SECRETUM OMEGA THE AUTHENTIC PHOTO SENT BY THE JESUIT
The scanning of photos taken from the Space Shuttle - and sent years ago
By Jesuit Cristoforo Barbato in SIV - is authentic.
But back to 1986: Mission STS-61C
By Luca Scantamburlo
I'll be back to talk about the case Secretum Omega because I have something significant to communicate and comment. I write my essay in The American Armageddon - among the material sent to Cristoforo Barbato by Jesuit SIV of the Holy See - there's also the image of a purported class spazioplano Aurora, a top secret U.S. Air Force hypersonic aircraft capable of out by the atmosphere. Thanks for such an aircraft - and the collaboration of Lockheed Martin aerospace industry - would be put in orbit in the early '90, the space probe named "Shiloh", intended to venture into deep space to monitor the approach of Nibiru the sun according to the testimony of this collection years ago by Jesuit Cristoforo Barbato, freelancers and independent researcher, active mainly in Naples ufology, and space exploration and military secret, but not only (his name certainly does not look out of place in one of Lists of the Register of Journalists, saw his previous work, but unfortunately not a journalist can be defined according to Italian law, as it is in writing and never has been, but in my opinion has always shown respect for his articles in ethics).
Referring to one of the legends of the long interview granted me more than three years ago by C. Barbato for the bi-monthly UFO News - learned that the photo was made in December 2002 through the porthole of a Space Shuttle mission in secret (see page 102, Chapter IV: "The Vatican investigates the mysteries of deep space?").
But together we read the caption that accompanied my writing at the time, published bimonthly on the Italian director Roberto Pinotti: “[...] photos of the supposed Aurora aircraft, according to what is learned from the source was made on 31/12/02 the porthole of a Shuttle mission. NASA archive is that the last official duty performed in 2002 was between 23/11 and 7/12 with the Shuttle Endeavor.”
In light of the revelations of McClelland might be reasonable to assume that it was taken during one of the secret NASA / NSA mission called "Classified".” taken from caption on page 27 of the service-interview entitled “Secretum Omega. The Sumerians, the Vatican and Siloam, an alleged secret space probe.” , L. Scantamburlo, UFO News , no. 62, April-May 2006. The caption is not signed. Since the text of it was not created by me, I recently asked about the Christopher Barbato, who informed me that if I took him at his time, by sending to the drafting of UFO News even used the photo for my service (which , the latter, I already knew). Barbato told me that was not attributed to the Jesuit image dates, but his was a deduction based on the written too laid hand on the picture. Unfortunately, since the picture came to him after the last face to face he had with the Vatican insider, he was unable to ask or clarify details about the exact origin. He knew only by his source that the photo was taken from a Space Shuttle in orbit.
Well, this has clarified one aspect that I had misunderstood, giving the date right to information obtained by the Jesuit. The writing misled us. I, then, did not delve into, but I realize only now that the clues to trace the truth have always been under our noses: the letters written by hand by someone on the picture ("61c - 31-02") - and wrongly interpreted as a date - was the key. The fact that I candidly admit my carelessness - and the oversight of others - should be a stimulus to all readers and researchers called: some, instead of getting lost in useless controversies, would do better to engage in disclosure and constructive criticism. I am sorry that no one has publicly taken before me.
Also, apparently nobody has talked about or discussed previously in magazines or in social networks, and this shows that there seems to be widespread serious desire to understand. Or perhaps this suggests that the case Secretum Omega - with all its shadows - is of such complexity and such a huge amount of detail that discourages even the most willing. But if the same aerospace journalist and sociologist Roberto Pinotti has devoted a voice in his latest book came out for the types of Mondadori ("Aliens. A meeting announced"), this should make us reflect for a long time even the most skeptical. Do not you think?
The photo taken FROM SHUTTLE COLUMBIA: January 1986
We now come to my baby - and eventful - discovery that puts in place another piece of the enigmatic and complex mosaic of case Secretum Omega. Browsing the net I came across some video montages of a YouTube user called "LunaCognita", written by May 9, 2008 ( https://www.youtube.com/user/LunaCognita ). Among them is the video titled “Aliens in the NASA Archives - More Stunning NASA UFO Anomalies Captured On Film”, about 10 minutes in length. Right there - the 2 minute and 52 seconds - I found that once I insert an image seemed familiar. I went to check the source directly. This is indeed an official photo taken from a NASA Space Shuttle in orbit, during January 1986. In the online archives of the NASA Kennedy Space Center, it is cataloged "STS61C-31-002", and the name of the file 10062623.jpg. It can be found at the following link: http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/mirrors/images/images/pao/STS61C/10062623.jpg was taken aboard the Space Shuttle Columbia - NASA tells us the text that illustrates another link. When? He says January 12, 1986. Surely between 12 and 23 January 1986 (day of return to earth). Comment about Nasa: "Title: Piece of thermal insulation tile floats near the Shuttle Columbia Description: A small piece of thermal insulation tile floats in space near the shuttle Columbia. The cloudy surface of the earth is used as a background. " Source: http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/mirrors/images/images/pao/STS61C/10062623.htm
TRIANGULAR OBJECT: THE fanciful explanation NASA
Engineers from NASA's explanation - that the black object portrait would be a piece of insulation that floats near the Shuttle Columbia - in my opinion a bit 'fancy. Just compare the object with the insulating tiles covering the shuttle. Where you would loose this insulating material? The Shuttle? And then you realize its size. Almost certainly the object that stands against the beautiful blue planet, is very different feet, not inches. And even if one of about 31 000 tiles of silica attached to the backbone - forming a protective insulating layer (the Thermal Protection System, in short TPS) - American and detached from the spacecraft, it would mean serious problems during re-entry of the medium. As it actually happened on 1 February 2003 and just the Shuttle Columbia (STS-107), which disintegrated over Texas and fell in a host of flaming pieces because of damage to the TPS, procured during the days before launch. Most of the protective tiles which are of the Shuttle American are termed "LI-900 silica tiles", and are constituted by a combination of materials: are composed mainly of very pure quartz sand, made rigid by other substances. The secondment of one of them involves serious risks Shuttle orbiter during re-entry. Instead the crew of STS-61C Columbia in January 1986, he returned to earth safely. Also there is another picture - cataloged STS-61C-31-003 and shown in the video LunaCognita - which depicts a similar black triangular object. So this is the same object or photographed at different times and from different perspectives, or the space is filled with insulating tiles that float. From the photo NASA is known throughout the symmetry of the object, rather than a tile that looks like a delta spazioplano.
Well, the picture taken on board the Columbia shows the same view of the subject and the image sent by the Jesuit, although it is public domain in digital format (converted to digital from the original print or slide), and of different quality. Considering the information index page, the image NASA's online since at least July 2, 1994. This derives from the fact that the image sent by the Jesuit to Barbato SIV, is a scan of a photo slightly damaged, with shades of different color, and has in my opinion light reflections typical of a photographic print. Obviously you should ask an expert, because I'm not, but there is no doubt - from the details - it is the same image. Also because this would explain the hand-written on the picture that begins with "61C", the final part of the code name for the Shuttle mission at the time: STS-61C, while 31-02 are almost all five numbers in the final part the name of the cataloged Photographic NASA: "STS61C-31-002". To have a similar picture (with a different quality from that of the public domain), the Jesuit SIV must have had close contacts, and this speaks well of his credibility ( assuming of course that you have not downloaded the image from the network, he has printed and then ruined). In any case, the Jesuit gave an authentic picture, consistent with its information. On the rest of the interesting material (especially the "Jesuit Footage", which is not public domain) and its history, still can not judge with certainty.
The NASA ADMINISTRATOR CHARLES F. Bolden KNOWS THE TRUTH ABOUT FLYING TRIANGLE?
Would be very interesting if one of the journalists who participate in the NASA press conference, there was one which he addressed to the American Space Agency's new Chief Executive and asked what he photographed the crew of Columbia in January 1986, pointing the photographic objective to the black triangle that seems to emerge by the atmosphere. Yes, because at the list of the astronauts of mission STS-61C, I found the name of Charles F. Bolden Jr. (born August 19, 1946). As it happens today, the first African American to lead NASA - since July 2009, with the appointment of President Obama and the Senate confirms - it is Charles F. Bolden Jr., a pilot of the Shuttle mission at the time. Among other things, Frank Charles Bolden Jr. is a highly decorated senior officer, former General of the Marine Corps, a veteran of the Vietnam War as a pilot in the skies of Laos, Cambodia and South Vietnam.
It has two degrees and before arriving at the top of NASA, he had already worked there in the past 14 years (since he was selected as an astronaut in 1980). One would wonder why the choice of NASA Administrator has fallen today on a former astronaut who is also a former fighter and a high-ranking military officer well qualified. This decision seems strangely on the same wavelength of months ago that taken by the Department of Defense (DoD) U.S., which imposed the secrecy classification on race cars (and "fireballs" - in English - in general). A former high-ranking military guide NASA, the Pentagon and the military are concerned about the fireballs. But, as we know, the hard questions no longer seem the norm in Italian journalism and international, or rather when they are directed mainly to the scandals in which is involved our Prime Minister. I think there are problems and issues far more important: protecting the environment, depletion of energy resources, the causes of climate change, the obsession with secrecy about extraterrestrial reality and the exploration Secret Space, conducted with no conventionally propelled orbiter and probe.
© Luke Scantamburlo August 14, 2009 Reproduction is allowed on the Web if Accompanied by the statement © L. Scantamburlo - www.angelismarriti.it
Comments