Is Comet Elenin a Brown Dwarf Star? – An Exclusive Interview with Dr. Mensur OmerbashichYowusa.com, 01-June-2011
Marshall Masters
Contributors: Ed Douglas, Richard Goodwin and Terral Croft of the Planet X Town Hall, Comet Elenin Research Team  A vocal minority view holds that Comet C/2010 X1 (Elenin), is a brown dwarf star in a long elliptical orbit around our Sun.
Whatever this object may be, it is now inbound from beyond the orbit of Mars. Astronomers are following its course into the core of our system. They maintain that it is a relatively young comet, which then begs the question ̶̶ when is a comet not a comet? In contrast to that question, Elenin brown dwarf proponents often cite a paper written by Dr. Mensur Omerbashich that is available through the Cornell University Library. What makes this paper so useful is that it connects seismic events like the recent earthquake in Japan, to celestial alignments involving Comet Ellen. Cornell University Library, 11-Apr-2011
arXiv:1104.2036v1 [physics.gen-ph]
Astronomical alignments as the cause of ~M6+ seismicity I here demonstrate empirically my georesonator concept in which tidally induced magnification of Earth masses' resonance causes seismicity. ...I used the comet C/2010 X1 (Elenin), as it has been adding to robustness in terms of very strong seismicity since 2007 (in terms of strongest seismicity: since 1965). The Elenin will continue intensifying the Earth's very strong seismicity until August-October, 2011. Approximate forecast of earthquakes based on my discoveries is feasible. Original PDF – Yowusa.com Subscriber Download Dr. Omerbashich's paper presents what he sees as a cause-and-effect relationship between recent seismicity on earth and the approach of Comet Elenin, that goes back decades. However, His paper does not suggest, nor present the possibility that it is a smaller, unborn binary twin to our own Sun, so we contacted him to request a written interview, and he accepted. All three members of the Goodwin of the Comet Elenin Research Team, Ed Douglas, Richard Goodwin and Terral Croft discussed Dr. Omerbashich's interview and the actual list of questions presented to him were penned by Marshall Masters and Richard Goodwin. The goal of the question set was threefold: - Clarify the cause-and-effect relationship between Comet Elenin and recent major earthquakes.
- Vet the author's background in response to issues raised by Ed Douglas of the team.
- Test for support of the Comet Elenin brown dwarf star theory advocated by Terral Croft.
As per our agreement with Dr. Omerbashich, our questions, along with his answers, are presented as-is and without editing or modification. Following this interview segment, Marshall will present his findings on the question: is Comet Elenin a brown dwarf star, and if not, then what is it? Yowusa.com Exclusive Interview
with Dr. Mensur OmerbashichQuestions submitted by Marshall Masters and Richard Goodwin on May 25, 2011, Answered by Dr. Omerbashich on May 28, 2011 1. In your paper, ASTRONOMICAL ALIGNMENTS AS THE CAUSE OF ~M6+ SEISMICITY, you present Comet C/2010 X1 (Elenin) as a georesonator causality for an increased pattern of major earthquakes, all across the planet. What is a georesonator and how does this apply to Elenin? A forced mechanical oscillator is akin to soldiers step-marching across a bridge. The bridge eventually collapses when the critical resonance magnification is reached matching the grave period of oscillation of the bridge. Georesonator is one such concept in which the whole Earth is thought of as a closed mechanical oscillator forced externally by celestial bodies. As I showed back in 2003, Earth gravity responds strongly to alignments with the Moon and the Sun. Such alignments disturb Earth masses systematically and measurably so much so that magnification of mechanical resonance gets set off. I now tested the concept empirically, by using all celestial bodies in our solar system’s "plane". I was thus able to demonstrate that most bodies (when aligned in a specific fashion; for longer than around three days; etc.) are also capable of setting off the resonance magnification, thus causing earthquakes. Basically, the impact of resonance magnification on the mantle, which makes most of the Earth’s mass, gives rise to tectonics and, separately, to strong (~M6+) earthquakes as well. The inclusion of the Elenin to improve the robustness of the empirical test was justified by the fact that geophysics community is still clueless as to the source of most of the energy supplied to the Earth and required for tectonogenesis i.e. moving of the mantle/plates, as well as for causing strong earthquakes. The georesonator and its generalization, called the hyperresonator, account for that universally, i.e., regardless of what heavenly object one is talking about. For example, if we know that volcanoes on Earth erupt with burning-hot lava, but on Titan they spew ice-cold ammonia, the cause of volcanic or, generally, mantle dynamics on Earth cannot lie in thermo-nuclear reactions and processes, but is essentially mechanical. An important facet of the georesonator is that it explains why the Pacific Rim and Mediterranean regions are such tremendous shakers: naturally on the georesonator, largest bodies of water (actually: the absences of land mass needed to conduct vibration) act as virtual attenuators of excess vibration. Thus the largest bodies of water on Earth, namely the