FURTHER INFORMATION ON JESUIT FOOTAGE CLASSIFIED
SECRETUM OMEGA
http://www.angelismarriti.it/presenzealiene/SecretumOmega-approfondimenti.htm
THE JOURNAL OF A SERVICE AREA 51 Deduct THE CASE STUDIES "SECRETUM OMEGA"
By Luca Scantamburlo
The number 19 of the revised Area 51 (April 2007) reports a courageous service to the case study " Secretum Omega "; this affair was brought to public attention by freelance Cristoforo Barbato (Naples, 1972), UFO researcher and former editor at Rome for some glorious national magazines of ufology ( News UFO and Dossier Aliens, Stargate, Extra-Terrestrial and Stargate Magazine ). The service in question is signed by Stephen Panizza , who has previously published on-line at the exit of Area 51, at the site
www.centrostudifortiani.it
The Emilian Stephen Panizza (Parma, 1963) is responsible for External Relations of centrostudifortiani.it, a member of CUN (National UFO Center) and a member of the board of the "Cultural Center of Research Esobiologiche Galileo" in Parma.
LONDON, April 30, 2005: THE CASE SHOWS "secretum OMEGA" The service of Panizza is in my opinion fundamentally important for two reasons:
Is animated by a constructive criticism, and this is the first attempt of print (excluding my activities and to Barbato) to honestly discuss this sensitive case emerged April 30, 2005 at the Palace of the Province of Pescara, during a conference organized by the association " Ufobserver ", which was shown for the first time the novel and movie hot holding by Cristoforo Barbato, a young freelance reporter for a Neapolitan temperament assault of another era.
Movie, it should be noted that Barbato has not sold to anyone as far as I know, following the strict guidelines of its source, but I think that it could be viewed privately in his presence, request the same freelancer from experts in the field of space observations, and specialize in the infrared band of the electromagnetic spectrum. Experts from the proven credentials, of course, and they are really interested in helping the public and scientific research, because they are far from ideological alignments and cursed by the barons university games in which they must be to live with.
However we think Barbato to evaluate qualifications and motivations. I know him personally and has shown not only to assume its responsibilities, but above all not be a fool or a simpleton. I also seem to recall that precisely this willingness Barbato spoke at the conference From the UFO Planet X , took place Saturday, March 18, 2006 at the conference hall of Hotel Casier Casier (Treviso) conducting a marathon oratory incredible explained and said his research work from 17.30 pm to 22.30 pm approximately, pasting the chairs of the present stunned.
THE MEDIA ON THE "JESUIT FOOTAGE" CLASSIFIED "SECRETUM OMEGA"
The only opportunity for the public to see the mysterious and disturbing video remains therefore to participate in conferences to which Barbato is a guest speaker. If this choice of young freelancers do not release the video (in a sense forced by circumstances) seems unhappy for research fruitful and actually hinders the dissemination of the case, on the other side narrows the field of hypotheses: nobody can think it is a 'honest act orchestrated to make money by abusing popular credulity, because no commercial operation has been launched in this regard. And now they are almost two years after its disclosure, which in Italy is proceeding quietly, thanks also prints a bit 'distracted and submissive about it.
Abroad, however, there was more attention to the controversial case (see my comments in regard to the radio program Feet to the Fire in Chicago and recent publications of the Australian magazine Nexus : among them point out the interview with the Italian Jesuit made in 2001 by Barbato, published by that magazine world exclusive). No wonder: it confirms the poor position of Italy in the ranking of countries with more freedom of information ("42nd in the annual list compiled by Reporters Without Borders press freedom in the world . ", ANSA news of October 20, 2005).
We now come to the undersigned. It is now almost a year I am working through my investigative journalism and my outreach work of the controversial and difficult search of freelance Barbato and the vexed question of Planet X , which is the context in which s' insert the "Secretum Omega". For more maybe this escapes before the case was "Secretum Omega" a historical-crossed by scientific research, debate and differences of scientific opinion (even science is doxa, not episteme) on the existence of an additional solid member of the Solar System, known in antiquity and apparently unknown to modern astronomy.
I also baptized by " Jesuit Footage "video in possession of Barbato: this is a movie that contains some photographs taken by the alleged spacecraft Siloam , sent in the early 90s beyond the orbit of Neptune to monitor the 'closer to the Sun of the elusive Planet X ( Nibiru by the ancient Sumerians worshiped). The source of the movie, in fact, is an insider of the Holy See belonged to the Order of the Jesuits: this is the only certainty we have, thanks to painstaking inspections of Cristoforo Barbato (the verification of credentials, the insider was performed by Barbato but he, respecting ethics, protecting his source, do not forget, he risked his life by contacting Barbato and releasing the video file).
On the nature of this secret space mission and unofficial intelligence agency that was prepared (the Vatican Information Service, whose acronym, SIV), I refer to my previous writings and those of Barbato, available at its Web site ( www.secretum-omega.com ). It goes without saying that they are a preliminary to reading this article. In my piece I propose to take in the service of Panizza aspects that I find most salient and to counter the legitimate concerns raised by him. It is precisely by comparing, by critics and watching the events and testimonies from different perspectives, that the journalistic research (and others) can evolve and arrive at some certainty and some shared point. Aspects of the "Jesuit Footage" classified "Secretum Omega" are many: historical, religious, scientific, political, epistemological, especially intelligence ... A reflection on the background of thought that animates us, the way we look for connections between the various aspects of reality, it is fundamental to our vision of knowledge affected the glasses we wear and the theoretical perspectives we adopt.
The world we are describing is what we perceive, as said the French philosopher Merleau-Ponty. If we reject a priori evidence, facts, public information, documents and actions that do not fit our mental schemes, we have a distorted view of what the world as a chaotic ever-changing flaps which sometimes grasp of truth .
THE VIDEOTAPE OF THE "JESUIT FOOTAGE" BARBATO RECEIVED THE MAIL FOR THE YEAR 2000
First of all is given the right on Panizza for correcting a misstatement that I reported several times in recent months: the videotape sent by post to Cristoforo Barbato was from those received in 2000 and not, as I reported in 2001. My mistake, made in good faith, arises from the fact that the press release by Barbato in 2005 was not immediately clear the exact time of transmission of parcel within the history of correspondence between Cristoforo Barbato and "Deep Throat" in the Vatican who contacted him. I know that Barbato was consulted recently by Panizza about the exact year when he received the videotape. I, the rest , was mistaken not to pursue the matter further during the interview that the ufologist Naples kindly granted and that the magazine UFO News published a year ago (April 2006, nr.62). But do not change much of the history and facts appropriate for understanding "Secretum Omega" is almost irrelevant: a good thing only for food or sterile polemics historians of future generations. It remains exactly what I reported about the two meetings with the Barbato Italian Jesuit: they occurred in a place open to the public in the capital, in 2001. It is an act of faith to believe? If I had not had the opportunity over the years to personally experience the professionalism and intellectual honesty to Cristoforo Barbato, probably would not make much reliance on this testimony (cha still has a value), and I would focus more on the rest. But the fact remains that Barbato has provided the public a controversial case that the material is based on real, tangible, and inscribed in a geopolitical and d 'intelligence be investigated and that is understandable, albeit with difficulty. He then, very cautiously, for several years as a true scholar is conducting an extensive research on the subject, gradually brought to the public: a research their own party, by its own admission, his initial skepticism. This should be duly emphasized.
IMAGES FROM THE SPREAD OVER THE YEARS 1999-2000 FORGIONE
Now back all'articolista Stephen Panizza: another of his merit is, in my opinion, pointing out at the close of his piece (p. 31, Area 51 Nr.19) a reflection of significant which so far I have not focused enough: "[...] what mysterious bond exists between the photos of Forgione's letter and the movie Pattera Barbato, far apart in time and space and, perhaps, in different source of origin, but all having the common denominator of Siloam probe ... " Panizza refers to some extraordinary images of an unknown planet by the dense atmosphere, first published by the magazine Dossier Aliens Nr.20 (September-October 1999), and then a second time by the magazine Hera , founded and directed by Adriano Forgione (January 2000, No.1).
Pictures at the time already allocated, by the editors of these journals, the alleged spacecraft called "Shiloh". The source of images of anonymous then contacted the adviser Adriano Forgione, it must be said, is not the same that then subsequently contacted Cristoforo Barbato. Of this we are almost certain, since the same Jesuit, interviewed by Barbato on the material received in 1999 by Forgione, judged reliable images at first even though he had no knowledge of the origin (see about the interview with C. Barbato , UFO News nr.62, April 2006). Dutiful begin now to make some clarifications: After the service Panizza the preparation of Area 51 gives some guidance to readers rightly refers to Cristoforo Barbato site, stating: "The pictures taken Siloam by the probe can be found at the site of Cristoforo Barbato. " In fact, the information given by the magazine is misleading: are available at his site a few frames of the "Jesuit Footage", that is the movie showing a dense atmosphere taken by the planetoid in the deep space, beyond Neptune and Pluto. There is no question of images "taken", but to extract frames from a video montage of the alleged shooting space. The images published on p. 30 of the service, however, are almost certainly the original images (obtained by them through a downsizing) published by Forgione in 1999 and 2000.
In this case, the caption of Area 51 is correct: "[...] the two images by Adriano Forgione published the first issue of Hera." Moreover, the Artistic Director of Area 51 is Albert Forgione, brother Adriano Forgione. From what it shows? From the photographic quality of the planetoid, identical in form and detail, even though those published previously (7-8 years) seem more full of detail and nuance. Just get Hera No.1 to realize that maybe are not simple black and white images. It seems that there is more information of simple tones of gray. Area 51 in the journal but I think that the two images are in shades of gray, but these are the same, although slightly distorted from targeting picture frame.
FRAMES OF THE "JESUIT FOOTAGE" THE IMAGES AND DISTRIBUTED BY FORGIONE: PORTRAYING THE SAME CELESTIAL BODY AND COME FROM THE SAME SPACE PROBE?
The frames of the "Jesuit Footage" spread by Barbato are in black and white and depict different portions of the planetoid than outputs two images above. In fact, in black and white is the same movie, probably the result of a recovery made by the probe Siloam with a sophisticated infrared equipment, or a combination infrared / visible. Between the two anonymous sources (and that of Forgione to Barbato) I would give more credibility to the second, as Forgione has no more the cause for its source (which would prove to be "unreliable", as he himself said Forgione Nexus of the conference held in Abano Terme (Padova), in 26-27 October 2002
[1]), Cristoforo Barbato, however, it failed with craft and skill to meet face to face her, source, and give you well a name (he is hiding, claiming his duty / right of legal professional privilege).
This step is crucial to try to understand the case "Secretum Omega" and is, in my opinion, the pivot around which to organize a work of investigation and research. Then, the material of the two anonymous sources can be authentic in both cases. But the fact remains that I associate with more confidence to the probe Siloam movie Barbato rather than to images of Forgione: because if the two images presented in 1999 and in 2000 came from the probe Siloam, the Italian Jesuit would have known in some way , he having acted so as "loose cannon", but supported by a sort of fifth column within the SIV, the Vatican Information Service. If, as revealed in the interview Barbato (April 2006, UFO News) the same Jesuit did not know the provenance of the images broadcast by Forgione, it is clear that probably if the material is authentic, it comes from a different spacecraft on a mission secret. Also why Adriano Forgione, recalling his meeting in Rome in 1999 with former Sergeant Major Robert Dean of the U.S. Army, said this at the conference mentioned above that: "[...] Robert Dean ... I had worked at NATO ... he said it was rumored that the return [of Nibiru, LS] in 2003 (eravano nel'99) ... and NASA had made two photographs which were then immediately removed from the internet.
"[2] It seems that Forgione, in the words that he stated during his speech in Abano Terme, has deemed unreliable its source anonymous because he tried in vain to ricontattarla, but it vanished into thin air. Furthermore, according to Forgione, she never ever did "recognize", even with him. Little has been said on the way and then the time of their contacts. A certain difference between the patient and tireless work to Barbato, however, facilitated by the fact that the Jesuit Holy See (State of SIV) finally agreed to be recognized, even if only in front of Barbato. Forgione, probably, to make a judgment about the case would have to work harder on the material supplied to him, looking in the context of the scientific community of any discrepancies, and trace evidence with respect thereto. It may be that he has abandoned the delicate search for personal reasons, that we can not know. The fact that in 2003 no abnormal massive celestial body, orbiting like a comet, was seen with the naked eye or discussed publicly by the scientific community, does not mean that the testimony of Robert Dean is to be rejected in toto. Misinformation often deceives even the most seasoned professionals and former military, albeit in good faith. Just about Robert Dean I express myself in my recent article entitled "The intelligence and the contact", published in issue number 68 of UFO Newsletter (April-May 2007), to which I refer for further details on the figure of the American officer.
'll be back soon to speak of Forgione and his images, even in the pages of UFO News, arguing my conviction that in reality we are faced with more material from interplanetary probes: among these there is also the probable Siloam probe sent by the Vatican. As you would expect, in respect of this unusual celestial body approaching the Sun, along with the good offices of the Vatican there would have been the two greatest powers of the Earth (USSR and USA) and their respective space agencies, civilian and military , in classified operations at the highest levels. Now back to the service of Panizza out of Area 51 .
MY COMMENTS TO THE DOUBTS EXPRESSED BY PANIZZA (see Area 51 , Nr.19, p. 30-31)
First question : with respect to the alleged atmosphere of the planetoid shake, just a graduate student in astronomy (which keep the reserve) I did note that it is a possible sign of trust, as rightly emphasizes Panizza. Certainly, the probe will set up an extensive video material (photos and footage), but it is, let us not forget, classified. The "Jesuit Footage" is a montage video, not the whole folders along with documentation of the mission. But it is a definite advantage compared to only rumors. What we claim more from an insider of a structure of services that acted without an official order? Even agreeing to meet with Barbato (conditio sine qua non of Naples sets from freelance to pursue contacts) the Jesuit burned, exposing himself and the Holy See to possible thunderstorm winds. And who knows what price he paid in the first person to give the public a tangible sign of the delicate issue that concerns us all, without exception.
But do not believe that his action was not followed by some quarters and lay individuals in possession of information not in the public domain: among them, there will certainly be more than someone intimately torn by so-called morals of Antigone, as well as the are the "shrapnel" of SIV, pushed assume the voice of their conscience and a sincere desire to prepare people to global events. I hope that the gesture of the Jesuit and those who have abetted do understand that the diplomatic-political authority and wealth of knowledge of the Vatican can really be put at the service of humanity, if you want, regardless of creed religious, ideological and ethnic origin.
On this point well Panizza wrote at the close of his piece: if it's true "[....] we are dealing with an act of profound intellectual honesty, but also of terrible danger." I want also to remember the work of Karol Wojtyla who, during his pontificate, was a staunch opponent of totalitarianism (right and left), also asking for forgiveness for the many errors and massacres committed by the Church in past centuries. As stated by the Italian Jesuit front Barbato in a dramatic confession vis-à-vis it's hard to digest, especially when the deep throat says that John Paul II was a tenacious defender dell'ufficioso "information program" launched on the ET reality from certain Vatican circles.
Surprising and perhaps makes you smile, but not much remember the cryptic statements about the former American officer Robert Dean Montesilvano made in 2001 in a television interview made by Telemax (see my service on UFO News , nr.68). I hope that these leaks, from ancient institution, give the for the disclosure to other states. The recent initiative of the French GEIPAN bodes well.
2) Second question : The movie is a copy of classified material and is not true that the quality is bad. Panizza probably does not know the file size of the result in digital dubbing: it is a file of more than 80 megabytes (MB) , the product of a reversal of a digital VHS video that lasts little more than two minutes . The frames that make up the video are some thousands . I do not think that these data may justify the statement "the quality is bad." Sure, compared to the videotape provided the Vatican insider video quality is lower, as the same Barbato has admitted to me. But this depends on whether you need professional equipment to get a true copy, in digital form, the contents of the tape.
Equipment that does not have Barbato.
I have not had the chance to see the videotape but I know very well its reversal having watched several times: the first time, both publicly and privately with Barbato, was in Santa Maria Maddalena (RO). At the time I remained puzzled, especially for the job of presenting the video, which is essential to understand the scope of the question, which goes beyond the same movie. Movie on the veracity of which even Barbato put my hand on fire, but only because it has not received any official confirmation from any institution or government, and because they are not so far emerged sensational elements or authoritative evidence that can corroborate it. Affirm, however, with conviction that one can not treat the material result of a prank by kids. It is true that we live in the era of "finzionabile" where the boundaries between the fake and the real is always questioning, but the presentation of the entries with rating professionals, the flying object that appears and disappears near the planetoid and especially the source of the movie (a Jesuit working at the Holy See Vatican City), I think, could justify such a hypothesis. It is not true, as Panizza, that the material can not be analyzed. I wonder how many people have taken the opportunity to see the movie, offered by the conference to which he was invited Barbato (all made with free admission for the commitment of several organizers: the Ufobserver, the USAC, the undersigned, the CUN, etc ...).
Also an opportunity to converse directly with the Italian freelance and ascertain its seriousness. And how many people bothered to examine the frames to be released publicly Barbato? Something to work on, is already there. And much, for the future, depends on the accuracy and sensitivity of the public and the press, both national and foreign.
3) Third doubt : the Anglo-Saxon words COSMIC TOP SECRET , at the beginning of the "Jesuit Footage", is part of the classification used by NATO, and is the highest; Panizza wonder that is present in a video footage from an alleged intelligence agency of the Holy See, the thing, I say, not surprising as the secret services of the world often collaborate and exchange information, when the respective Governments have a good relationship and when there is a common threat (see the recent and controversial case of kidnapping by the CIA of an Islamic extremist operating in Italy, suspected of being the center of terrorism International). But there is a point on which we must think carefully: the Italian Jesuit, on the occasion of the interview given to Barbato in 2001, it is so expressed about the space probe Siloam and data transmitted by it: “[....] The data were received in Alaska in October 1995. Here began my problems. I discovered that I had to decrypt the data from the transmission session and created a dangerous situation. It was then that my contact told me that within the Vatican were living with two factions that vied for the management of a type of information with a level of secrecy far above TOP SECRET. "” (from ' interview with the Jesuit - © Copyright 2000-2006 Cristoforo Barbato).
In fact, in the "Jesuit Footage" is not an acronym which brings to SIV, because the only code that seems to be the establishment of reference is the ' SVS : a mysterious symbol above, in letters slightly larger, all classifications regarding the video in question and present at the beginning of the movie. Therefore, the Italian Jesuit of SIV which operates to the Holy See, and with purely technical positions ("the most important were such as to receive secret information from a radio telescope located in Alaska and the Vatican turn them to their recipients ..."), came across a data session is intended to others. This would explain the inconsistencies are encountered not only rightly be Panizza, but testify the underground internal conflicts that are shaking the Vatican and of which the public can only imagine the dramatic reasons, related to the survival of our civilization as we know it today. The positions, clerical and daughters of totalitarian ideologies, no need to understand the terms of this intricate question, but indeed, do nothing but distort and manipulate it.
The SVS, whatever it is, is a reality that perhaps transcends the Vatican itself, and that seems to involve a number of years some members of his high places, arousing the concern of those who are anchored to the body and spirit to the message Christic (I refer to members of the Vatican have "permission to the supervision referred to as' Secretum Omega ', which is the highest category of classification of secrecy in the Vatican equivalent of the' Cosmic Top Secret 'NATO', ibid.) Barbato so far gave no indication of the nature SVS, but this seems to have a conservative rather than a personal choice about his ignorance. He can not be wrong to view the lukewarm reception of the media. However, remember everyone that for years the existence of the Italian secret lodge called P2 ("Propaganda 2") was jealously guarded by its members, until a judicial inquiry did not lead her in broad daylight and decreed the dissolution, the early 80 (Government Spadolini). Do not be surprised if an alleged secret facility as the SVS, and the apparent trans-national character, has been able to stay in the shadows until now.
Fourth question : Panizza is skeptical that the probe has been sent by the Vatican Siloam built at Area 51. He has the impression that it wants to "put in the context of a piece that is part of the mysterious folklore." Certainly the area 51 is surrounded by folklore mysterious but it is a real physical place, the latitude and longitude are well known. She was photographed several times by Soviet and American satellites, and in recent years has been considerably extended. See about these satellite photos to the site of the FAS , the Federation of American Scientists, ( The Federation of American Scientists ), founded in 1945 by some scientists of the Manhattan Project, which since then have wanted to work for the progress of humanity, disclosing to the public their knowledge and experience. ( http://www.fas.org/irp/overhead/groom.htm ). Moreover, the Area 51 is a secret base against which, recently, the USAF ( the American Air Force) has denied writing to the History Channel as an official request for an interview with a spokesman. The reason? The operations that are conducted are "classified": classified. It has existed since the 50s of last century and is known by different expressions: Dreamland, Watertown Strip, Paradise Ranch, The Farm, The Box, Groom Lake . It is located in the United States of America, at Lincoln Couny, Nevada, and is the section of land of about 60 square miles and is part of the Nellis Air Force Range. It was also at the center, years ago, a lawsuit (filed with the U.S. District Court in Las Vegas) waged against the American government from the widows of some engineers who had worked there will remain mysteriously poisoned. Intoxication that, it would seem, was the cause of their death. There is nothing folkloric in a lawsuit, and the mysterious death of some people who worked in a military secret.
Fifth question : Panizza is skeptical about the real existence of a class of aircraft Aurora , an alleged aerospazioplano, and used as a carrier for the secret to orbit, to the early '90s, the probe Siloam, which would have "an electromagnetic pulse motor" ( Not UFO ., Secretum Omega , nr.62). Comment of the doubt by making Panizza Personal observations on a famous case of international news: the request for extradition from the United States British hacker Gary McKinnon teaches that technology alternative to burning (in field called new age with the term free energy) is considered a matter of maximum national security, along with sightings of UFOs in Space, called "Fastwalkers" in the jargon of NORAD. McKinnon has committed a crime and should be prosecuted. That's right, bearing in mind his motives and intentions, however (tried, according to his testimony, evidence about UFOs and suppressed technology). He was taken with great dignity and calm his responsibilities but the allegations made, discussing extensive damage to the computer systems of NASA and the U.S. defense, they are still all to try and have my opinion of spurious charges to divert the attention of media and the public would find out how McKinnon piercing illegally NASA computer networks: classified images (unprocessed and computationally) of mysterious objects in orbit around the Earth, attributable to the group of unidentified aerospace phenomena. Regard to the timing of the alleged spacecraft Siloam, and the research on propulsion magnetoplasma, Panizza invitation to (re) read my article "Indirect confirmation of Secretum Omega" released on UFO News no. 64, contained in a yellow box to pagg.42-43.
Sixth doubt : The Italian Jesuit has never suggested that the anomalous celestial body in question would have been visible since 2004, as claimed by Panizza. I quote from my service "Secretum Omega" in which the interview is rilasciatami by Cristoforo Barbato in the spring of 2006: “Barbato: [...] What I reiterated [Barbato is referring to the Jesuits, the Vatican deep throat] is that SIV in collaboration with Lockheed Martin, sent the probe that produced the image of a celestial body large that within three years at most, since 2001, would "feel" its presence in the solar system”. ( UFO Not. , nr.62, p.40) Question: We are under the effects of Global Warming or not? And along with the Earth, are they not been identified several anomalies in the atmospheres of planets in the Solar System? Please note that the information received from Barbato back to the years 2000-2001. The monthly Newton , in February 2007, it screams the headline over the cover: "Greenhouse Effect. Surprise: it is heating up the entire solar system. " On the possible cause of this "greenhouse interplanetary", in reference to the legitimate objections raised by Panizza, I recommend reading my article entitled “Anomalies in the solar system: the smoking gun of Planet X? “ soon to be released on the website of Christopher Barbato ( www.secretum-omega.com ).
Seventh doubt : Panizza proposes the hypothesis that the Jesuit would try to add credibility to their statements talking about the United States and their alleged contacts with aliens. But I retort inviting us to reflect on the reasons that have prompted some members of the SIV to seek a reliable contact with the media to reveal an uncomfortable truth but crucial for humanity. It is clearly said in the interview at Jesuit (2001), both in words Barbato published last year on UFO News nr.62. On information given by the Jesuit about an alleged meeting took place between the United States and an alien delegation President Eisenhower's invitation to contextualize everything has been rumored for decades that the involvement in this meeting (which would take place at Muroc Base in California in 1954) of the then Bishop of Los Angeles, James Francis McIntyre , then called to give a moral and spiritual support to the President. In this regard, it should read what he wrote Roberto Pinotti in his essay titled “UFO Top Secret” , Bompiani, 1995, p. 174-175. And of that alleged and secret meeting at Muroc Air Field between institutions and alien land, was already talking about the famous Peter Kolosimo in his Shadows on the Stars (SugarCo Editions, Milan, 1974, pag.235), even if he was referring to 1951, a date still wrong because at the time Eisenhower was still President. It is very disconcerting that a member of the Order of the Jesuits like to confirm everything adding new details. The value of his testimony, if anything, is enhanced and not diminished in my opinion, he comes from that environment in the past it would have been against their protagonists by listing specific dates, names and telling facts is that time, that becomes a bit 'of Order concerning a controversial case of record which the protagonist was the Chairman D. Eisenhower: his sudden absence of the night in one day in February 1954, and officially explained with an urgent visit to the dentist. I find that the voice of 'insider working at the highest levels of intelligence of the Holy See gives light and cast shadows on the matter. Reference to Cristoforo Barbato site for more information on the alleged landing at Muroc (now Edwards base). I close my service deepening thanking Stephen Panizza for having confronted squarely on pages of paper printed with the controversial case "Secretum Omega".
I invite the reader, whoever she or he is to read up and do not trust any of the interpretations and opinions (including mine), if not supported by reasoning and meticulous research literature and archivist of newspaper, extended in all directions. It is true that the information is always hidden from the public burning. It is the people who must make the effort to confront themselves with cutting-edge research and niche. The instruments (conventions, libraries, kiosks and the Internet) are available to all. This means being responsible citizens. Just want.
© Luke Scantamburlo April 15, 2007
[1] See the transcript of the speech on the subject of Adriano Forgione reported at the site www.thexplan.net/XPLAN.htm
[2] Ibid.
Update script and layout of images: 11 August 2007.
Reproduction is allowed on the Web if Accompanied by the statement
© L. Scantamburlo - www.angelismarriti.it
Reproduced by permission.
Comments