There would be no other, but the military. And, hopefully, they aren't heavily infested with enemies. And, good point, if they are even able to... it would be a massive undertaking that might be too much, especially if there is intense resistance internally and foreign enemies decide to take advantage of the moment of weakness. However, there are others who consider America their friend and would hopefully assist. It has happened in the past. Some do see that if America falls, the light of freedom will go out.
Walk&Reflect said:
Yep I agree with your statement, and that last question almost answers itself, who else can hold the reigns? But while they do, banks, corporations, governments on all levels, will all have to be dismantled, and relaunched. No one but the military can do that (if even they are up to it), because of external threats that will take advantage of our chaos, as many are already trying to do.
Yep I agree with your statement, and that last question almost answers itself, who else can hold the reigns? But while they do, banks, corporations, governments on all levels, will all have to be dismantled, and relaunched. No one but the military can do that (if even they are up to it), because of external threats that will take advantage of our chaos, as many are already trying to do.
Cheryl Nelson said:
Not stupid, necessary. For the survival of the organism.
Agree on starting over. Our forefathers foresaw the possibility and provided for it. However, how do you remove those in power when they hold the power, other than by way of violence? It is said the military was going to pull a coup, but asked Trump to run, to do it legally, if possible. I would say that if Trump fails, the military will then pull a coup. They are, after all, sworn to protect this country from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Then, how do you vet their replacements? Who holds the reigns of government while the transition happens?
Walk&Reflect said:
well that was just me venting and talking stupid, not that they don't deserve it. The guillotines are an idea that smacks of corruption too. Unfortunately, removing almost everyone in authority from position, and basically starting over may be the only way to restart the system of governance, and commerce too. It's all broken. It all needs to be broken up.
Not stupid, necessary. For the survival of the organism.
Agree on starting over. Our forefathers foresaw the possibility and provided for it. However, how do you remove those in power when they hold the power, other than by way of violence? It is said the military was going to pull a coup, but asked Trump to run, to do it legally, if possible. I would say that if Trump fails, the military will then pull a coup. They are, after all, sworn to protect this country from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Then, how do you vet their replacements? Who holds the reigns of government while the transition happens?
Walk&Reflect said:
well that was just me venting and talking stupid, not that they don't deserve it. The guillotines are an idea that smacks of corruption too. Unfortunately, removing almost everyone in authority from position, and basically starting over may be the only way to restart the system of governance, and commerce too. It's all broken. It all needs to be broken up.
well that was just me venting and talking stupid, not that they don't deserve it. The guillotines are an idea that smacks of corruption too. Unfortunately, removing almost everyone in authority from position, and basically starting over may be the only way to restart the system of governance, and commerce too. It's all broken. It all needs to be broken up.
For a purpose, yes, but back in the day I think they were intended for We the People.
Internet anything can be manipulated.
"Getting traitors out of circulation permanently is our best hope of keeping the system healthy," you could say the same thing about cancer (traitors) and its remedy (via surgery or holistic therapies). In biblical tribal days, those cancer cells that didn't toe the line (with sanitary laws, deviant beliefs) were stoned or cast out of the community, to protect the community from becoming infected. Our forefathers provided remedies if the government became infected. Throw them out and start a new one. Harsh, but necessary, if the community (or nation) is to survive.
"Live, real-time, Internet-based democracy would also be supported, the WDS proposed."
This, if true, would force a major rewriting of the constitution, and I just don't see the people going along with that. WDS seems to be proposing globalism, but not zionist globalism. Should we trust them? We may need to toss the constitution to prevent zionist coroporate interests from hijacking the US political system again, as they did under the current constitution. I think some folks simply don't sit right with that idea.
With regard to the guillotine comment. FEMA paid for them already, so we might as well start using them. Getting traitors out of circulation permanently is our best hope of keeping the system healthy, if we ever do regain control of it from cabal hands. They should not be allowed to live on, commenting from jail, spinning what little influence they still can from their cells, at tax payer expense. We bought those guillotines for a purpose.
Replies
There would be no other, but the military. And, hopefully, they aren't heavily infested with enemies. And, good point, if they are even able to... it would be a massive undertaking that might be too much, especially if there is intense resistance internally and foreign enemies decide to take advantage of the moment of weakness. However, there are others who consider America their friend and would hopefully assist. It has happened in the past. Some do see that if America falls, the light of freedom will go out.
Walk&Reflect said:
Yep I agree with your statement, and that last question almost answers itself, who else can hold the reigns? But while they do, banks, corporations, governments on all levels, will all have to be dismantled, and relaunched. No one but the military can do that (if even they are up to it), because of external threats that will take advantage of our chaos, as many are already trying to do.
Cheryl Nelson said:
Not stupid, necessary. For the survival of the organism.
Agree on starting over. Our forefathers foresaw the possibility and provided for it. However, how do you remove those in power when they hold the power, other than by way of violence? It is said the military was going to pull a coup, but asked Trump to run, to do it legally, if possible. I would say that if Trump fails, the military will then pull a coup. They are, after all, sworn to protect this country from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Then, how do you vet their replacements? Who holds the reigns of government while the transition happens?
Walk&Reflect said:
well that was just me venting and talking stupid, not that they don't deserve it. The guillotines are an idea that smacks of corruption too. Unfortunately, removing almost everyone in authority from position, and basically starting over may be the only way to restart the system of governance, and commerce too. It's all broken. It all needs to be broken up.
For a purpose, yes, but back in the day I think they were intended for We the People.
Internet anything can be manipulated.
"Getting traitors out of circulation permanently is our best hope of keeping the system healthy," you could say the same thing about cancer (traitors) and its remedy (via surgery or holistic therapies). In biblical tribal days, those cancer cells that didn't toe the line (with sanitary laws, deviant beliefs) were stoned or cast out of the community, to protect the community from becoming infected. Our forefathers provided remedies if the government became infected. Throw them out and start a new one. Harsh, but necessary, if the community (or nation) is to survive.
Ben Fulford asserted:
"Live, real-time, Internet-based democracy would also be supported, the WDS proposed."
This, if true, would force a major rewriting of the constitution, and I just don't see the people going along with that. WDS seems to be proposing globalism, but not zionist globalism. Should we trust them? We may need to toss the constitution to prevent zionist coroporate interests from hijacking the US political system again, as they did under the current constitution. I think some folks simply don't sit right with that idea.
With regard to the guillotine comment. FEMA paid for them already, so we might as well start using them. Getting traitors out of circulation permanently is our best hope of keeping the system healthy, if we ever do regain control of it from cabal hands. They should not be allowed to live on, commenting from jail, spinning what little influence they still can from their cells, at tax payer expense. We bought those guillotines for a purpose.