Pacific-Indian Oceans system and the Atlantic Ocean-Mediterranean Sea system, are likeliest places for strongest seismicity to occur on the georesonator. This means that most of the mechanically induced seismicity gets shaken off the georesonator by exactly those regions, respectively, as the vibration basically arriving from all directions ends up locked up within the largest landless rims first. For very strong seismicity (M8+), which occurs during multiple very long alignments, this division gets blurred, so that even inland regions become prone too. 2. What was it that first drew your attention to Elenin and has incorporated this object into your research? Has it compelled you to revisit any of your previous theories? The Elenin was suitable for testing of my concept because its trajectory, with inclination of around 1º, is virtually coplanar to our solar system. It also approaches the Sun relatively slowly, traveling along the legs of a hyperbola. These characteristics are enabling long alignments amongst the Elenin, the Earth and a third body. The Elenin also drags gravitationally locked particles spanning 30k+ km, but neither its relatively small mass nor relatively low density constitute forbidding factors for causing strong earthquakes in the georesonator. No other object with similar properties has been noticed in our solar system in the past few decades, to the best of my knowledge. In fact, I estimate that objects with as coincidental such characteristics as the Elenin’s can appear at most twice per century. This made the passage of the Elenin a unique opportunity for testing my concepts empirically as robustly as possible, given that instrumental records of earthquakes span barely one century too. So there is no reason why the Elenin would make me revisit my concepts as its behavior has been in excellent agreement with them. 3. Your georesonator concept, as applied to the Elenin, is based on your hyperresonator equations. What inspired you to first conceive your hyperresonator equations? Clearly, the georesonator was just a special case, as it applied to a specific set of closed mechanical oscillators. I wanted to see if generalizing the concept to the absolute realm would have a physical meaning too. So I developed absolute generalization in 2006 and 2008, and called it the hyperresonator. In it, every object regardless of its location or time is perfectly tuned with every other object. Thus no time or location must have a role in the hyperresonator equations, especially if we know that space, time, and space-time are all just imaginary concepts without any physical meaning whatsoever, unless such meanings are declared by convention (postulated within theories). Indeed, as I have found, there exists an exact physical-mathematical relationship, thereby a unique physical meaning as well, linking object’s grave period and its orbiter’s orbital period, with c, G and e, at a given scale. This means that the grave period of oscillation (that each object naturally possesses) is not a random number, as previously believed. The hyperresonator equations are the first analytical expressions for actually computing the value of a physical constant, the values of which are normally determined experimentally. This also proves that G is not a constant but simply a coefficient, as others have long suspected. Finally, what the orbital-oscillatory equations of the hyperresonator are basically saying is that a gravity field is simply a state of aether’s vibration. 4. Your hyperresonator equations also challenge the validity of Einstein's General Relativity theory and Planck's Quantum Physics. As a former geologist for the Berkeley National Laboratory in California and the Geophysics Institute of Hungary in Budapest, how have your peers responded to your hyperresonator equations? Hyperresonator equations do not simply challenge, but immediately invalidate both Einstein's General Relativity and Planck's Quantum Physics theory as fundamentally flawed. Newton’s assumption on constancy of G, and the faked "physical units" he attached thereupon to G only in order to close his theory physically as well as mathematically, have made his theory obviously flawed to begin with. By accepting this fundamental flaw, Einstein made his own theory of general relativity a mere alternative (Riemannian-geometry) description of the Newton’s theory. Adding a new member into the Newton’s equation in order to account for higher order terms has not changed the elementary flaw, as Einstein never altered G. There are no physical units in the hyperresonator equations – just proportions and scales, that is, all quantities are either unitless, or they carry derived units only. And, as I already mentioned, there is no explicit dependency on time or space or time-space, meaning the equations describe a fundamental principle. As for quantum physics being disproved by the hyperresonator, take for example the entanglement, the non-locality, and other "strange phenomena". They now all turn out to be simply consequences of the fact that georesonator-determined rules for orbiting and oscillating of everything on Earth do naturally provide the settings for all quantum experiments to trivially "work" – even at a distance, but which still is only a terrestrial distance completely defined by the georesonator. Here a distance is a geodesic on the georesonator and not just on a "body of that-and-that mass and density" any more, which was a simplistic view. Thus quantum physics will most certainly exhibit same phenomena differently from a solar system to a solar system; or, from a celestial body to a celestial body. Worth noticing here is the failure of all experiments aimed at accurately determining the value of G, which continues to this day so that G is the most poorly resolved of all official constants. Upset by this, Einstein once remarked that, if any field of research had a potential to invalidate his theory, then it will surely be geophysics. Evidently now, such a low accuracy of G-experiments is due to previously uncounted-for georesonator, a circumstance which, while providing settings for fake "quantum physics" to apparently work, at the same time thwarts real mechanist physics from producing best possible results. Curiously, Einstein never believed quantum physics was real either, distrusting its immense reliance on something as vague as statistics. As for the second part of your question, I never discussed the hyperresonator as there is no point in discussing a theoretically demonstrated concept other than noting that the derived equations are correct. Besides notifying the NIST of my discovery, I also submitted it to Annalen der Physik journal, which published Einstein’s relativity papers, as it should be normal for a journal that published a theory to also publish that theory’s disproof. But after the initial review by Editor, Professor Hehl, who exclaimed "So it was that simple!", he came back saying he was facing opposition to publish it. Some years later, I found out that it was probably a Stanford physicist and an active Zionist who keenly objected my equations. Just how smart it is to object an equation (where two sides must be equal, hence the name), I leave it to your readers to judge for themselves. To illustrate the rigidity of the game they played though, his official reasoning was that a mechanist was not allowed to use a thought experiment (of marching soldiers) unlike relativists (Einstein’s elevator) or quantum physicists (Schrödinger’s cat). Reviewers need not be witty or honest these days; some are willing to go as far as ridiculing equations while hiding behind anonymity, meaning they will even resort to argumentum ad verecundiam just to achieve some behind-the-scenes agenda. I still consider that paper submitted and I am waiting for Annalen der Physik to publish it with due apology. I tried hard to understand the psyche of people in the particle physics community who want to explain one magical concept of gravity by looking for the "God’s particle". I can imagine how powerful it must feel when thousands of minds get high on trillions in taxpayers’ funds, and then all of the sudden a fellow comes in who instead finds a "God’s tune" – immediately linking the Kepler’s laws to all of gravity theories ever contemplated, while by the very nature of his discovery, making also all those trillions essentially misspent. 5. The Electric Universe theory is very popular on the Web and puts forward the concept that there is electricity throughout the Universe and that bodies in space have electrical interactions as well. How does your georesonator compare with the Electric Universe theory in terms of Comet Elenin and could there be any correlations? I am not familiar with the details of that theory. Bear in mind though, that electromagnetism can also be a byproduct and a feature of a closed mechanical oscillator. 6. Many are concerned with the ongoing changes in the Comet Elenin's orbit and some have speculated that it is "under intelligent control." Have you found any evidence whatsoever to corroborate this intelligent control theory and if not, what do you believe accounts for these orbital changes? I was not concerned with such changes, be them real or not. I used the Elenin’s latest trajectory solutions. All I can say is that the Elenin has been behaving as postulated by my concepts, just as all planets in our solar system do. There is one exception which confirms the rule, as they say. It is the Mars, which I showed is unable of causing strong seismicity. Its influence via alignments is in terms of weaker seismicity only. This can be seen from the latest long alignment Earth-Venus-Mars of 22-25 May, which resulted only in a significant increase of M5-M6 but not ~M6+ earthquakes. 7. You mention 'Gravitational Shadowing' throughout your research paper. Could you explain what is meant by that term and how it applies to the discussion of Comet Elenin? Gravitational shadowing is explained and illustrated in my 2008 paper titled ‘Scale Invariability’ (http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0876). Recall that Newton saw gravity as an unexplainable "attraction between mass objects acting upon each other at distance". Scientists nowadays would call it a paranormal phenomenon and most certainly would stay away from it. Somehow though, here we are centuries later, still stuck with it as the pillar of all science. Newton’s biographers have noted though that he has built such a view based on his obsession with the occult and the alchemy, pure and simple. Namely, in such a view, there is nothing in between the bodies, and the entire action of supposed attraction occurs supposedly through the void. So in the end, as math never lies, his attraction equation ended up having a minus sign he could not explain. No one else could either, and the sign is by now normally omitted from all uses. But what the minus sign really indicates is that gravity is not attractive, as Newton would surmise and Einstein subsequently adopted, but repulsive instead. So, I asked myself: what if gravity is actually a mechanical vibration along the masterfully tuned aether (also known as fabric of Space, vacuum energy, etc.), coming from all directions simultaneously to the observed body? Such a generalization turned out fruitful indeed, as I was able to derive my hyperresonator equations demonstrating that an oscillating-orbiting system is not structured in an arbitrary fashion but is instead tuned, from scale to scale. It’s like a God’s symphony if you like; heavenly waves enveloped in harmony, from octave to octave. The fabric of Space is thus tuned in a most masterful way of all: the coefficient of proportionality, G, is what we all remember from elementary school geometry and biology as the most essential base of all, e, at a prescribed scale. Recall also that there are many natural or mathematical relationships which line up with e. so G turns out to be no exception either. Thus the gravitational shadow can be viewed as that obstruction to gravity vibration, which is caused by one body to another, thus masking the aether’s forward-propagation of mechanical vibration from everywhere to the body of interest. In other words, I abandoned what was probably the last geocentric view in history of science, and took a more logical view – that of omnipresence rather than local appearance favored traditionally. Therefore the gravitational shadow is a new measure of gravity, which complements or replaces the concept of mass, depending how you look at it. Thus a gravitational shadow is the factor which is at least as relevant in the alignments-triggered resonance magnification as any of the Newtonian parameters: mass, density, or distance (the latter in so far as it concerns the object’s relative size i.e. its gravitational shadow only – without considering the object’s mass). 8. You are a direct descendant of Viceroy Boril Boric (1153-1165), a Black Knight Templar and Bosnia’s first ruler. Have your ancient family connections to secret societies been an influence in your work? Black Knight Templar Viceroy Boritch was the common direct ancestor to all Bosnian kings and bans, or the founding father if you like. His recently uncovered coat of arms along with other information indicate that he could be the deposed rightful King of Britain, Count Eustace IV, who went on missing in 1153. A year later, we have a founder of a new State at the Drina River (border between Roman Empires; today Bosnia-Serbia), surfacing out of the blue and bearing only a viceroyalty title yet wearing royal insignia… Interestingly, an eminent British archeologist has recently claimed that King Arthur was actually a Croatian Knight whom he somehow linked to our own lineage. To complete the story: the Omerbashichs are matrilineally-directly the lineage of former Nemanichs too, who come from Knight Templar (and Boric’s brother-in-arms, and son-in-law) Stefan Nemanja, the founder of Serbia. Note the etymology of our surname: Omer+Basha, which is Semitic for Firstborn King, in the meaning of dynasty founder. Namely, the Ottomans conquered Bosnia in early 16th century, while committing horrific crimes including regicides of kings and even child-heirs. My ancestor Duke Stjepan Berislavic, who was also a cousin of a Croatia’s ruler, after valiantly leading the resistance for decades in the north and to the west, got slaughtered for refusing to convert to Islam. His execution was ordered by the Sultan’s grandson Husref, who administered Bosnia. After it became obvious that the Ottoman power was overwhelming, Duke’s heirs converted in order to preserve the bloodline. Since military leadership was the tradition in our lineage, they were in return granted the highest military posts in the Ottoman army. (To this day, we have never occupied a civilian authority post though.) Instead, the Sultan’s grandson placed civilian government in the hands of Sephardic Jews who were brought in from Spain and Portugal thanks to Pope Borgia (a bloodline of Spanish Jews who posed as Catholics). The Sultan’s grandson then founded Sarajevo for his new Jewish elite that took Islam in return for their new status of usurping nobility, along with the usurped land of our most noble ancestors. The few thousand families of this elite rules Bosnia to this day, and are easily recognized by their surnames’ suffixes of “begovic” and similar. Their treacherous character is best seen in occasional service that they provide to the English geostrategic interests, while maintaining Bosnia a coo-coo place where "logic does not apply and justice does not rule". (As recently as last month, they committed a real silent putsch, by which they maintain the ludicrous state of affairs in Bosnia; perhaps making it again a catalyst of a World War, just like in 1914). Namely, being virtually in the Pope’s backyard, Bosnia is of London’s utmost interest but only in a state of permanent instability. England’s atrocities towards Catholics are horrendous and always sneaky, beginning with the Richard the Lion Heart’s sabotaging of the Crusades, then with the Order of the Dragon sponsoring the Ottomans’ conquest of Rome, and finally with Elisabeth I and her mental army of quislings a.k.a. the Freemasonry that continues fighting her unholy war to this day ever since she vowed the old continent would never again supply able men to the Papal armies (used normally to try civilizing the Anglo-Saxons)… Is Comet Elenin a Brown Dwarf Star? – An Exclusive Interview with Dr. Mensur OmerbashichYowusa.com, 01-June-2011
