The tragedy of Malaysian MH17 continues
to elude any clear explanation a full 15 days
after this commercial airliner was shot down
in the middle of an Active War Zone.

The flight recorders have been evaluated in
England. The voice recorder evidence, in 
particular is of interest, when one also sees
the fragmentary remains of the cockpit, which
is riddled with hundreds of rounds of 30mm
gauge bullet holes. Dozens upon dozens of
entry and exit holes of those larger artillery
are easily seen.  

German pilot, Peter Haisenko says that, "In
sifting through the available images one
thing stands out: All wreckage of the sections
behind the cockpit are largely intact, except
for the fact that only fragments of the aircraft
remained. Only the cockpit part shows these
peculiar marks of destruction. This leaves the
examiner with an important clue.

"This aircraft was not hit by a missile in the
central portion. The destruction is limited to
the cockpit area.

"Now, you have to factor in that [the cockpit]
is constructed of specially-reinforced material.
This is on account of the nose of any aircraft
having to withstand the impact of a large bird
at high speeds...[one is reminded of] the crash
of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie...a large segment
of the cockpit, that due to this special
architecture survived the crash in one piece.

"In the case of flight MH17, it becomes
abundantly clear that an explosion also took
place inside the aircraft."

So what, exactly happened, here and how?
Russia recently published radar recordings,
that confirm at least one Ukrainian SU 25 in
close proximity to MH17. This corresponds
with the statement of the now missing Spanish
[air traffic] controller 'Carlos' that has seen two
Ukrainian fighter aircraft in the immediate vicinity
of MH17. If we now consider the armament of a
typical SU 25 we learn that it is equipped with:

- a double-barreled 30-mm gun, type GSh-302 /
AO-17A

- a 250 round magazine of anti-tank incendiary
shells 

- splinter-explosive shells (dum-dum), arranged in
alternating order.

The cockpit of the MH17 was evidently been fired at
from both sides. What would happen, when a series
of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive
shells, designed to destroy modern tanks, hit the
cockpit of a relatively commercial airliner from both
sides?

The anti-tank incendiary shells partially traversed
the cockpit and exited on the other side in a slightly
deformed shape. (NOTE FROM TRANSLATOR:
Aviation forensic experts could possibly find them
on the ground that is presumably controlled by the
Kiev Ukrainian military).

The artillery fired at the airliner was actually
designed to penetrate the solid armor of a tank.
Also, the splinter-explosive shells, due to their
numerous impacts, would also have caused
massive explosions inside the cockpit, since this
is what they're designed to do. Given the
rapid-firing sequence of the GSh-302 cannon, it
would have also caused a rapid succession of
explosions within the cockpit area, in a very
short time. Remember, each of these rounds
would have been sufficient to destroy a tank.

Commercial aircraft are essentially hermetically-
sealed, pressurized chambers. The explosions
would instantly increase the pressure inside the
cabin to extreme levels and cause the cabin to
explode. This is coherent with the wreckage found
at the scene in Donetsk Oblast.

The largely intact fragments of the rear sections
broke in mid air at the weaker points of construction
most likely under extreme internal air pressure. The
images of the widely scattered field of debris and
the brutally damaged segment of cockpit are the
slam-dunk basis for this assessment.

Interestingly, a photo with a wing segment, showing
traces of a grazing shot, aimed at the cockpit and the
high-resolution photo of the fragment of the bullet-
riddled cockpit have disappeared from Google Images.
One can find virtually no other pictures of the
wreckage, except those of the well-known smoking
ruins.

 

You need to be a member of Earthchangers College to add comments!

Join Earthchangers College

Email me when people reply –