NOTICE TO THOSE LINKING FROM LOTHAR'S "SOMETHING TO LAUGH ABOUT" LINK. YOU DON'T HAVE TO OBEY HIS COMMAND TO "DO NOT REPLY." WE PRACTICE FREE SPEECH HERE. JUST REMEMBER TO BE CIVIL AND PRACTICE THE GOLDEN RULE, AND REPLY IF YOU SO DESIRE. IN THIS CASE, TRUTH ISN'T A LAUGHING MATTER. ODD HE WOULD LINK YOU TO THE PROOF THAT SHOWS HE IS STILL A NANCY DEVOTEE. HE HAS QUESTIONABLE JUDGMENT.
Greetings. This message is to set the record straight on a number of erroneous postings on your (Lothar's) website at http://www.schwarztech.at/.
Readers, in the first image below, please direct your attention to the right-hand column, where Lothar makes public his and Vickie's suspensions. Now, what purpose does Lothar have to publicly proclaim his suspension from this group? Presumably, to make me out to be some kind of bad guy. I rarely suspend, and if I do, it is for cause well verified. Those who have been around for a while know this. I made no public mention of his suspension, but he has chosen to make it public. Why? Because he has an agenda, the same agenda with which he joined our group. Suspension, in his mind, equates to insanity. Of course, when he did it freely at poleshift.ning (and made many enemies in the process) it was perfectly reasonable.
I'd also like to point out that his blog was not "suspended." I usually leave content intact whenever I have to suspend someone, letting them decide whether they want to delete their content or not. I did so in all the recent suspensions, pending final resolution. Lothar made a free-will choice to delete his content after he was suspended. It could have stayed as a testimony against Nancy's fraud, but he chose to remove it (notice he scrubbed the exact link to it) and, instead, use it as a weapon against me. So, maybe he's not the outspoken critic of Nancy that he wants everyone to think he is.
Also note, in the left column above are SOHO images of the "winged globe" already debunked as Planet X (ever seen a planet shoot a beam before?), so he is still promoting Nancy's belief that the winged object, seen in many SOHO images of yesteryear, is Planet X, which has also been debunked as not being between the Earth and the Sun. So, strike one, Lothar.
In this next image, in the right column, you will see that Lothar now advertises that our group and Nancy's group are "highly dangerous" and "The two most dangerous sides (sites) on the web." I personally think child porn rings on the web are more dangerous, along with financial scams, etc.
I have to ask Lothar what his definition of "dangerous" is. The only thing "dangerous" about our group is for Nancy's spies getting caught. And, if we are so dangerous to the public, then Lothar needs to explain his multi-daily visits to our group. Plus, we don't base our site on the questionable telepathic communications of one woman. We look at many points of view. We tell people to do their own independent research and think for themselves. And that's dangerous? According to Nancy it is. Strike Two.
Further, Lothar, you are ill-informed about my status with $cientology. I haven't been a member of $cientology since 1991. That's 21 years out, with a long period of inactivity before that. Did you know, Lothar, that after I departed that group that I was an activist against Scientology and that I worked in litigation against the evil empire for a number of years? Did you know I worked with an attorney who worked with Ursula Caberta (of your country) against $cientology in Germany, and I met her when she came to the states? I know you use my former affiliation with $cientology, just like Nancy does (Strike Three), to make it appear that there is something wrong with me, I must be crazy because I "am in" $cientology. But I'm not in $cientology. You should do your homework before you defame people. Oh, I'm sorry, but that was your intent, wasn't it? You knew that, already. Truth has nothing to do with it.
This next image has a number of points I will address. The first one is directly beneath the Earthchanges logo, "Cheryl Nelson suffers from severe paranoia."
Lothar, are you a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist legally authorized to render a diagnosis? That's what you are doing. I know I have played arm-chair psychologist with Nancy, but I will distinguish what I do with what you've done. First, I've had 80-hours of classroom training in mental illness delivered by a multi-disciplinary psychiatric team at a mental hospital where I worked, plus experience working with geriatric patients. I have also worked with Nancy. That doesn't give me the authority to render an official diagnosis, of course; however I can state a well-informed opinion. Further, I submit my opinion as opinion, based on personal experience, training, and experience.
You, however, don't have any training or experience (from what I know of you), yet you have labeled me with a diagnosis and offered up a blog I wrote as "proof" of insanity. Further, you have never worked with me or had any interactions more than passing comments on the forums, so you don't know me at all. In saying what you say, you are just regurgitating Nancy, who has made that claim for years. So, you still sound like Nancy. Strike three.
Your next statement, "as is evident in her latest masterpiece" is offered as your "proof" of my "insanity." First, you have violated copyright laws by copying my blog to your site without permission. You come from a culture of thieves who take what they want at will (poleshift.ning.com) and show blatant disrespect for the law. I herewith demand it be removed immediately.
Second, your attempt at using my blog as a diagnosis of paranoia is laughable. I have abundant documentation that show solid reasons for taking the actions I took. Since when does good management translate into insanity? If so, then all management everywhere is insane. Further, "the last message to her members" is erroneous, as well. I have posted much since that blog. What is the purpose of that statement? To sway people to believe that I went paranoid and spun around in circles until I was put into a mental hospital? Very reminiscent of Nancy's insane rantings about me. Strike four. Lothar, posting crap like that makes you look crazy.
You said, "Thanks for the suspension," and I say, "You're welcome. You earned it." You were trying to be a deep mole, pretending to be with us, yet working against us behind our backs, so you thought.
And your sarcasm about your donation is unfounded as well. First, I wasn't running a campaign for donations, thus I didn't know you had made a contribution, as I don't use PayPal much. If I had seen it earlier, I would have immediately returned it since (a) I wasn't running a campaign and wasn't in need of funds, and (b) money coming from a psning mod, especially you with your reputation, would have been considered suspect. You proved my suspicion correct. It was a trap to somehow trip me up, make me think you were sincere, more "deep mole" covering. Alas, we have sensitive people that knew from the get-go something was up with you, and I'm one of them.
Oh, and by the way. You were banned on August 23rd and the refund was made on August 25th when I happened to link to your site and discovered your "issue." Rather than bleating sarcasm on your site that I may or may see, it would have been more efficient to have mentioned it in your email to me inquiring as to why you were suspended. But you chose not to; rather you wanted to make an issue of it, to try to get people to think I'm a thief. However, I'm not and here's the proof.
So, your donation has been refunded and you need to remove your erroneous sarcasm from your website, otherwise it will be construed as intentional defamation, just like Nancy. Strike Five.
Another erroneous statement on your site is, "The reason for the demise of both Ladies and their web pages are the same. Both, Nancy Lieder and Cheryl Nelson, are channeling the zeta reticulans." As many times as you have visited this site and viewed just about every blog and discussion here, you know my group is not her group. You know that, Lothar. Many of the members of earthchanges.ning know that. Your statement is simply not true. And her site appears to be still up and running, and my site has been for two years without interruption, despite yours and your colleagues' efforts.
Before I close, I want to mention some things I noticed that are now gone from your website, since you've been outed as a Nancy spy and you no longer need to pretend. This first image shows that you used to say: "Cheryl Nelson's Page top content, well informed." A bit of a discrepancy, wouldn't you say? Ah, but I forget, the gig is up. You don't have to lie to the world any more that my site has top content, well informed. It was okay to deceive people back when you were trying to deceive me and the members here, right? Or maybe that was the truth, and what you're saying now is the lie? Which is it, Lothar?
This next and last image shows how gung-ho you were to distance yourself from Nancy and Gerard back then, but now that you don't have to pretend any longer, you removed this content about them...
Gerard is not STS. Caring for one's ailing family is a very STO activity. (BTW, I do the same for my family.) And it is more demanding than working as a wage slave, wouldn't you agree, where you aren't on-call 24/7?
So, Lothar, the motto below your picture should be changed to, "Keeping you misinformed," don't you think? After all, you're just forwarding Nancy and her Zetatalk while saying you aren't. Isn't that plagiarism? Yes, but it doesn't matter as long as you're working for her, right?