Marshall Masters
Contributors: Ed Douglas, Richard Goodwin and Terral Croft of the Planet X Town Hall, Comet Elenin Research Team Page 2 of 2Question 8 Continued: You are a direct descendant of Viceroy Boril Boric (1153-1165), a Black Knight Templar and Bosnia’s first ruler. Have your ancient family connections to secret societies been an influence in your work? ...As for the second part of your question, I am not aware of any connection of my family with secret societies, as we practice staying in open. Wasn’t it Freemasonry and Illuminati who stole the plot of them being the reincarnation of the ancient Knights Templar? The English do steel lots of things, as recent history shows, territory and natural resources being just a sample. So imagine what they do to something as unprotected as storylines! For instance, recall that Freemasons count all great minds into their former members, alas only after those fine people die – conveniently so that they cannot deny it… Indeed, we see Anglos and their little helpers (London bankers, Zionists, etc.) for what they truly are. We put stress on truth. 9. Many on the Web believe that Elenin is a brown dwarf star, an unborn sister sun to our own Sol and your paper is often cited to bolster their theories. Simply put, do your findings indicate that Elenin is or possibly could be a brown dwarf sun? I am not an expert on solar physics, so I cannot answer your question. 10. In the 1970's, astronomers such as Carl Sagan openly pondered the possibility that we live in a binary star system and that Nemesis the Sun's dark twin was to be found in the Oort Cloud. With this in mind, do your findings indicate the possibility that we actually are living in a binary star system and that Sun's smaller sister is a brown dwarf? Again, I cannot answer that question as I am not an expert on solar physics. But I always admired Sagan’s imagination, especially when I was a kid. 11. When compared with the Comet Halley, the coma of Elenin is half the size. Likewise, when compared with Comet Hale-Bopp, which was a bright magnitude 0 comet, Elenin will at best, be a magnitude 4 or 6 - just visible to the unaided eye. Lacking the size and brightness of any number of great comets and by a substantial factor, how is it that Elenin qualifies as georesonator causality. The trajectories of other significant (relatively sizable and relatively slow) celestial objects, including those you mention, all have forbidding inclinations. Obviously, not being coplanar to our solar system, it is thus impossible for such objects to ever align with any of the bodies that compose our solar system. And those that occasionally do align are mostly short-periodic, meaning they usually travel on an elliptic-parabolic trajectory, making their approach less relatively slow than that along the legs of a hyperbola (virtually straight lines for the most part of the Elenin’s travel through our solar system). Furthermore, most other objects make no significant gravitational shadow, i.e., they do not drag a sizeable amount of gravitationally locked particles, etc. 12. Given the present ephemeris for Comet Elenin, it will be 0.2 AU from Earth when the next planetary alignment happens on September 27, 2011. Assuming we fix September 27, 2011 as the peak of a bell curve, what do you see as seismic event possibilities, preceding and following this high point on the curve? As I already mentioned, mass plays no role in my concepts, so the same goes for distance as related to mass in the Newtonian-Einsteinian magical view. As mentioned in my alignments paper, the Elenin will speed up significantly from August-October on its sling-shot pass about the Sun. During that time, the Elenin will not have enough time to partake in long alignments, and all that it will be able to produce in terms of setting off the resonance magnification (earthquakes) is some mild seismicity as predicted by my concepts, mostly due to the size of the Sun when the Sun is involved in the alignment. Worth noting is that I do neither modeling nor prediction of specific earthquakes. Based on the pattern of resonance magnification for strong seismicity during long alignments, I provide only the status of our planet's overall oscillatory excitation from the mantle's magnified resonance as set off by celestial alignments. You can find this status at: http://sites.google.com/site/omerbashich/. (Note there will be no status updates when there are no significant alignments, as only the quiescent times in terms of strong seismicity are expected under my concept in the absence of significant alignments.) Without auxiliary information on precursors, locations of strong earthquakes can be approximated only once the planet goes well into an alignment. This practically means that most accurate prediction would require additional knowledge on atmospheric, solar-activity and other types of non-terrestrial precursors. Such precursors have been studied for decades. They do fit the georesonator concept, as a consequence of the proposed forcing from the Space towards the Earth, and not some magical "outgoing radiation" as proposed by some to be originating inside the Earth and propagating outwards.
