http://www.wnd.com/2014/01/voter-obamas-an-enemy-combatant/
Forget impeachment. Arrest him for treason, give him a fair trial and, if found guilty, he gets the punishment. Don't waste time on trying to impeach him. Let's face it, if the U.S. could get its hands on Edward Snowden, he wouldn't even get the fair trial.
Comments
Yes, time is growing short. As you see below, cursory research shows we have a serious problem. But it also shows we have the power to do something about it. Take the power away from the enemies in D.C. and prosecute them for treason and other charges.
Here are some excerpts regarding Treason from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Treason
Treason is "the betrayal of one's own country by waging war against it or by consciously or purposely acting to aid its enemies."
Under Article III, Section 3, of the Constitution, any person who levies war against the United States or adheres to its enemies by giving them Aid and Comfort has committed treason within the meaning of the Constitution. The term aid and comfort refers to any act that manifests a betrayal of allegiance to the United States, such as furnishing enemies with arms, troops, transportation, shelter, or classified information. If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of the United States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and comfort has been given.
The Treason Clause applies only to disloyal acts committed during times of war. [We have been at war with "terrorism" since just after 9-1-1. There is prima facie evidence that substantial money ($200 Million] was given to the Muslim Brotherhood, a known terrorist organization, during this time of war.]
Under Article III a person can levy war against the United States without the use of arms, weapons, or military equipment. [By the power of the pen and by use of intimidation, the current POTUS has subverted the US Constitution.]
Treason may be proved by a voluntary confession in open court or by evidence that the defendant committed an Overt Act of treason. Each overt act must be witnessed by at least two people, ....
Because treason involves the betrayal of allegiance to the United States, a person need not be a U.S. citizen to commit treason under the Constitution. [There is prima facie evidence that the current POTUS is not a U.S. citizen, however, if he is found to be a non-citizen he can still stand for treason charges.]
Persons who owe temporary allegiance to the United States can commit treason. Aliens who are domiciliaries of the United States, for example, can commit traitorous acts during the period of their domicile. [By occupying the office of POTUS, the current occupant owes at least a temporary allegiance to discharge his duties faithfully.]
Treason is punishable by death. If a death sentence is not imposed, defendants face a minimum penalty of five years in prison and a $10,000 fine (18 U.S.C.A. § 2381). A person who is convicted of treason may not hold federal office at any time thereafter. [Only the person convicted of treason pays the penalty, not any family members. However, there is prima facie evidence that the wife knew he was not qualified to hold the office of POTUS, having stated that he was born in Kenya, and also by being educated as a lawyer and knowing the laws of the land. She, too, should be investigated as an accomplice in the usurpation.]
I think this is a job that the military has to accomplish for us, since people are waking up to slowly. I do not expect any divine intervention. I won't even read the channels anymore. After watching the SOTU it made me realize how dangerous things could become soon and because the financial news is so grim all over the world our time to do something is running out. We could be very close to Martial law. I know our politicians are paid off but also believe they have been blackmailed. If only we could get media to tell the truth we could win quickly. Our congress is under the control of Zionism and Israel even brags about it. I really think our battle will go to the streets. I wish I thought different.
So, Obama and his administration, as well as the US Congress, only have power because The People have granted it to them. Currently, it is obvious that they are at war with the people. For that reason, it is now time for The People to renounce that power on the grounds of corruption and treason. A vote of no confidence is more potent than just starting dialogue. It is a renunciation of the power granted by The People to those governing us. By revoking their power, they become average citizens again. They no longer have political shields and power. So, POTUS can't hide behind a senate that won't find him guilty of impeachment because he owns them. He can stand trial like any other person, for treason, derilection of duty, graft, corruption, etc.
Just my opinion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_revolution
I've read that the Declaration of Independence was based on John Locke's works.
Individual or collective right
Although some explanations of the right of revolution leave open the possibility of its exercise as an individual right, it was clearly understood to be a collective right under English constitutional and political theory.[6] As Pauline Maier has noted in her study From Resistance to Revolution, “private individuals were forbidden to take force against their rulers either for malice or because of private injuries....”[7] Instead, “not just a few individuals, but the ‘Body of the People’ had to feel concerned” before the right of revolution was justified and with most writers speaking of a “ ‘whole people who are the Publick,’ or the body of the people acting in their ‘public Authority,’ indicating a broad consensus involving all ranks of society.”[8]
The concept of the right of revolution was also taken up by John Locke in Two Treatises of Government as part of his social contract theory. Locke declared that under natural law, all people have the right to life, liberty, and estate; under the social contract, the people could instigate a revolution against the government when it acted against the interests of citizens, to replace the government with one that served the interests of citizens. In some cases, Locke deemed revolution an obligation. The right of revolution thus essentially acted as a safeguard against tyranny.
