Wilton Windmill Crop Circle... Euler's Glyph

[Dianna Spencer]

Sorry if pictures did not post.

Crop Glyph as Man invents NEW Life Wilton Windmil Wiltshire

Reported 22nd May

Since its initial decoding by “Grail Seeker” one week ago (see psychedelicadventure or logosmythos.net), a new crop picture at Wilton Windmill on May 22, 2010 has literally astonished the world (see www.telegraph.co.uk or lucypringle.co.uk).

However, one mathematician from University College in London was quoted as saying: “Looking at the crop circle, its link with Euler’s famous identity seems to make perfect sense. Yet the way in which the formula has been executed is partly incorrect. One of its discrepancies is that part of the formula translates as ‘hi’ rather than ‘i’, which could be somebody’s idea of a joke” (see independent.co.uk). Thus the academic classes on Earth today still do not believe what is right in front of their faces.

Here we will resolve that important issue, by reporting on the detailed nature of a second hidden code within the 96-digit binary ASCII message shown at Wilton Windmill. The possibility of a second code at Wilton Windmill seems perfectly obvious, since there were two extra codes buried within the 1386-digit binary ASCII message which appeared at Crabwood in 2002 (see time2007n or time2007o). Some basic mathematical observations are summarized below:

The primary ASCII code shown at Wilton Windmill contained 96 binary digits, as 12 ASCII characters of 8 binary digits each. And it gave a close approximation to Euler’s Identity from advanced mathematics. Yet it also contained nine anomalous binary digits, if we take a precise difference between what we would expect for Euler’s Identity, and what was actually observed!

Those nine anomalous digits equal 011010001 or 011-010-001 in octal base-eight meaning “3-2-1”. The usual way to read unformatted binary is to take a square root of the total number of digits, then read in groups equal to that square root. For example here we have 9 anomalous digits, so we can read in groups of 3; whereas at Crabwood in 2002 we had 25 anomalous digits, so we could read there in groups of 5.

What might this new hidden code from Wilton Windmill mean? Clearly it would appear to represent a countdown of some kind, since Euler’s general formula resembles a “clock” more than anything else in mathematics. Likewise the four vanes of a nearby windmill would seem to suggest “a clock hand turning”. And when the hands of that clock reach an angle equal to 180 degrees, or pi in radians, then Euler’s general formula goes to zero as for Euler’s Identity:

3-2-1-(0)

After some discussion with my colleagues, a general consensus seems to be that we may be approaching the end of an age in late 2012. In other words, those crop artists seem to be reminding us that there are now only three years left until the Mayan Fifth Sun ends in December of 2012, and a new Sixth Sun begins:

2010 (3) - 2011 (2) – 2012 (1) – 0

CMM Research (with thanks to Marina and Mike) 29/05/2010

A new crop picture at Wilton Windmill on May 22, 2010 showed the famous "Euler Identity" from complex mathematics in 8-bit ASCII computer code

A new crop at Wilton Windmill on May 22, 2010 broke new grounds of expression between the crop artists and ourselves, in terms of the sophistication and coding level of their message. Thus it showed a series of 12 x 8 binary digits in standard 8-bit ASCII code (see ASCII), repeated in duplicate within various parts of the message. When translated into modern English, those 96 binary digits give the result:

e ^ (hi)pi) 1 = 0

On our planet, the famous "Euler Identity" from complex mathematics is often written in abbreviated form as (see Euler's_identity):

e ^ (i pi) + 1 = 0

Thus their crop-based message shows two slight differences from what we call the "Euler Identity". First, it does not seem to contain a "plus sign" on the right. Yet if those crop artists were not perfectly familiar with all aspects of our ASCII code, they could easily have written "right parentheses" for "plus" by a single one-bit error. In which case, the crop formula would become:

e ^ (hi)pi + 1 = 0

which is a close fit to our Euler Identity. The second difference is that they seem to write our complex imaginary symbol "i" as "hi".

Many modern scientists and mathematicians regard that Euler Identity to be the "most beautiful mathematical formula ever" (see Leonhard_Euler), or the "greatest equation ever" (see Euler's_identity). It follows as a special case from Euler's more general formula:

e ^ (i x) = cos (x) + i sin (x)

when x = pi. Please look at this great video which explains everything: see www.youtube.com.

"Beautiful!" the author writes there. Yes, it is a simple equation of great mathematical beauty, which is used today in everything from x-ray crystallography to engineering to DNA. And the crop artists showed it to us in a field of oilseed rape in southern England on May 22, 2010. If we cannot now appreciate the great beauty of their high intelligence, and their yearnings to make contact with other advanced scientists or mathematicians on Earth (for whom it was clearly meant), then our local, often-struggling human race here will be the worse for it.

UPDATE:- 25/05/2010

Other mathematical equations related to Euler's Identity

A professional mathematician whom I work with pointed out that "Euler's Identity" is just one of many related equations, some of which are listed below:

e (i 0) - 1 = 0

e (i pi / 2) - i = 0

e (i pi) + 1 = 0 < Euler's Identity (crop picture)

e (3 i pi / 2) + i = 0

e (2 i pi) - 1 = 0

e (5 i pi / 2) - i = 0

(with thanks to M.B.)

CMM Research

===================

UPDATE:- 25/05/2010

A little further research into a possible DNA-connection lead to this little collage (props to Richard Amber for pointing at Euler's formula for a general angle). Visualized in 3D it's a vortex, connecting it to the windmill, our DNA and even the solar system when viewing it's trace through space and time. The question which remains is: why is there an error in the binary ASCII code? (segment H1, 00101001 = ')', not 00101011 = '+') - is it intended to be fixed by adding a line to the crop circle?

It’s just a hunch, but I wouldn’t be one bit surprised if this somehow relates to the fact that we have just created actual artificial life for the first time. For those that missed it - just Google it. It’s been all over the news on the 22^nd - same date. This one from the BBC - science_and_environment

“For the first time ever, we are truly “playing God” , was the quote from one of the scientists. Artificially created DNA was placed in a separate bacteria and we literally created a new organism.

Now, if the circle makers saw enough importance and relevance in the Swine Flu virus to give us an impression of that last year, how much more important is the fact that we have now “created life” and made ourselves “like unto God”? Virtual “gods”, as it were. To quote Dr Frankenstein, “It lives! It lives!”

Scary stuff... Without a doubt. And a bona fide milestone.

Such a step might surely elicit comment from our friends, it is more than reasonable to suspect.

I see the initial CD impression. But then I see slices, a pizza with 12 slices - to be read either in sequence (where is the starting point?) or - and I have a real “urge” to do this - to stack them, one on top of the other. I don’t know why.

And I also see, not slices, but “rays” emanating out from the centre and a curious 3D effect, I think. I also want very much to spin it. To centre Andreas Mueller’s diagram and make it spin. Very evenly, set times and revolutions. Very visual I suspect. Even hypnotic...?

Also, from the aerial shots, there appears to be a weave or patterning in the wide, outer, main ring.

Thank you to those on the ground and in the air.

Sources: http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2010/wilton/comments.html

Administrative Note: There is MUCH MUCH more knowledgable insights in the link above. It is important to document this phenomenon, and this glyph in particular now, because of the anouncement of Human Creation of "NEW" life on same day of Glyph.

[edina]

Hi Dianna, this is dense material, I'd like to know what you think of it, especially since you shared it.
Do you follow the mathematics on this? I do not, at least, not yet. Do we have mathematical people here who could help us understand this better?

The link works, and there is a great deal more information on the site. It seems significant. I'm hoping somewhere will add more insights on this to help me understand it better. I'll be checking back in on this latter on.