After you view his diagrammatic analysis, involving a "heavy mass
object" (HMO), please view the actual New York Times report
and the Washington Post report, announcing the discovery of this
"heavy mass object" twenty-nine years ago.
Am I citing old stale news?
Well, for example, many months ago, the news announced that there
is a mass of debris making its way from Japan to the West Coast of
the Americas. Does that news grow stale as the debris gets closer
to California?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hgPaLfmC16o
The New York Times reports that a U.S. space telescope is being launched
to find an extremely massive body, possibly as large as Jupiter, and so
close that it would be a part of our Solar System. Their concern is that
this object is not safely revolving around the Sun, but is being drawn in
to our Sun, on a quasi-straightline trajectory, by the Sun's astoundingly
great gravitational pull.
http://yowusa.com/planetx/2009/planetx-2009-02a/nyt-30jan1983-planetx.gif
Exactly eleven months from the date of the New York Times report --
announcing the launch of the space telescope designed to sight this
massive intruding space body -- the front page of the Washington Post
announces that this massive object has indeed been discovered.
Notice (on page 2) the conspicuous attempt to cover up the fact that
this object is not safely revolving around the Sun, but is on an
incoming, and thus menacing, trajectory.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150332961547774&set=a.10150332959957774.389868.673732773&type=3&theater
You need to be a member of Earthchangers College to add comments!
Replies
Thanks for enlightening me, Keith. I'll consider this new information when studying
weather patterns for abnormalities.
Can you direct us to weather maps showing the average jetstream patterns that
existed over North America in the 1960s, 70s, or 80s?
That is interesting. I never notice these weather patterns before. We learn new thing every day.
Keith,
Having watched the Weather Channel daily since 2004, I never saw a cutoff high or
low pressure zone depicted on their weather map, nor did I ever hear them mention
these terms. Now, maybe other sources had always mentioned and depicted them.
But why would the Weather Channel suddenly start depicting them from 2009 and
later, but never before 2009. All I can say is that these cutoff pressure regions,
which are huge and circular in form, represent a major new development, at
least in the Weather Channel's reportage, as do the increase in size and shape of
these weird undulations in the jetstream.
Quite right, John. according to my reading, the ancients saw this happen, I believe the myths the thunderbolts of Zeus and Thor were precisely this. according to Alan and Delair, whose book cataclysm is for me the ultimate book on this subject describing the earthchanges of 11500 years ago, when the human race was down to about 10000 breeding pairs am I right, it is described how many of the trenches on Mars and indeed the earth may have been the result of these enormous bolts of plasma hitting and thus gouging out the land surface. They postulate the Carolina ponds, those round holes, -- minds fading here, need more cinnamon lol-- anyhow it is said these may have been the result of these lightening discharges.I am not quite convinced.
I still keep an open mind, again not skeptical. one question I have yet ti answer, is this. according to our model of this brown dwarf coming every 3600 years, and looking again at Velikovsky, he talks about the Planet Venus entering the solar system as a comet, and finally settling down in its present orbit, Jim maccaney even says it has a cometary tail even now. so, how does Venus and velikovsky fit in with the planet X hypothesis? can you answer this? Was Venus carried in by planet X, as a comet?
Nick, regarding your question about two distinct episodes of extreme solar flaring
to result from Planet X's passage: I agree with you, that, just as your finger is
electrically stung when your hand nearly touches a large metal object (due to
the buildup of static electric charge on your body), there is a similar discharge
on a cosmically grand scale when this electrically positive charged dwarf star
comes close enough to the electrically negative charged Sun. Such devastating
electrical firefights between the Sun and the dwarf star will occur when the
dwarf star gets close enough to the Sun in its wide looping, umbrella shaped
U-turn over the top of the Sun. How close is close enough is a difficult question
to answer, because the deciding factors are quantitative: how strong will be
the plasmatic electric force field of X; how strong will be the electric force field
of the Sun (actually, these are also called energy fields, because an electric
field stores energy -- like a battery -- and it is only in the actual flow, or
discharge of electricity that that field's potential energy is converted to kinetic
energy, as force is applied to the electric charges to move those charges
through a particular distance). How strong will be the Sun's and X's electric
fields vis-a-vis how mutually close will the two bodies have to be in their
flirtation? Perhaps, when that dwarf star's umbrella shaped trajectory
crosses over Venus's orbital path, or over Mercury's orbital path, that will
be when all the Sun-to-X arcing and sparking will occur. There should occur
only one of these horrific electrical firefights between the two electrified
bodies -- not two, and that will occur when X passes through the peak
sector of that umbrella shaped trajectory, below which are the orbital
paths of the innermost planets and the Sun.
Response to Nick's Questions, Part 1:
Yes, the reason why the Sun has not been electrically and electromagnetically
excited to the point where its outblasts would decimate life on Earth is
because Planet X is much much farther from the Sun than 20 million miles.