HRH Mensur Omerbashich PhD, The Sovereign Duke of Bosnia and Head of the Royal House of Bosnia, Croatia and Serbia, is a scientist who has made fundamental discoveries in theoretical geophysics and theory of spectral analysis. Over the course of his career he worked as lead geodesist at Berkeley National Laboratory in California, at Geophysics Institute of Hungary in Budapest, etc. He published dozens of research and technical papers, and served as reviewer for scientific journals. He was EC Marie Curie Fellow, invited speaker at scientific conferences in EU and US, and member of various scientific associations and bodies. Prior to obtaining PhD in theoretical geophysics from University of New Brunswick in Canada, he obtained Diploma in Advanced CADD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Under provisions of dynastic and other international laws, Dr. Omerbashich announced in 2010 the Act of Claim resuming right to sovereignty of Bosnia, which has been usurped since the Ottoman occupation of 1527. The usurpation continued under the Habsburgs and Karajorjevichs on to the non-lustrated communist cadre of today, as the de facto government in behalf of the joint self-declared usurpers – sovereigns of UK and other nations who appoint their colonial governors as rulers of Bosnia with viceroyalty powers. ### End of Omerbashich Interview ###
Is Comet Elenin a Brown Dwarf Star? — Commentary by Marshall MastersThe goal of this research is not to find who is right. It is to find the right thing to do. With this in mind, I will present feedback from Ed Douglas and Terral Croft of the PlanetxTownHall.com, Comet Elenin Research Team regarding Omerbashich and his theories. Findings of Ed Douglas In addition to being an Elenin team member, Ed Douglas is also a Planet X Town Hall Administrator and has always brought a critical eye to technical and scientific discussions. His findings are as follows: Sometimes, to research a person, you must look at their circumstances, and associates. Dr. Mensur Omerbashich has a web site, that is on the 'fringe'. Not what I'd expect from someone with a doctorate in a science field. The survival groups seem real enough, with realistic demands. The scientific theories are sound, but where is the smoking gun? Where are the pictures? When will infrared pics of Elenin be displayed by someone on this planet? This all gives me pause to totally jump on the bandwagon. I believe what Omerbashich and Terral say is scientifically possible, and even probable. But I don't have these theories in my cache, and must follow the science. The scientific paper does make sense, and I've researched many of the events noted, and in some cases, there are more alignments than mentioned. Using Elenin alignments as a seismic indicator speaks for Elenin having much more mass than a "comet". I believe this to be true, but still am holding out for the proof. While Ed's findings do not throw the baby out with the bath water as the old expression goes, he remains highly dubious, as do I. The Shockley DisconnectWhile Omerbashich's scientific arguments are difficult to follow, his persistent inclusion of unrelated and off-topic hate issues in his answers, certainly blurs the line between his professional objectivity and his issues. The result is a hate-tainted theory. Consequently, impartial thinkers attempting to follow the work, must first separate it from the man. A messy process. I call it the Shockley disconnect.  Dr. William Bradford Shockley Jr. He co-invented the transistor, and was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1956, along with fellow invertors, John Bardeen and Walter Houser Brattain.
