I think a lot of it rests in "high hopes". we see what has been wrong and want to see action taken to make it right. From my POV if it looks too good to be true I expect its fake news until there is some kind of confirmation. I'm just not that trusting.
Cheryl Nelson said:
From my experience, it takes too much time. Most people don't bother. If it seems real enough it's taken and slung around the internet and that's how it becomes "common knowledge."
Keith H said:
I sometimes wonder how much time is spent on determining whether any story is legitimate or not.
From my experience, it takes too much time. Most people don't bother. If it seems real enough it's taken and slung around the internet and that's how it becomes "common knowledge."
Keith H said:
I sometimes wonder how much time is spent on determining whether any story is legitimate or not.
If you scroll down to the bottom of the About Us page you should see this. If you don't please let me know.. so much hacking going on I'm beginning to wonder if I'M not getting fake news, lol
Cheryl Nelson said:
Where did you find the disclaimer, Jen? I looked the link over http://usadailytime.com/vince-fosters-body-vanishes/ and didn't see it. On one hand, it says "may include information," on the other it says, "take it all as satire." It isn't written as satire and may have that disclaimer to leak real news without being sued. Hard to say. Let's see if any other more known sites are reporting it.
Sorry.. this is just more "twisted news" (their words) with this disclaimer:
DISCLAIMER: The Resistance may include information from sources that may or may not be reliable and facts that don’t necessarily exist. All articles should be considered satirical and any and all quotes attributed to actual people complete and total baloney. Pictures that represent actual people should be considered altered and not in any way real.
If you scroll down to the bottom of the About Us page you should see this. If you don't please let me know.. so much hacking going on I'm beginning to wonder if I'M not getting fake news, lol
Cheryl Nelson said:
Where did you find the disclaimer, Jen? I looked the link over http://usadailytime.com/vince-fosters-body-vanishes/ and didn't see it. On one hand, it says "may include information," on the other it says, "take it all as satire." It isn't written as satire and may have that disclaimer to leak real news without being sued. Hard to say. Let's see if any other more known sites are reporting it.
Sorry.. this is just more "twisted news" (their words) with this disclaimer:
DISCLAIMER: The Resistance may include information from sources that may or may not be reliable and facts that don’t necessarily exist. All articles should be considered satirical and any and all quotes attributed to actual people complete and total baloney. Pictures that represent actual people should be considered altered and not in any way real.
It's not USA Today Politics, it's USA Politics Today. It's a real fake news site. As Jen pointed out, the company name is fake. I tried the contact number, it's not a valid number. Mlordangod is just reading the fake news.
Glad to help Byron. There are so many lies and most going to try to discredit Trump and add virtue to the witch. Sorry I'm so disturbed by it all.
Byron wilkins said:
Jen thanks for helping us with this deception.
Jen said:
Sorry.. this is just more "twisted news" (their words) with this disclaimer:
DISCLAIMER: The Resistance may include information from sources that may or may not be reliable and facts that don’t necessarily exist. All articles should be considered satirical and any and all quotes attributed to actual people complete and total baloney. Pictures that represent actual people should be considered altered and not in any way real.
If you scroll down to the bottom of the About Us page you should see this. If you don't please let me know.. so much hacking going on I'm beginning to wonder if I'M not getting fake news, lol
Cheryl Nelson said:
Where did you find the disclaimer, Jen? I looked the link over http://usadailytime.com/vince-fosters-body-vanishes/ and didn't see it. On one hand, it says "may include information," on the other it says, "take it all as satire." It isn't written as satire and may have that disclaimer to leak real news without being sued. Hard to say. Let's see if any other more known sites are reporting it.
Sorry.. this is just more "twisted news" (their words) with this disclaimer:
DISCLAIMER: The Resistance may include information from sources that may or may not be reliable and facts that don’t necessarily exist. All articles should be considered satirical and any and all quotes attributed to actual people complete and total baloney. Pictures that represent actual people should be considered altered and not in any way real.
Sorry.. this is just more "twisted news" (their words) with this disclaimer:
DISCLAIMER: The Resistance may include information from sources that may or may not be reliable and facts that don’t necessarily exist. All articles should be considered satirical and any and all quotes attributed to actual people complete and total baloney. Pictures that represent actual people should be considered altered and not in any way real.
Now I have to wonder if Vince Fosters body was autopsied at this point.
Cheryl Nelson said:
Where did you find the disclaimer, Jen? I looked the link over http://usadailytime.com/vince-fosters-body-vanishes/ and didn't see it. On one hand, it says "may include information," on the other it says, "take it all as satire." It isn't written as satire and may have that disclaimer to leak real news without being sued. Hard to say. Let's see if any other more known sites are reporting it.
Sorry.. this is just more "twisted news" (their words) with this disclaimer:
DISCLAIMER: The Resistance may include information from sources that may or may not be reliable and facts that don’t necessarily exist. All articles should be considered satirical and any and all quotes attributed to actual people complete and total baloney. Pictures that represent actual people should be considered altered and not in any way real.
Replies
I think a lot of it rests in "high hopes". we see what has been wrong and want to see action taken to make it right. From my POV if it looks too good to be true I expect its fake news until there is some kind of confirmation. I'm just not that trusting.
Cheryl Nelson said:
From my experience, it takes too much time. Most people don't bother. If it seems real enough it's taken and slung around the internet and that's how it becomes "common knowledge."
Keith H said:
I agree Cheryl.. just more skullduggery to try to stop the progress being made.
Cheryl Nelson said:
Thanks. These sites truly are fake news and probably planted by the left to make their case against fake news.
Jen said:
It's not USA Today Politics, it's USA Politics Today. It's a real fake news site. As Jen pointed out, the company name is fake. I tried the contact number, it's not a valid number. Mlordangod is just reading the fake news.
Keith H said:
Glad to help Byron. There are so many lies and most going to try to discredit Trump and add virtue to the witch. Sorry I'm so disturbed by it all.
Byron wilkins said:
Cheryl I added this link below:
https://archive.is/kBTrn
If you scroll down to the bottom of the About Us page you should see this. If you don't please let me know.. so much hacking going on I'm beginning to wonder if I'M not getting fake news, lol
Cheryl Nelson said:
and on the same note... a week ago we had posts that he was refusing to charge hillary no matter what she did.
there's too much fake news... too much.
Also, that is USA Politics Today
© Copyright 2016 USA Politics Today. The USA Politics Today is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Contact info:
A Great Company Name
123 Main St,
Warwick, RI 02889
718.555.0062
http://www.usapoliticstoday.com/contact-us/
on a personal note.. I stopped listening to MLordandGod years ago and she's using the same info from the original post I linked above.
Jen thanks for helping us with this deception.
Jen said:
Now I have to wonder if Vince Fosters body was autopsied at this point.
Cheryl Nelson said:
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next