We have information indicating that X penetrates the underside of the
Ecliptic plane somewhere between Jupiter and the Asteroid Belt. That
information comes from Zechariah Sitchin's THE TWELFTH PLANET,
wherein he quotes R. Campbell Thompson's book [paraphrasing]:
the ancient Babylonian and Ninevite astronomers observed that Nibiru
entered the Solar System around the "station" [which I interpret to mean
the orbital path] of Jupiter. Another concept that suggests that this is
the particular point of Planet X's entry into the Ecliptic plane is the
popular and plausible theory that the Asteroid Belt formed as a result of
a collision between one of Nibiru's (Planet X's) surrounding gravitationally
captured bodies and a theoretical ancient planet which they call "Tiamat".
This theory reckons that Tiamat once revolved around the Sun where the
Asteroid Belt of debris now revolves, thus explaining how a ring of
asteroidal debris would have (otherwise inexplicably) gotten itself in orbit
around the Sun. There are some recent astronomical sightings also
suggesting that Nibiru penetrates the underside of the Ecliptic between
Jupiter and the Asteroid Belt; namely, that amateur astronomer Anthony
Wesley has photographed at least two comet collisions into the southern
hemisphere of Jupiter over the last few years, whereas, prior to the
Comet Shoemaker-Levy collision, I believe that no other such collision
had ever been sighted. This suggests that X's surrounding bee swarm of
gravitationally captured celestial bodies may have penetrated the Ecliptic
near Jupiter's orbital ring. Finally, my eight years of observing the
jetstream patterns on The Weather Channel indicate that, since 2004,
a bizarre jetstream pattern had persisted until around 2009, and then it
drastically changed, such that its bizarre sinusoidal (wavy) excursions
increased in both amplitude and in wavelength. Currently, those
north-south excursions have shifted northward into Canada, on the
America continent, while, oppositely, the jetstream swoops southward
over the European continent. This is why we have all-time record high
temperatures in North America, while oppositely, there are all-time
record cold temperatures in Europe. Moreover, since 2009, those
north-south excursions have lost some of their wavy symmetry, so
that currently, one deep U-shaped trough, plunging as far south as
Mexico, is followed by a smooth non-trough in the jetstream, horizontally
flowing well north of the Canadian border. Yet, prior to 2009, one deep
southward trough in the jetstream was consistently followed by another
identical trough. Another post-2009 aberration in the jetstream is that
what the Weather Channel calls "cut-off lows" and "cut-off highs" often
form, which take the shape of huge circlular high or low pressure zones,
enveloping several states. Prior to 2009, I never say cut-off pressure
zones on the Weather Channel's jetstream map.
I'm posting this for John DiNardo because it exceeds the 4,000 character limit for comments and it wouldn't post for him. His response is in the uploaded file.
Resp2NicholasQuestions.doc
I probably know as much as is publicly know about this mystery object, though have not the patience to do a thorough scientific study, maybe later. still, one question dogs me, where is planet x????, and why has it taken so long to arrive, since 1983, since Harrington spotted it, Lets look at it this way.
Lets assume it has made a pass within the inner solar system, let s also assume, it has gone behind the sun, and is slowing down and maybe about to speed up again on its outward journey again. First point, now answer this one, if it got to less than twenty million miles from the sun at any point, and assuming it has a mass three to four times that of Jupiter, I use the word mass, not size, which may be quite different, then on these assumptions why has the sun not been observed to go haywire, at any point on its surface? Now, let is look at Comet Lovejoy, this was, according to Maccaney, the size of Pluto, or Mercury and it did create a solar flare as it discharged the suns capacitor. Now, extrapolate upwards, many leagues upwards, if planet x got anywhere near twenty million miles of the sun, there would be humongous, enormous flaring that would be observed from earth wherever earth was on its orbit.
Now, to my knowledge this has not happened so, I assume planet X if it is real, is nowhere near the sun enough to create such a discharge. So, it must be at least as far out as Mars? Am I right here? Going back to 1983, and if this object was in the Kuiper belt, we should be able to calculate its mean velocity and its incremental increase over time. Am i right? so, where is it? I am not a skeptic, just asking questions, seeking answers.These points must be addressed.
Note; it would discharge the suns capacitor maybe on tow occasions, one, on its approach, as soon as an electromagnetic bridge I believe, is formed with the sun, and maybe as it reaches the far side and starts its journey outwards again. please correct my if I am wrong.
http://www.wsaw.com/blogs/jeremytabinblog/82007997.html
John, I don't know how to interpret them either. At this link, I've posted a few, plus a chart that showed what it looked like around the time of the Japan quake. It looks like a horizontal line around 2.5 is significant: https://earthchanges.ning.com/profiles/blogs/haarp-induction-magneto....
The real-time spectrogram is at: http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/scmag/disp-scmag.cgi.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next