A staunch advocate of eugenics (as was Nazi Germany), Shockley deemed blacks genetically inferior to whites and unable to achieve their intellectual level. The result was the Shockley became a pariah for his peers and the media. In the process, his views trashed the many accolades and honors that surely would have been his as well as that of co-inventors, Brattain and Bardeen. Instead of becoming heroic men of science, all three were consigned to the dust bin of history, as a direct consequence of Shockley's widely unpopular personal views on unrelated matters. Some believe his discovery and Nobel prize was actually a freebie thanks to the craft recovered at Roswell, and that he simply blew it, in a very stupid way. When you stop to think about it, it makes sense really. If you're really not the genius who invents something this significant, the honors and recognition mean less to you. Rather, a convenient opportunity to blow smoke at the public about something you do think you've got a genius bead on. Consequently, with Omerbashich, I cannot appreciate any aspect of his theories on Comet Elenin, without a Shockley disconnect – separating the man from his hateful stupidity. That being done, there is a correlation between certain celestial alignments and recent major earthquakes. However, with regards to any correlation between his theories and the possibility that Comet Elenin is a brown dwarf star, Omerbashich coyly evaded both questions. However, Omerbashich's frequent anti-Semitic quips bring a focus dichotomy into play. It is as though he wants us to focus on something else other than the existence of an unborn, binary twin to our Sun. Perhaps there is a hidden agenda here, so the question remains: is Comet Elenin a brown dwarf star? Findings of Terral CroftTerral Croft is a very strong advocate of the Comet Elenin brown dwarf theory, even though Omerbashich would not grant his independent request for an interview. Here are his findings: Hi Marshall:
I tried to correspond with Dr. Omerbashich about his paper and he did not have the time. The raw data supports my ELEnin/dwarf star thesis to a tee without asking any questions or gathering more input from Dr. Omerbashich. I rather like the fact that he was writing a georesonation/hyperresonator thesis paper and made our case without realizing we are tracking a dwarf star using the ELE orbit/flight path.
Terral Between Terral's optimism on one side and Ed Douglas's critical concerns on the other, the PlanetxTownHall.com, Comet Elenin Research Team has a good balance. This really helped Richard Goodwin and I, to formulate a list of interview questions for Omerbashich. Nonetheless, Omerbashich refuses to engage Terral's interest in the theory that Comet Elenin is a brown dwarf star. Bottom line. There is no clear cut answer or attempt to provide one. Then again, the dichotomy between gratuitous avoidance and rabid hate mongering does signal the possibility of an undisclosed agenda. This brings us to the question ̶ who is right? Marshall's Findings — Who Is Right?Here I can only speak on what I see as the real story. As such, my views on this topic have always been more aligned with Richard Goodwin who is a centrist in all this. For me, the truth in this business is like bread crumbs and you'll find them on the table and on the floor. However, no matter where you find them, you must fetch them up, dust them off, and savor every morsel, as thanks to a media controlled by a handful of elites, crumbs are pretty much all we've got. Therefore, based on the evidence available, who is right. Omerbashich for his proposition that Elenin is a georesonator; Terral for believing Omerbashich's paper supports his brown dwarf theory, or Ed Douglas and his contention that the flaws outweigh any basis for a credible prima facie case either way.  Marshall's vote is none of the above until Comet Elenin crosses the 7x35 threshold. 7x35 is the most popular size for binoculars. We use them for bird watching, sporting events, hunting and so forth. Many people have a pair around the house because they are very affordable and widely available.
Ergo, when Comet Elenin is visible with a 7x35 pair of binoculars, enough people will be seeing the same thing. More than enough people will be observing the same object at the same time, so as to settle any residual debates about this object. Short of the 7x35 threshold, the only right answer about Comet Elenin is offered by the Hopi Indians of the American Southwest. They got it right a long time ago and unlike other warnings. Dating back to 500 B.C., Hopi folklore remains a vibrant, living tradition to this day.  Their predictions for this time are known as the Hopi Blue Star or Blue Kachina Prophecy. Simply stated, the Blue Star Kachina (a.k.a. Nan ga sohu) will be harbinger sign and regional catastrophes on Earth. The appearance of the Blue Kachina signals our one remaining chance to change our ways. They believe their Blue Star prophecy, as strongly as Christians who believe in the Rapture.
