I wonder if Sessions is invested in the private prison corporations. He really can't be that stupid to fill the prisons up.
Bill said:
While it may come as a shock to some, there is no conclusive evidence that smoking cannabis causes lung cancer. This is a bit counter-intuitive, as tobacco smoke is the culprit behind 80 to 90% of lung cancer cases. However, when it comes to those glistening, crystal-buds, the evidence is not there.
In a 2014 study published in the International Journal of Cancer, researchers in New Zealand crunched the data for 6 separate studies that included a grand total of 2,159 lung cancer patients and 2,985 healthy controls.
The surprising find? There was little correlation between the long-term use of cannabis and lung cancer.
Results from our pooled analyses provide little evidence for an increased risk of lung cancer among habitual or long-term cannabis smokers, although the possibility of potential adverse effect for heavy consumption cannot be excluded.
Dr. Tashkin’s work had similar findings. He hypothesizes that cannabis compounds may have a role to play in cancer prevention. He tells Time,
The THC in marijuana has well-defined anti-tumoral effects that have been shown to inhibit the growth of a variety of cancers in animal models and tissue culture systems, thus counteracting the potentially tumorigenic effects of the procarcinogens in marijuana smoke.
The results of these studies and the theories behind them are drastic departures from the “reefer madness” and “just say know” generations that have preceded the cannabis revolution.
While future research may clarify further risks of consuming cannabis, this data suggests that some of these long-rooted concerns lack sufficient evidence or support.
Regardless, all consumers, however, are highly encouraged to switch to vaporization or more lung-friendly smoking devices.
I wonder if Sessions is invested in the private prison corporations. He really can't be that stupid to fill the prisons up.
Bill said:
While it may come as a shock to some, there is no conclusive evidence that smoking cannabis causes lung cancer. This is a bit counter-intuitive, as tobacco smoke is the culprit behind 80 to 90% of lung cancer cases. However, when it comes to those glistening, crystal-buds, the evidence is not there.
In a 2014 study published in the International Journal of Cancer, researchers in New Zealand crunched the data for 6 separate studies that included a grand total of 2,159 lung cancer patients and 2,985 healthy controls.
The surprising find? There was little correlation between the long-term use of cannabis and lung cancer.
Results from our pooled analyses provide little evidence for an increased risk of lung cancer among habitual or long-term cannabis smokers, although the possibility of potential adverse effect for heavy consumption cannot be excluded.
Dr. Tashkin’s work had similar findings. He hypothesizes that cannabis compounds may have a role to play in cancer prevention. He tells Time,
The THC in marijuana has well-defined anti-tumoral effects that have been shown to inhibit the growth of a variety of cancers in animal models and tissue culture systems, thus counteracting the potentially tumorigenic effects of the procarcinogens in marijuana smoke.
The results of these studies and the theories behind them are drastic departures from the “reefer madness” and “just say know” generations that have preceded the cannabis revolution.
While future research may clarify further risks of consuming cannabis, this data suggests that some of these long-rooted concerns lack sufficient evidence or support.
Regardless, all consumers, however, are highly encouraged to switch to vaporization or more lung-friendly smoking devices.
While it may come as a shock to some, there is no conclusive evidence that smoking cannabis causes lung cancer. This is a bit counter-intuitive, as tobacco smoke is the culprit behind 80 to 90% of lung cancer cases. However, when it comes to those glistening, crystal-buds, the evidence is not there.
In a 2014 study published in the International Journal of Cancer, researchers in New Zealand crunched the data for 6 separate studies that included a grand total of 2,159 lung cancer patients and 2,985 healthy controls.
The surprising find? There was little correlation between the long-term use of cannabis and lung cancer.
Results from our pooled analyses provide little evidence for an increased risk of lung cancer among habitual or long-term cannabis smokers, although the possibility of potential adverse effect for heavy consumption cannot be excluded.
Dr. Tashkin’s work had similar findings. He hypothesizes that cannabis compounds may have a role to play in cancer prevention. He tells Time,
The THC in marijuana has well-defined anti-tumoral effects that have been shown to inhibit the growth of a variety of cancers in animal models and tissue culture systems, thus counteracting the potentially tumorigenic effects of the procarcinogens in marijuana smoke.
The results of these studies and the theories behind them are drastic departures from the “reefer madness” and “just say know” generations that have preceded the cannabis revolution.
While future research may clarify further risks of consuming cannabis, this data suggests that some of these long-rooted concerns lack sufficient evidence or support.
Regardless, all consumers, however, are highly encouraged to switch to vaporization or more lung-friendly smoking devices.
In fact, some research suggests that inhaling the herb may even have a positive effect. In 2012, a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that smoking cannabis does not cause significant damage to the lungs. Tobacco, however, can be extremely damaging.
Replies
Possible.
Byron wilkins said:
I wonder if Sessions is invested in the private prison corporations. He really can't be that stupid to fill the prisons up.
Bill said:
Just looking at Sessions eyes is creepy kinda looks like that guy that attacked the Ft. Hood. Some type of mind control IMHO!