You need to be a member of Earthchangers College to add comments!

Join Earthchangers College

Comments

  • Awfully Clear water they should have thousands of pictures by now mapping it all out, /sigh i expect too much from professionals.

  • Yes, it is a contradiction, isn't it, Preston?  One one hand, she uses it to deflect questions, while on the other she publishes "mod ZT" that "worries about stuff like" this site, to keep her mods under her thumb.  Oh, she'll say they have to because we are a threat, while calling us the TINY TINY ning on GLP.  She is a study in contradictions.  Of course, aren't all liars?

  • yeah thats what I mean - often times someone will ask a question about (whatever) in a ZT chat for next week, and they will get rude an abrupt responses saying "why worry about stuff like this when the important thing is the poleshift!"

    Then we see stuff like that written, which is an inherent contradiction by herself and her message. Shrug

  • I bother because it shows what lies beneath the charade.  It is not an STO outfit (speaking of the management).  I don't know why they bother, except that the top bow-wow is mentally ill. 

  • Hey Cheryl, that ZT you posted below had me thinking. Does that not go directly against other claims made on the PS ning? It has nothing to do with the pole shift or surviving, so why bother? I often times see these same comments made towards others who ask questions

  • Yep, definitely do your own research. I don't know what nancy is all about. I have been reading ZT since 2002, i find some stuff i resonate with for sure, but that does not mean she is channeling anything at all. Who knows! I've also had some mean words directed towards myself from her which shocked me quite a bit..but that's all water under the bridge, don't care.

    I am simply saying, judging from the artists rendition - it does indeed look like a print of something. This was said in ZT. It is a possibility, and heck (I just said heck?), if it is indeed that how exciting would that be? Though, i doubt it will ever be admitted 

  • Well, Nancy might be right, since it appears that she gets information from certain government agencies.  However, since the object has not been cracked open or MRI'd, it is all still speculation. 

    JAK, do your own research.  Never rely on someone else "sounding like they know what they are talking about."  Nancy puts on a good show, but is erroneous many times.  (No offense Preston, just our policy here.)

    I also want to remind everyone that it is Nancy's stated goal to have her people here who are not obvious Nancy devotees.  Let's not forget what she's said...

    2967659239?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024Again, no offense to either JAK or Preston, but when someone puts into writing their intent like Nancy has, we will jump on anything that even smells of that intent.  Just to let Nancy & Co. know we haven't forgotten.

  • Thanks Preston! It sounds like you know what you are talking about. I can go with that.

  • Thanks, Preston.  It's hard to tell photoshop from the real thing.  It definitely looks like something that was covered over.

  • Yep, there are a few choices here. And if it is indeed an actual structure and not a print of something, then scientists will have to either admit that:

    A. Humans (or another intelligent species) existed on the earth millions of years ago, when the baltic sea would have been dry land or

    B. The land regularly shifts into great upheavals, bringing the age of the anomaly closer to us

    But honestly, these pictures whether they are real or the closest rendition of the actual object, do resemble what Nancy said over a year ago. That a ufo slid along the baltic sea bottom, and when it came to a halt, the sea floor muck and debris piled up underneath and solidifed due to the heat of the craft, essentially creating a 'print'. 

    Just something to think aboot!

This reply was deleted.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives