Debunking Isostatic Rebound

For over 100 years we have had to deal with a scientific falsity namely Isostasy. I would like to have your support in getting this false theory debunked in short order. It has been allowed to exist for too long and it is false science. It cannot be allowed to continue. I am asking only that you think through the evidence and see that the whole premiss of Isostasy was derived from a misinterpretation of Charles Darwin. In his age there were other thinkers and tinkerers who lived in that less enlightened age. When Darwin made his observation of what he termed "Raised Beaches" he thought that the land mass had risen from the sea because he saw sea fossils high up on the shoreline above sea level. He thought as we all did that sea level was a constant. We still have that mindset today when we are told that sea levels are rising. When we are told by the media hype that sea levels are rising they are inferring that sea levels are rising above the level that it has always been throughout history. ( Are you follwowing me so far?) That is the major mistake that Darwin made. He thought that the land was rising when in fact it was the sea that was deserting the land mass; receding if you will. Other thinkers of the day jumped on to Darwins mistake and formulated the Isostatic Rebound Theory. They stated that "The reason that the land was rising is because the Ice Age had depressed the land and now that the Ice had melted the land was rebounding"

Darwin was wrong it was the sea that was receding and still is today. So we have to deal with Isostatic Rebound and get it removed from the lexicon of Geology. Please support the Initiative.

See The Mysterious Receding Seas" on Google and Youtube. Richard Guy Email: richardguy9@gmail.com.

Tel 867-445-8012.  Web Page: https://xbraille.wix.com/receding-seas ;

Author of "The Mysterious Receding Seas" "The Ascent of Man: Downhill all the Way"  " Is Planet Earth Expanding?"

Oasis Lecturer, Structural Engineer, West London U. UK.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Earthchangers College to add comments!

Join Earthchangers College

Comments

  • Hmm.  We had a guy a while back who insisted his theory was the essence of simplicity.  I guess this is just over our heads?  We're not a techie kind of group.

  • My statement is the essense of simplicity. What happens here on earth happens on other planets in the cosmos. They expand, they have earthquakes and now they have found evidence that bodies of water once existed on Mars.

    Isostatic Rebound does not occur on any other planet but expansion does DUH?? does that not seem to be cause enough to look more carefully at what we term Isostatic Rebound. Should not we try to see if what I am saying has merit. I stand by my treatise which I first wrote in 1980 in the Expanding Earth Magazine in California. My treatise is still to be seen in the Archives of : www.expanding-earth.org . Everything I say points to the errors of Post Glacial rebound and the Ice Age continuum. We have to debunk Isostasy before we can move forward into a new era of discoveries which I will not reveal here for the simple reason that if we cant get a grasp of what I am saying in the first case it is useless moving on to the exciting things that await. I go to great lengths to show how pure and simple the premiss is. Just look back in history and examine to ascendency of isostast and you will see that it evolved because of a Darwinian misinterpretation: the same misinterpretation that we follow today i.e that the sea floors are rising when it is the opposite that is true. Do you see what I am saying??? I was very happy to come across Earth Exchangers although they came across me by commenting on my video series "The Mysterious Receding Seas" on youtube. I was very happy to see that Jacks had some good subject matter and debates. I was impressed and even expressed that there seemed to be a membership of thinkers. That is all I want I want you all to start thinking on the issue I am expounding. Isostasy must go and it must be recognized that it has been mistaken for Earth Expansion. We have to take issue with what Darwin saw and how his misinterpretation mislead others after him to compile the Isostatic Rebound Theory.

  • Ok so the Sea Floor in your opinion is not rising. Got that!

    The Earth is expanding and that means that all of the Earth including the Sea Floors , and Continents.

    Now all Lakes lose w/time by filling up with sediment, do you agree with that?

    "Sea floors are not rising it is the sea that is getting shallower because the earth is expanding. After forty years of expressing this view and the simplicity of it we still dont get it. The Inuit people of Hudson Bay contacted me to come up and attend a meeting of their elders. The problem they are pointing out is that the elders have been saying for generations that the Hudson Bay is getting shallower and its affecting their hunting. The government agents however keep telling them that the sea level is rising. All the residents living in the Hudson Bay area that I have interviewed attest to the same shallowing of the Bay. What could be more simple. The Earth is Expanding and the seas recede and hence the illusion is created that the sea floor is rising. The same illusion fooled Darwin and that is how we ended up with Isostatic Rebound. We still keep getting it wrong after all these years with the facts staring us in the face."

  • Correction on link  https://xbraille.wix.com/receding-seas !

    Ok so you don't believe that the Oceans recede because of the accumulation of Ice at the poles, are that the Ice age would use up all of the water making the Oceans more Salty than normal, are that there is a pole shift every so often that rearranges the whole of the Planet. Land masses just drop or rise  do to shifts of the tectonic plates.

    How about that the whole Solar System has moved into a Higher Vibration of the Cosmos causing the Frequency of the Planet to rise and adjust to accommodate, so the mass of the molecules needing to adjust so as to be lighter needing to expand more space between them!

This reply was deleted.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives