Hello Gerard,
I just logged on to find this email in my inbox and am a little perplexed as to why itwas sent to me in the first place. I know of the drama that has transpiredbetween this ning and the other and I have friends on both which is pretty muchwhat I have expressed. I also stated that I have made it a point to staycompletely out of the politics that are occurring.
I come to these nings for information and possibly a community of like minded individualsnot to be placed into the middle of drama that I had no hand in causing. SorryGerard but I feel it is completely without merit that I received this emailbecause at no point in time have I gone out of my way to recruit anyone foreither ning. I have strived hard to focus simply on what matters which is survivaland if you take the time to read through the post I have put up you will noticethat it keeps to that trend aside from minor deviance when I first started onthis ning.
I respect you and everyone involved in this ning but I also respect some of those involvedon the other ning. What I am having trouble reconciling is why is there adivide if it all comes down to expressing ones opinions, shouldn't all of ouropinions carry merit?
I find myself having to choose between this site and that one which is a true travestyseeing as how we all have the same goals which is simply to survive the earthchanges. I know you have your own personal feelings for handling matters theway you have and I hope you have taken the time to acknowledge that mud hasbeen slung both ways. That at times you may be of a different opinion thansomeone else but that does that take away from the contributions that they havemade.
Going through some of the post on this site I do not fail to see the aggression insome of the post regarding those on the other ning which I guess includes mefor some unbeknown reason. Simply because I wanted to stay in touch withfriends. I ask you now Gerard are you my friend, are you here to help mesurvive or at least attempt to prepare?
Because I see the email you sent more as a threat than as a warning. I see it as if Idon't do what I am being told I will be suspended. Which to me is cut off fromfriends that I have made. I don't know about you Gerard but if I told you thatI would cut you off from the friends that you have made would you react calmlyand simply move on or would you be offended that I would do such a thing for sosimple a matter as posting my opinion.
We are all striving to be STO are we not? Then where does it state that being serviceto other includes banishing of those who do not follow our precepts to the tee.Sorry Gerard but this is not how I was raised nor how I live my life. Thank youfor this ning and with a heavy heart I say goodbye. May this ning inspiremillions and my the light shine on you all.
From Gerard Zwaan to Alex Cortes
Sent 18 hours ago
Alex,
I ask you not to recruit for cheryl's ning. Not on a comment and not by sending out messages.
If you decide to to it anyway, i will have to suspend you from this ning.
guess me posting it as a blog was a bit much :)
Comments
When people get stressed out, they fall in these patterns of behavior, these coping habits. It's good to be aware of this and to consider how this may affect us in the future.
I know the old Troubled Times group discussed these issues at length.
The sort of thing we're dealing with now focusses us to really think these human/social elements of our preparation through. Maybe I'm off on this, I'm just thinking out loud.
On the one hand I can understand the need to curtial freedom of speech as the main theme can become diluated and containated from unwanted sources and protecting the jewel in the crown becomes harder (keeping pure is an easier option), but on the other hand excercising a code of law by using a religious ferocity approach reveals fear of loss of control. Maybe, members and owners of sites such as these which contain information about the end of humanity as we know it very soon should be vetted better. Seeing a video of Gerrard talking might help as it is possible that he does not exist and its just a photo with another person acting a role. At least we all know who Nancy is to some degree. She is the only one. I can understand the fear that prevails by hosts as we are dealing with many nutters, anonomous people and agents of PTB. These people can easily dilute important points if given a chance and sway many people away from important points.
How rude!!!