Locke affirmed an explicit right to revolution in Two Treatises of Government: “whenever the Legislators endeavor to take away, and destroy the Property of the People, or to reduce them to Slavery under Arbitrary Power, they put themselves into a state of War with the People, who are thereupon absolved from any farther Obedience, and are left to the common Refuge, which God hath provided for all Men, against Force and Violence. Whensoever therefore the Legislative shall transgress this fundamental Rule of Society; and either by Ambition, Fear, Folly or Corruption, endeavor to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other an Absolute Power over the Lives, Liberties, and Estates of the People; By this breach of Trust they forfeit the Power, the People had put into their hands, for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the People, who have a Right to resume their original Liberty.”[9]
Duty versus right
Some philosophers argue that it is not only the right of a people to overthrow an oppressive government but also their duty to do so. Howard Evans Kiefer opines, "It seems to me that the duty to rebel is much more understandable than that right to rebel, because the right to rebellion ruins the order of power, whereas the duty to rebel goes beyond and breaks it."[10]
Morton White writes of the American revolutionaries, "The notion that they had a duty to rebel is extremely important to stress, for it shows that they thought they were complying with the commands of natural law and of nature's God when they threw off absolute despotism."[11] The U.S. Declaration of Independence states that "when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government" (emphasis added). Martin Luther King likewise held that it is the duty of the people to resist unjust laws.
Here is a list of causes why America declared its independence from England... from http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/document/:
The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them. [He has intimidated Governors who refuse to follow his laws.]
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within. [His dismantling of our military, especially our nuclear officers is leaving us exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without. The same is true of his allowing open borders.]
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands. [Amnestizing illegal aliens might be a reverse, but just as destructive, of this complaint.]
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers. [He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by intimidating judges, and by using DOJ chief Eric Holder to stonewall true justice.]
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. [Judges are being intimidated. Witness no birther cases being decided.]
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance. [Czars, IRS harassment, ObamaCare, etc.]
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures. [Department of Homeland Security has been militarized, to the point of a retired Army Captain demanding Congress to force DHS to turn over their weapons of war to the military. Also, the militarization of local police departments. Ignoring posse comitatus.]
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power. [Via DHS and police departments and TSA, as above.]
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: [Trying to subvert the 2nd Amendment by signing the small firearm treaty with the U.N., giving away national parks to the jurisdiction of the U.N.]
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us: [Foreign troops on our soil, Russian & Chinese, etc.]
For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world: [Allowing US jobs to be shipped offshore.]
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent: [ObamaCare penalties, promising no new taxes and giving us lots of new taxes]
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury: [Patriot Act, NDAA, Gitmo]
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments: [Violating the US Constitution]
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. [Sidestepping Congress, making war without permission, Executive Orders]
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us. [Favoring Muslim terrorists, economically attacking Americans]
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. [While we have not yet devolved into violence, his continued actions is leading in that direction. Pre-violence, he has economically destroyed the lives of our people.]
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation. [He has allowed foreign troops on US soil, he is giving preference to illegal aliens over citizens, he is aiding terrorists while pretending to fight terrorism (using TSA to intimidate Americans in the pretextual war)]
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands. [By use of intimidation, he has caused judges to ignore just laws creating harm to citizens.]
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions. [Gov't disinformation and spying (NSA), allowing foreign troops on US soil, agents provocateurs at protests (Occupy Wall Street, protests, etc.)]
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
There are many other Acts against the US that he is guilty of, such as Fast & Furious, Benghazi, Seal Team Six national security breaches, using the IRS to bash political enemies, etc.
As you can see, he is a Tyrant and it is our right and duty to do something about it. The Declaration of Independence doesn't specifically state violent or non-violent means, but we can look to the Founding Fathers and see that if violence is a necessary means, then it should be employed.
It is ludicrous that a person could usurp the office of POTUS and no one can touch him. The reason being he has intimidated all who could. So, it's up to the people. It's in the Declaration of Independence...
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government....
...
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Exactly the way to do it.