The reason why the Sun has not been electrically and electromagnetically
excited to the point where its outblasts would decimate life on Earth is
because Planet X is much much farther from the Sun than 20 million miles.
We have information indicating that X penetrates the underside of the
Ecliptic plane somewhere between Jupiter and the Asteroid Belt. That
information comes from Zechariah Sitchin's THE TWELFTH PLANET,
wherein he quotes R. Campbell Thompson's book [paraphrasing]:the ancient Babylonian and Ninevite astronomers observed that Nibiru
entered the Solar System around the "station" [which I interpret to mean
the orbital path] of Jupiter. Another concept that suggests that this is
the particular point of Planet X's entry into the Ecliptic plane is the
popular and plausible theory that the Asteroid Belt formed as a result of
a collision between one of Nibiru's (Planet X's) surrounding gravitationallycaptured bodies and a theoretical ancient planet which they call "Tiamat".
This theory reckons that Tiamat once revolved around the Sun where the
Asteroid Belt of debris now revolves, thus explaining how a ring of
asteroidal debris would have (otherwise inexplicably) gotten itself in orbit
around the Sun. There are some recent astronomical sightings also
suggesting that Nibiru penetrates the underside of the Ecliptic between
Jupiter and the Asteroid Belt; namely, that amateur astronomer Anthony
Wesley has photographed at least two comet collisions into the southern
hemisphere of Jupiter over the last few years, whereas, prior to the
Comet Shoemaker-Levy collision, I believe that no other such collision
had ever been sighted. This suggests that X's surrounding bee swarm of
gravitationally captured celestial bodies may have penetrated the Ecliptic
near Jupiter's orbital ring. Finally, my eight years of observing the
jetstream patterns on The Weather Channel indicate that, since 2004,
a bizarre jetstream pattern had persisted until around 2009, and then it
drastically changed, such that its bizarre sinusoidal (wavy) excursions
increased in both amplitude and in wavelength. Currently, those
north-south excursions have shifted northward into Canada, on the
America continent, while, oppositely, the jetstream swoops southward
over the European continent. This is why we have all-time record high
temperatures in North America, while oppositely, there are all-time
record cold temperatures in Europe. Moreover, since 2009, those
north-south excursions have lost some of their wavy symmetry, so
that currently, one deep U-shaped trough, plunging as far south as
Mexico, is followed by a smooth non-trough in the jetstream, horizontally
flowing well north of the Canadian border. Yet, prior to 2009, one deep
southward trough in the jetstream was consistently followed by another
identical trough. Another post-2009 aberration in the jetstream is that
what the Weather Channel calls "cut-off lows" and "cut-off highs" often
form, which take the shape of huge circlular high or low pressure zones,
enveloping several states. Prior to 2009, I never say cut-off pressure
zones on the Weather Channel's jetstream map.
Regarding the question about a distinct episode of extreme solar flaring
to result from Planet X's passage: just as your finger is
electrically stung when your hand nearly touches a large metal object (due to
the buildup of static electric charge on your body), there is a similar discharge
on a cosmically grand scale when this electrically positive charged dwarf star
comes close enough to the electrically negative charged Sun. Such devastating
electrical firefights between the Sun and the dwarf star will occur when the
dwarf star gets close enough to the Sun in its wide looping, umbrella shaped
U-turn over the top of the Sun. How close is close enough is a difficult question
to answer, because the deciding factors are quantitative: how strong will be
the plasmatic electric force field of X; how strong will be the electric force field
of the Sun (actually, these are also called energy fields, because an electric
field stores energy -- like a battery -- and it is only in the actual flow, or
discharge of electricity that that field's potential energy is converted to kinetic
energy, as force is applied to the electric charges to move those charges
through a particular distance). How strong will be the Sun's and X's electric
fields vis-a-vis how mutually close will the two bodies have to be in their
flirtation? Perhaps, when that dwarf star's umbrella shaped trajectory
crosses over Venus's orbital path, or over Mercury's orbital path, that will
be when all the Sun-to-X arcing and sparking will occur. This horrific electrical
firefight between the two electrified bodies bodies should occur when X passes
through the peak sector of that umbrella shaped trajectory, below which are the
orbital paths of the innermost planets and the Sun.
Replies
Looking at the repeated warnings, three major ones in the last ten years, two recently, from Ed Dames and based at least on his team of remote viewers, I would take this with absolute seriousness. but we must always look at the big picture, and I am on the side of John Dinardo here, though I keep an ever open mind.
It probably is. He was having trouble posting last night with a different discussion, though it was a comment. It kept saying it exceeded the character count (and wasn't). So, this sounds like a ning thing.
Cheryl, when this blog initializes you can see the post. Then it disappears. Could this be a ning problem?
John, nothing is showing here, but I see text in Recent Activity. Still having trouble posting?