What they envision is that after the Blue Star Kachina passes, the Purifier, The Red Kachina comes next. Those who who have return to the old ways will not be harmed. Those who do not, will face death in an unimaginable tribulation. In fighting terms, you could say it is a lethal one-two punch. Elenin is the Blue Star left jab that rattles our focus. After that, the Planet X Red Star comes at us like a bone-crushing, right uppercut. Despite Omerbashich grandstanding of hate, his georesonator theory does presents a prima facie case for Elenin's role in recent seismicity, vis-a-vis simple statistics. However, while this is a statistical cause-and-effect relationship with regards to alignments, is Omerbashich with Elenin as the sole cause? A tough question since Elenin is by no means as big or as bright as a great comet (such as Halley or Hale Bopp), so how does this relatively young comet generate this seismic perturbation power he suggests? Here is where Omerbashich's cagey but polite, avoidance of a brown dwarf sister star to our own Sun gives me pause. Either he wants to keep things simple so that his theory works as-is, without having to revisit his data or there is an hidden agenda. If so, what could be the aim of this agenda? The Hidden AgendaOne thing is for sure, a significant amount of disinformation is being injected into this topic. Since the days when I began writing articles for The Millennium Group back in 1999, I've been following the rise and fall of various topics of interest in this genre What I'm seeing here is strange chatter so to speak. Think of it this way. The government raises security levels after it detects a substantial change in the frequency and character of terrorist chatter. While they cannot decipher it, they can find pattern norms and thereby detect deviations. Consequently, when the chatter ratchets up, something bad is afoot. This is what is at play here, with Comet Elenin. I've followed the public discourse on Comet Elenin since its discovery in December 2010 and what I found was what you could call an unusual chatter pattern. There are two types of public discussions in this genre: Organic and synthetic. Organic discussions follow a stair-step pattern to a point of critical mass, then peak and fall off with occasional rises. An organic public discussion, is not the case here.  With Comet Elenin, I'm seeing a synthetic pattern where fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) are being injected into the public discussion on Elenin.
Here there is an unnatural growth pattern in the topic. Instead of a gentle stair-step, the dialog almost immediately rises to a peak level and then struggles there, before it collapses upon itself, in a useless heap. Furthermore, unlike previous synthetic manipulations, this new approach is more artful, in comparison to previously used disinformation ploys. Assuming this is so, what is they do not want us to see - or do? Again back to the Hopi prophecy where the Blue Star Kachina precedes the Red Star Kachina, The Purifier as they call it. If we remove the folklore story and focus on the celestial events, we see a strong connection between Comet Elenin, Planet X (as a brown dwarf) and coming tribulations. What we then see is Comet Elenin as the Blue Star Kachina. Currently, beyond the orbit of Mars, it approaches the core of our system from the Northern skies, and it will cause grief for our planet.  The Red Star Kachina is the brown dwarf Terrals advocates, but it is approaching from the Southern skies and is likely still beyond the orbit of Pluto as of this publication date, as described by the Avebury 2008 formation I document in my book Crossing the Cusp: Surviving the Edgar Cayce Pole Shift.
Assuming that the Avebury 2008 formation is accurate, how does the Omerbashich georesonation/hyperresonator thesis apply here? It could point to the possibility that both objects are perhaps approaching from the same general area of space. Ergo, Planet X or the brown dwarf star in loose alignment with Elenin is the missing link in Omerbashich's, Elenin/seismicity statistics, as suggested by Ed Douglas. Perhaps yes. Perhaps no. Nonetheless, the hidden agenda suggested by Omerbashich's behavior, plus the unusual disinformation chatter propelling this discussion clearly points to one conclusion. While Comet Elenin may be a partial causality of recent seismicity on our planet, it simply does not tell the whole story. This is the transcendent point, in all of this. If people are stampeded by disinformationalists into believing that Elenin is a brown dwarf, all the natural disasters that occur before and after it comes to its closest point to Earth, will be solely attributed to Comet Elenin. As a decoy, Elenin is useful to this purpose as its largely uneventful passage will disarm people and dissuade them from looking for the influences of an approaching brown dwarf star. What is arguably a factor in the recent rise in major earthquakes, given the massive amount of reporting on surface perturbations of every body in our solar system with an atmosphere — of any kind. The resulting paralysis of an Elenin non-event with regards to the public discourse, will generate reticence within the mainstream towards any kind of constructive and active preparation. In other words, all the disinformationalists need do, is to create a smoke and mirrors public dialog about Comet Elenin. The result is that more people will die, when the Hopi Red Kachina (Purifier) finally does appear. In a world governed by elites who believe that survival belongs to the fittest (namely themselves), perhaps the hidden agenda Omerbashich is so keen to sidestep, is deeply rooted in eugenics. In other words, if you're a stupid eater, you deserve to die. The bottom line is this. If you're easy to spook into reticence, you'll waste whatever remains of this ever-shrinking window for preparation, on a pointless fool's search for a smoking gun.  Then when the Red Kachina does arrive, you finally cross that bridge to an early grave.
As you do, elites will hunker in their bunkers and give thanks that to their disinformation operatives for what they've done for them. That they'll have fewer stupid eaters to contend with, when the dust finally settles. That's the real Elenin agenda folks. You're with it, or you're not. You choose. | 
Comments
Sorry for the very long post, but I wanted to keep it all together