One last question. It makes no sense to do this heavy-duty NL/GZ/psning bashing if you're still with them. Unless, of course, the Zetas will later say it was another white lie necessary to demise an enemy. However, there is another possibility, if you really aren't with her any longer. Maybe, Lothar, you are a government ops trying to demise both nings. Hmm. That's what you are saying. No one in their right mind should trust your words on the PX/earthchanges subject. And speaking of words, that's all you offer, Lothar. Empty words. No proof. Just like Nancy. Strike Six, and your outed. However, I always offer proof to back up what I say. Batting 1.0000.
It will be interesting to see how this evolves. So, Earthchangers, now you see the reason for the lockdown and suspensions. Lothar wasn't working alone. If you didn't read all the parts of the Rebuttal Update, Nancy clearly states her plan for our ning... its demise. Sneaking someone in here to try to become a mod. Deleting this ning... Here, let me let her tell you herself... Second paragraph starts: "There are multiple prongs in the operation by which this ning will meet its demise." She goes on to say that a group called "the new MJ12" (but in reality they are Puppet Master employees in the main) "... are likely to exacerbate any negative trend, creating uproar but in a factual way so that banning them is not done immediately." Think of their people like "Larry" and "Paul Kelly," and Amrah, a sleeper cell who awakened when Lothar appeared.
Next, Nancy, via her ZetaTalk, goes into more details, about the spies she's had here "not visible as obvious candidates" (hence the occasional cullings). She goes on to say "But one of these individuals is not truly her friend, but a doubt (double) agent who will use his power to gut her ning of content when the time comes. Deleted blogs and discussion cannot be recovered, it is known."
Interestingly, the great 300-account-deletion event that Nancy labeled a CIA event turned out to be KH deleting the 300 accounts, according to Co S's document. A karma boomerang. Well, we (the original mods of psning) tried to tell her about KH, but she wasn't listening.
So, there you have it folks. The reason Lothar & Company were here. The reason for the cullings. And the beat goes on.
And, since Lothar, etc., are "puppet master employees" that must mean Nancy is the Puppet Master.
Note: After publication, some revisions were made.
Bold is new text.
Italics are edited text.
Comments
I consider Nancy as a fool. Her Zeta still think aircraft hit the TwinTowers? And Obama is a Star Child?
And she makes no mention of the CME's that can fry a human brain.
Someone is using her, prolly the Nwo ELITES!
Excellent work Cheryl
Yes, we are a family of sorts here and will remain so! We are not filled with hateful tirades that Nancy and the gang have. This is a true STO site and they can keep their STS crap on their ning as long as they choose. I do hope that the innocents there get out before she beats them down!
Well said, Weiynala.
Thanks for the offer, Aurora. I don't wish any of them ill. I just hope that showing the truth will wake them up.
What some folks will do to get some attention! These two are just pretenders, and unfortunately those that follow them will fnd out they are being duped. Also, do you want me to put a hex on them, LOL just kidding!
Seriously, Cheryl you need not defend yourself against idiots. Ignore them. Smart folks know the wheat from the chaff.
Be well
Wow! I had a back seat feeling when Lothar came, could not get into the discussions that was being discussed. Just went to other discussions.
Great Works Cheryl
The hair on your back must of been standing tall waiting for the rope to be given enough length so they can hang themselves.
The Great Spirit Love All!
Edit: "already debunked as a spacecraft" read ambiguously, so I changed it to, "already debunked as Planet X (ever seen a planet shoot a beam before?),"
There's some other edits... just scan the blog if you're interested.
Added to the second paragraph (in bold), after the original publication:
I'd also like to point out that his blog was not "suspended." I usually leave content intact whenever I have to suspend someone, letting them decide whether they want to delete their content or not. I did so in all the recent suspensions, pending final resolution. Lothar made a free-will choice to delete his content after he was suspended. It could have stayed as a testimony against Nancy's fraud, but he chose to remove it (notice he scrubbed the exact link to it) and, instead, use it as a weapon against me. So, maybe he's not the outspoken critic of Nancy that he wants everyone to think he is.
Thanks, Weiynala. I appreciate all you have done and all you will do. This is no pissing contest. Part of my mission is to expose a little piece of the darkness. Many good people are caught up in it and need to see the light so they can ascend. There's so little time left.
The truth is, if Nancy had gotten what she wanted, this website would have closed its doors two years ago. This ning was, is, and will always be protected by those of the light.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next