now, the universe can only be explained by reference to plasmas and electric fields. now, the sun is an electric dynamo and all the nuclear reactions occur not in the center but in the atmosphere and the surface. next comets are electrically charged bodes and not this silly idea NASA and others put forth they being dirty snowballs.
so, based on the above, I pose a few questions about planet X.
if it is 2.3 jupiter masses according to some and has a large magnetic field, based upon the typical reactions comets have of discharging the solar capacitor, as evidenced by the last comet to enter the sun, is it not reasonable to assume planet X will have no so much a large or even a very large effect upon Sol, but indeed a catastrophic effect.
also assuming the solar system is normally in some kind of electrostatic balance, that is electric forces are balanced between the sun and the various bodies in orbit, then on the assumption planet X enters the solar system, this balance
will be affected, in fact massive coronal ejections will be released also there will be huge electrical discharges between planet X and the other planets.
now, these discharges are such that planets such as Mars I believe --and velikovsky bears this out, are gouged by the effects of these electric forces as earth now doubt was. Such as during the last major cataclysm eleven thousand years ago.
now my question, if planet x is anywhere near the inner planets why are we not seeing not only massive perturbations in thie orbits, which the astronomical community will observe and also amateurs, but there are no seriously large CME's vis. the film' knowing'.
the above to my mind weakens the planet x hypothesis and saying it approaches the plane of the ecliptic is not enough. at some stage the sun will react with horrific force and we will get a bit hot under the collar shall we say !!
so, far all is quite. any comments please?
I am not a complete skeptic I simply have insufficient data to know for certain.
Comments
this is presupposing they are right. how many are giving disinformation including Nancy Lieder? we all want an expert to believe in a 'college profesor ' to look up to.
my own stance is to have a perpetual open mind about all things to believe in nothing and accept everything I here as a hypothesis at best . some things I do accept as factual, or probably factual, but again accept that my own paradigms must be subject to change of the facts change and my perspective changes.
thus I believe nothing unless it is obvious to me it is real. religion is a prime example here, and much of so called science.
in the end i treat all this planet X a good story at best yet allow there may be something out there, as there are many anomalous data points that can't be ignored!!!!
Although I do not understand every thing, you both makes good points for discussion. I am just wondering why so many conflicting information about the actual location of Planet X. If some people here are reporting having it on picture, can we actually calculate its location base on its size in relation with the sun?
Good thoughts Nicholas,
I am sorry but I do not believe that space is a sea of plasma, simply because of what I know plasma to be, a state of matter similar to gas in which particles are ionized... mind you enfused with more energy and a magnetic field, it takes on a liquid quality. Plasma is hot, very very hot, our shuttle would never survive flying through plasma because it isn't a neutral medium. I do realize that what we know of space is flawed and I do accept that there is much more out there than we can even fathom but going by what I feel I do know, plasma is what we witness on the face of the sun.
If planet x were out there and if it were 2-3 times the size of Jupiter, it would still be tiny in comparison to our sun, it would not have an electrical field that could fall into a magnetic balance with the sun's, image supplied for comparison.....
so even if it were 4 times the size of jupiter it would be tiny. :) Your turn.
when the comet flew into the sun was it a week ago, there was a massive eruption , now, I follow Jim Maccaney and he is probably the main proponent of the electric model of the universe and of the solar capacitor. it does explain a lot, an awful lot. most of the so called science put out by NASA, is rubbish science, apart from what Maccaney says, and a comet cannot be an icy snowball it is a lump of rock and hydrocarbons are created in its electric field which is the real nature of a cemetery tail-- it is trail of interstellar charged particles. and the universe is electric, intuitively it has to be. It is a sea of plasma and is not electrically neutral.
anyhow, there is no evidence to my mind as toi why the sun is more active now than anytime the last twenty years. it has been quieter true. now if a large body entered the solar syen, and I am no scientest, it is bound to upset the solar capacitor. where is the evidence for this? there a theory of baryon centers, what i understand is two charged or magnetic bodies can have balancing effect on each other such that they cause balancing of charges between them. my understanding. it is possible this is happening with planet X. its charge may be balancing that of the sun, canceling it out,and may be the reason the sun has been so quite.
so, a few more thoughts, over to you, Alex!!!!