Again, without a close and complete reading, I'm unable to say. It appears complicated.
Byron wilkins said:
Thanks that was close enough. Why is the date of 01/01/19 so important? is that the beginning of the military tribunals.
Cheryl Nelson said:
The EO itself is basically saying any crime committed prior to 01/01/19 is not going to have any severer penalty than what was on the books prior to 01/01/19, specifying certain applicable areas. The actual amendments are in the very large pdf, which will take someone with legal expertise in that area to explain adequately.
Not sure about that, Bill. It may relate to some things, but not others.
Jim Haas said:
It doesn't sound like we are going to be seeing very many prosecutions before 01-01-19, does it?
Byron wilkins said:
Thanks that was close enough. Why is the date of 01/01/19 so important? is that the beginning of the military tribunals.
Cheryl Nelson said:
The EO itself is basically saying any crime committed prior to 01/01/19 is not going to have any severer penalty than what was on the books prior to 01/01/19, specifying certain applicable areas. The actual amendments are in the very large pdf, which will take someone with legal expertise in that area to explain adequately.
It doesn't sound like we are going to be seeing very many prosecutions before 01-01-19, does it?
Byron wilkins said:
Thanks that was close enough. Why is the date of 01/01/19 so important? is that the beginning of the military tribunals.
Cheryl Nelson said:
The EO itself is basically saying any crime committed prior to 01/01/19 is not going to have any severer penalty than what was on the books prior to 01/01/19, specifying certain applicable areas. The actual amendments are in the very large pdf, which will take someone with legal expertise in that area to explain adequately.
Thanks that was close enough. Why is the date of 01/01/19 so important? is that the beginning of the military tribunals.
Cheryl Nelson said:
The EO itself is basically saying any crime committed prior to 01/01/19 is not going to have any severer penalty than what was on the books prior to 01/01/19, specifying certain applicable areas. The actual amendments are in the very large pdf, which will take someone with legal expertise in that area to explain adequately.
The EO itself is basically saying any crime committed prior to 01/01/19 is not going to have any severer penalty than what was on the books prior to 01/01/19, specifying certain applicable areas. The actual amendments are in the very large pdf, which will take someone with legal expertise in that area to explain adequately.
Replies
Again, without a close and complete reading, I'm unable to say. It appears complicated.
Byron wilkins said:
Not sure about that, Bill. It may relate to some things, but not others.
Jim Haas said:
AWESOME Bill
Bill said:
It doesn't sound like we are going to be seeing very many prosecutions before 01-01-19, does it?
Byron wilkins said:
Thanks that was close enough. Why is the date of 01/01/19 so important? is that the beginning of the military tribunals.
Cheryl Nelson said:
The EO itself is basically saying any crime committed prior to 01/01/19 is not going to have any severer penalty than what was on the books prior to 01/01/19, specifying certain applicable areas. The actual amendments are in the very large pdf, which will take someone with legal expertise in that area to explain adequately.
Byron wilkins said:
I love legal language, what did it really say?