notified, and given info on how to protect the people under his charge, not shut out completely with no info offered in any way.

    Remember who is doing this, the FBI, not exactly a trustworthy organization.

    https://www.kvia.com/news/new-mexico/sheriff-upset-by-fbi-s-handlin...

  • Another good article with more details.

    https://www.earthfiles.com/2018/09/19/why-did-fbi-close-down-natl-s...

  • You know who else doesn't buy into door #3? The sheriff whose district they invaded. He says if it were a dangerous person he should have been notified, and given info on how to protect the people under his charge, not shut out completely with no info offered in any way.

    Remember who is doing this, the FBI, not exactly a trustworthy organization.

    https://www.kvia.com/news/new-mexico/sheriff-upset-by-fbi-s-handlin...

  • The speculations I've read so far for the solar observatory shutdowns was (1) to hide PX-complex passer-bys (ZT), (2) to shut down deepstate sky operations (Operation Disclosure), and (3) this latest man-hunt excuse.  Well, they can't be all right, now can they?  I don't believe #3.  The other two have possibilities, but are mutually exclusive.  So, is the answer behind Door #1 or Door #2?

  • I don't believe that.

This reply was deleted.