I have just listened tk Jim maccaney again and once again this has been a most fascinating shows to listen to, a classic of its kind. I would like to say first, I in no way make any criticism of Jim, and hold him in the highest esteem, so here is my understanding of what he has to say on thus whole business of planet x
He is very scathing first of certain people and maybe justifiably , especially NL who leads a faction based on ET channeling via telepathy. he is regularly scathing of NL of ZT also he is scathing of one other person who marshals his forces and studies purportedly planet X via a bootlegged copy of the Kolbrin.
I won't say names as this would be unfair, I merely wish to state the facts.
however as with last weeks show, Jim alludes to the activity at the South Pole, and states that if something is coming from the South, Antarctica is the only place on earth where the object can be seen.
I remain as ever open minded and agree with Jim, we have far too little information. he talked about Harrington who went to new Zealand with an eight inch telescope and took some photos of the sky, in order tk detect movement therein. He js scathing about the claim by some that planet x is first, a glowing red object second he js scathing about the claim it is single object at all and of the 3600 year so called cycle. he says repeatably there are many planet X out there, yet implicit in his talk is the idea something is out there and s being observed. also thee is much he implies but in reality stays silent about.
next, on this weeks show, he states what I and others have be saying that if a planet x object is detected and is on its way, the power elite will want to lockdown the planet, make it impossible for people, to do very much about it. certainly a war and societal collapse plus the declaration of martial law will be the way to keep society in check, and he seems to be implying according t my reading, that this may be what is taking place now. they re setting the scene before th cataclysm occurs. he does say, and I agree with him that catastrophes are the way of evolution, for us and other planets. I would say for planets at out state if development.
so, much is said, much is implied but far more s I believe held back. Like all real scientists and not those from Nasa and such, he is objective and faithful to the acts. I respect him for this.
in summary, I believe he is not the complete authority on thus subject but would trust him fr at lest ninety percent of what we know. others may have a few more snippets of information such as Boris Artemenko, and a few others.
Replies
he seems to say far far more by implication, and association, than by direct words. whilst he gives the appearance of attacking those others who study the subject and he is quite right about their lack of factual content in their words, he does seem to broadly back up what they are saying.there are far far too many hypothesis, assumptions, taken and given out as fact when they are simply assumptions and circumstantial data. here I would back up Jim Maccanet completely.
Jim knows a lot, and you are correct he's not saying it all. He's been pounded for years and he has to protect himself. But, with what he does say and what others can fill in, we can find out more.