http://starviewer.wordpress.com/2012/06/24/la-relacion-entre-magnetosferaionosfera-secuenciada-en-series-historicas-desde-el-ano-2000-al-2012-muestra-una-clara-relacion-con-la-actividad-sismica/

The relationship between the magnetosphere, ionosphere sequenced in historical series from 2000 to 2012, shows a clear relation with seismic activity.

i
1 Votes

Quantcast

A detailed analysis of sequencing between the relationship of the electromagnetic charges between Earth and the Sun, highlights the overlap in 90% of the events related to seismic activity.

Historical data from 2000 to 2012, show undoubtedly a cyclical process linking solar activity with geomagnetic activity on Earth. Additionally, this geomagnetic activity, shows a pattern consistent with seismic activity.

This theory is known as TGTRPT (General Theory of Tic Tac Toe Plate Tectonics), because it relates to a cause and effect, Solar activity, geomagnetic activity and seismic activity.

For the measurement of dipole charges of the Earth, using the TEC diagram that clearly shows the status of electrostatic charges between the Sun and Earth.

As we have detailed in previous articles over 1000, a clear relationship between the areas of greatest burden and the sequence of seismic events. The sequences of the diagram TEC (2000-2012), clearly show a logical seismic reports by date. Look, the clear relationship in major seismic events in Chile, Haiti, Indonesia, Japan and China.

The higher density of the TEC is represented by blue and gray spots in this sequence. Less charged areas are colored red, orange and yellow in this interface.

The daily collection of TEC from January 2000 through June 23, 2012:

I. Sequencing of areas of higher energy.

First sequencing reproduce more frequently every 2 hours, then filtered 12 frames per day.

II.-complete sequences from 00 UTC.

A sequence per day from 00 UTC.

III.-complete sequences from 18 UTC.

A sequence per day.

This is the first time you perform a complete sequencing of 12 years in TEC.

Check yourself stopping sequence diagrams historical seismic most relevant points in the last 12 years.

In blue, set the Sumatra Tsunami.

Let seismic positions of the day:

CCT diagram position of the day:

Chile: 27-02-2010. Seismic positions.

Diagram TEC

Japan: 11-03-2011. Positions seismic

TEC positions:

Guerrero seismic Mex.-positions.

TEC Diagram of the day:

And in all cases is verified: The increase in seismic activity zone is related to the intensity of the TEC.

Consider now the map of historical solar activity period.

If we consider the diagram of solar activity which corresponds to the diagram TEC:

We can observe the solar succession of cycles depending on the number of spots.

If we take the reference of the USGS, taking references weekly average earthquakes per year and the average intensity of earthquakes, we obtain quantitative data cualititativos and quite relevant.  (For example in the last week have been counted 225 of which 30 have an intensity greater than 5 orders of magnitude).

Consolidating data weekly average number of earthquakes and their intensity mean weekly movements each year, we have:

What gives us a qualitative and quantitative frame of reference that matches the sequence diagram of TEC.

1 º., Can be said that global seismic activity and the electromagnetic activity of the ionosphere are related, both quantitatively (number of earthquakes) and qualitative (intensity of) overall.

2 °.-The average intensity of earthquakes is not directly related to the number of earthquakes, but with differences in intensity of the zones TEC, which relates the seismic event, again with the Schumann Resonances, such as exposed Otha et all in 2008.

Bibliography of interest on the subject:

Hayakawa, M., K. Hattori, and K. Ohta (2007), Monitoring of ULF (ultra-low-frequency) geomagnetic Variations Associated with Earthquakes,  Sensors , 7, 1108-1122.

Hayakawa M., and K. Ohta (2006), The Importance of direction finding technique for the study of VLF / ELF Sferics and Whistlers,  IEEJ Trans. FM , 126, 2, 65-70.

M. Hayakawa, K. Ohta, AP Nickolaenko, and Y. Ando (2005), Anomalous effect in Schumann resonance phenomena Observed in Japan, Possibly Associated with the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan,  Ann. Geophysicae , 23, 1335-1446.

Hayakawa, M., and OA Molchanov (Editors) (2002), Seismo Electromagnetics: Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, TERRAPUB Tokyo, 477p.

Hayakawa, M. (Editor) (1999),  Atmospheric and Ionospheric Electromagnetic Phenomena Associated with Earthquakes , TERRAPUB Tokyo, 996p.

M. Hayakawa, OA Molchanov, T. Ondoh, and E. Kawai (1996), The precursory signature effect of the Kobe earthquake on VLF signals subionospheric, J.Comm.Res.Lab., 43, 413-418.

Maki K., and T. Ogawa (1983), ELF emission Associated with Earthquakes,  Res Lett. Atmos. Electr ., 3, p. 41-44.

Molchanov, O., A. Kulchisky, and M. Hayakawa (2001), Inductive earthquake-electromagnetic effect in relation to seismogenic ULF emission,  Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences , 1, 61-67.

Nickolaenko, AP, and M. Hayakawa (2002),  Resonances in the Earth-ionosphere Cavity , Kluwer Acad. Press, Dordrecht, 380.

K. Ohta, K. Makita, and M. Hayakawa (2000), On the association of anomalies in VLF propagation at Kasugai subionospheric with Earthquakes in the Tokai area, Japan, J. Atmos. Electr., 20, 85-90.

K. Ohta, K. Umeda, N. Watanabe, and M. Hayakawa (2001), ULF / ELF Emissions Observed in Japan, Possibly Associated with the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan,  Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences , 1, 37-42.

Ohta K., N.Watanabe, and M.Hayakawa (2006), Survey of anomalous Schumann resonance phenomena Observed in Japan, in Association with Earthquakes possible in Taiwan,  Physics and Chemistry of Earth , 31, 397-402.

WO Schumann (1952), On the free Oscillations of a Conducting sphere Which is Surrounded by an air layer and an ionosphere shell,  Z. Naturforschaftung , 7a, 149-154.

VM Sorokin, VM Chmyrev, and AK Yaschenko (2003), Ionospheric Generation Mechanism of geomagnetic pulsations on the Earth's Observed surface Before earthquake,  J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys ., 64, 21-29

Special thanks to the research group of ULF-ELF, A. Evans, D. Thomson & Team, without which there would have been possible to perform this analysis.

International StarViewerTeam 2012.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Earthchangers College to add comments!

Join Earthchangers College

Comments

  • Which one?

    Earthquake Precursors ... and extra.new particle from our Sun effects the Ionosphere, which in turn drains the Earth's Crust of another particle ... but not uniformly ... certain points/spots send out the precursors, and within 5 to 7 days an EQ hits.   The intencity of the precursors may or may not point to the EQ Magnitude

  • Yes very interesting.

  • This is very interesting!!  Thank you.  :)

  • The Youtube page is from Dr. Kent Johansen ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jq6anUO3u-4&feature=youtu.be   A good friend of mine on the ULF group :)

This reply was deleted.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives