Not sure how this video got to me, by way of this site, email, another ning, picked up from YouTube while browsing, or if from FB... but it's bugging me. If someone posted it on this ning (or, even if they didn't) can someone decipher, please? I know the heading says there is no 10th planet, and I gather that (supposedly) it got invented by the ruling few, but what all is the text on the video saying (in detail)? For some reason, it's coming to me in a weird, mixed up message.
Help me out on this, and I'll never ask for help again ------ at least I'll think hard and long before asking again.
Comments
... lol, so MUCH info...!!!
http://youtu.be/pgvrF6gxgGs
(: chuckle :) Keith ...is there something that will translate the video you linked to: https://www.youtube.com/user/thisabre All I understood was "www" and "com."
Quote "...what matters is how we ... synthesis ... data ... by keeping a wide open mind and not having any hard and fast paradigms, a working hypothesis is vital but don't get attached to [it] as many scientists seem to do." Definitely, nicholas
LOL --don't trust NASA, USGA, NOAA etc -- that has certainly become a given - reference: http://youtu.be/_ecBbSIdBKI
Thanks for your help. I certainly have a whole lot more research to do.
Mother shipton said as much also the nun, Hildegard in the was it 14th century, have you links to your own research here? videos perhaps?
Several prophecies in the past 30+ years speak of a body in space passing by and causing devastation. Now, is this body these prophecies refer to PX? I don't know what it could be but something could happen involving a body in space.
Richard Sauder is a very interesting man to listen to has done extensive research on deep underground bases, surprised you are not familiar with him. renowned expert on this topic. If I can find some links I will post them for you. I am sympathetic as far as Von daniken goes and Sitchin though I have never read his books but am quite informed about his work his theories. I read Daniken many years ago in the stupidity of my youth, long past me now, but he was on Coast to Coast a few days ago, fascinating programme.
I think, in fact, am convinced there should be no order in what books or videos we read or watch. what matters is how we interpret them and how we synthesis the data . this made easier by keeping a wide open mind and not having any hard and fast paradigms , a working hypothesis is vital but don,t get attached to t as many scientists seem to do. I believe daniken is basically correct and Sitchin, maybe,
listen to the two podcast by sheldon Day I posted below, also very interesting.
all I can say is, much more research need be done before we/I understand this video completely. but I ask, why worry about it? we must presume there are scores of races out there, in our solar system. the best thing I think, unless you have a lot more data, simply leave it as it is, it can't be of any more importance than all the other stuff we hear about. just listened to Sheldon Day, very very interesting, the links are below. more down to earth and focusing on the geophysical data and such on planet x 's imminent passing
http://thelightofdayradioshow.com/archives/shows/LOD-PODCAST_11-12-...
http://thelightofdayradioshow.com/archives/shows/LOD-Update-Podcast...
I would b very interested in the points where you differ, Keith, we are all learning, mine was just a cursory analyses, and I do hope msred asks for help if or whenever she wants to. we are all here to be of service. i will watch the videos very soon.
so, while the tea is brewing, lets analyses this carefully.
first have you or any of us heard of any of these races of beings that is mentioned? all high sounding words meant to impress. next, they refute what is patently true, that is, some anomaly has been detected beyond and within Pluto orbit, ask John Dinardo this.
next they make claims that Sitchin was wrong and is some agent, working for a party with some agenda it seems to say. can this be true? from my own limited knowledge this seems ludicrous.
next they point out the impossibility, so they say of an orbit vertical to the planar orbits if the solar system planets. now Stan Deyo has done some mathematics recently where he has prove there is an orbital shell in the solar system that is unfilled and to everyones surprise this orbital shell is at about 36 degrees to the orbits of the rest of the planets at an angle to the plane the planets are contained in. very very intriguing.
now, as I have said to John before, why are they building all the bunkers at a cost of trillions dollars.. just a minute get some tea..you can't believe the sheer utter pleasure in a pot of real Indian tea. i have a lactose intolerance and am trying carefully to use milk again semi skimed, so far so good..
anyhow, the whole thing seems to work on the level of confusion and disinformation. I would treat it with interest but like so much we get from NASA, USGA, NOAA etc treat it with suspicion and basically msred, I think it is put out to confuse those who watch it, place uncertainty and doubt in their minds thats all.
I would listen to the following John Dinardo. Richard Sauder, Marshal Masters, Bill deagle and there are others. I don't accept all they say but they are objective to the facts. listen to Ed dames about the killshot. I hope this planex x is a load of manure personally but keep a watchful eye for events ----and events in the sky.
that is my take on this so hope it helps. now for that cup of tea....
oh, and always ask for help, I do, still can't decide what that sound was the other morning over my house but still not been abducted yet....
I think I can decipher this a little at least give some pointers as what is being said here, I hope so. but first, must make another pot of tea, dying of thirst here...back in a few minutes......