Replies

  • You were there and saw them?  Did you hear the sound of jet engines?  If so, then we have two theories going... the jets were holograms, OR the article debunking the jets were erroneous.  I wonder which? 

  • I would need to interject but jets did hit the Twin Towers. I bare witness.  

  • That or photoshopped in.  But if the people who saw them were legit (i.e., not on the payroll), then a hologram theory makes more since.  Did you see the article where the video was deconstructed?  (Unless the deconstruction video was itself a photochop.)

    Keith H said:

    My theory is that the jets were holograms.

  • It was pointed out in that past article I referred to that it was also plausible people were planted around that were told to say that they saw jets.

    Kim B said:

    There is the theory that there was something more than the jets.  Too many witnesses saw the jets from the ground, and on live TV.

  • There is the theory that there was something more than the jets.  Too many witnesses saw the jets from the ground, and on live TV.

  • Yep I do not think it has anything to do with jets at all.

  • Think back to something posted here about 911, not too long ago, where pictures were deconstructed and showed a spherical shaped object impacting the towers, and suggesting the image of a jet was overlayed to cover it up.

    Byron wilkins said:

    That sounds pretty realistic to me.

  • That sounds pretty realistic to me.

This reply was deleted.