First, it was the Pacific Northwest. Now it's happening on the East Coast? Death Spikes 48%. http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/06/17/fox-japan-nuclear-radiation-killing-babies-philadelphia-deaths-rate-spikes-48-percent-radiation-detected-drinking-water-28441/
PEOPLE WAKE UP!!!!! I wouldn't be able to believe anyone could believe we are not being irradiated to death, except for the existence of the dumbing down of education and the wholesale sell-out of the "Free" Press.
Want to kill a population slowly? Kill their babies. Why do you think our gov't freely shells out taxpayer dollars for wholesale abortion? Not only does it decrease the American population, but it allows Americans participatory privileges in funding our own decimation! Why do you think the gov't does nothing about the illegal alien population? Because illegal aliens are a source of revenue and represent a way of recreating the decimated tax base with a more compliant, uneducated population that will vote for their "liberators," thus that population is also funding its own enslavement and even though it is a practical solution that could assist the gov't in meeting its financial obligations, the problem is most politicians can't change their behavior and will, business as usual, line their pockets instead. Recent news headlines indicate gov't funding of abortion may be dispensed with. Why now? Because the gov't is broke (visible purpose) or because it has been replaced with a free alternative, namely, radiation (underlying purpose, covered by the visible purpose), which is more effective because it kills the young, and the old, and the disabled, and eventually, the healthier adult (slave) population, after they have rendered their service to their gods. THINK PEOPLE!!!! How is it Chernobyl got its concrete tomb so fast and Japan can't possibly do it this year?
Read this very important next article. Chernobyl proved infants are more affected by radiation. Recent news indicates that Fukushima began meltdown within hours of the tsunami, thus since March 11, 2011, radiation has been spewing. The animated charts tracking the radioactive plumes from Japan have clearly reached and spread across the US. Those doing measurements and not scared to publicize the results are showing radioactive particles are on the ground and in the air here, in the soil, air, and drinking water. Qualified professionals are now questioning the spike in infant mortalities during the times since the plumes arrived in the cities on the front lines of those radioactive plumes (meaning they received more radiation than those further away). Note that the Chernobyl doctor got jail time for being a competent, caring doctor who knew what the radiation was doing to the children. Expect the same from our gov't. After Obama said don't worry, be happy, the MSM dropped the worst nuclear accident in the history of this planet like the literal hot potato it was. Remember, our government's policy is to not create a panic. That means hide the truth. CDC statistics, as well as any others the gov't can control or bully, will be downplayed to keep Americans asleep. Otherwise, we will all take to the streets and wave our arms wildly, spin around and bounce off cars and trees and other people, shoot our forbidden guns at invisible radioactive particles (because they think that we are that stupid!) and not show up to work, and make the Dow Jones Industrial Average crash and burn so a handful of people (elites) won't be quite so filthy rich as they want to be and not so controllable either.
Here's the Pacific Northwest article:
As I've previously noted, infants are much more vulnerable to radiation than adults. And see this.However, radiation safety standards are set based on the assumption that everyone exposed is a healthy man in his 20s.
Now, a physician (Janette D. Sherman, M. D.) and epidemiologist (Joseph Mangano) have penned a short but horrifying essay asking whether a spike in infant deaths in the Northwest are due to Fukushima:
The recent CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report indicates that eight cities in the northwest U.S. (Boise ID, Seattle WA, Portland OR, plus the northern California cities of Santa Cruz, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Jose, and Berkeley) reported the following data on deaths among those younger than one year of age:
4 weeks ending March 19, 2011 - 37 deaths (avg. 9.25 per week)
10 weeks ending May 28, 2011 - 125 deaths (avg.12.50 per week)This amounts to an increase of 35% (the total for the entire U.S. rose about 2.3%), and is statistically significant. Of further significance is that those dates include the four weeks before and the ten weeks after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant disaster. In 2001 the infant mortality was 6.834 per 1000 live births, increasing to 6.845 in 2007. All years from 2002 to 2007 were higher than the 2001 rate.
***
Data from Chernobyl, which exploded 25 years ago, clearly shows increased numbers of sick and weak newborns and increased numbers of deaths in the unborn and newborns, especially soon after the meltdown. These occurred in Europe as well as the former Soviet Union. Similar findings are also seen in wildlife living in areas with increased radioactive fallout levels.
(Chernobyl – Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, Alexeiy V. Yablokov, Vasily B. Nesterenko, and Alexey V. Nesterenko. Consulting Editor: Janette D. Sherman-Nevinger. New York Academy of Sciences, 2009.)
Levels of radioisotopes were measured in children who had died in the Minsk area that had received Chernobyl fallout. The cardiac findings were the same as those seen in test animals that had been administered Cs-137. Bandashevsky, Y. I, Pathology of Incorporated Ionizing Radiation, Belarus Technical University, Minsk. 136 pp., 1999. For his pioneering work, Prof. Bandashevsky was arrested in 2001 and imprisoned for five years of an eight year sentence.
***
Why should we care if there may be is a link between Fukushima and the death of children? Because we need to measure the actual levels of isotopes in the environment and in the bodies of people exposed to determine if the fallout is killing our most vulnerable. The research is not technically difficult – the political and economic barriers may be greater. Bandshevsky and others did it and confirmed the connection. The information is available in the Chernobyl book. (Previously cited.)
The biological findings of Chernobyl cannot be ignored: isotope incorporation will determine the future of all life on earth – animal, fish, bird, plant and human. It is crucial to know this information if we are to avoid further catastrophic damage.
Comments
No. They're using US dollars for 2007 as a baseline for construction cost comparisons.
Cooper - 1974
Ft. Calhoun - 1966
The Hallam Nuclear Generating Station in Nebraska was the site of an experimental graphite-moderated sodium cooled reactor. It was located near Hallam, about 25 miles southwest of Lincoln. The graphite moderator was clad in stainless steel. There were issues with the cladding, corrosion and stress cracking led to the failure of the cladding cans. Correcting the failure would have been expensive so the plant was decommissioned and the nuclear components sealed in concrete.
Construction started in 1958. The plant operated from 1962 to 1964. Decommissioning was completed in 1969.[1]
Currently the site holds a fossil-fuel plant, Sheldon Station.
Operator: Nebraska Public Power District
Location and Service Territory: The Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) occupies a 1,251-acre site near Brownsville, Nebraska.
Construction Cost: $1.152 billion (2007 USD)
Reactor Description: The Cooper unit is a General Electric Type 4 boiling water reactor.
Cooling System: The Cooper facility is cooled with a once-through cooling system fed by the Missouri River.
Operator: Omaha Public Power District
Location and Service Territory: Fort Calhoun Station is located on 660 acres near Omaha, Nebraska. The utility has an easement for another 580 acres, the acreage being maintained in a natural state.
Construction Cost: $754.65 million (2007 USD)
Reactor Description: Fort Calhoun is a Combustion Engineering two-loop pressurized water reactor.
Cooling System: Fort Calhoun relies on a once-through cooling system in which the water is not re-circulated after being drawn from the nearby Missouri River.Great info, DR! I hope this demonstrates to our readers that there is much information available that is in opposition to what our gov't is trying to lead us to believe. Radiation, at any level, kills! We have already had too much exposure. Detox regimens should have been started immediately, but it took time to get the know-how broadcast. However, it's not too late and should be done now and continued until Fukushima (or any other out-of-control nuclear plant) is contained, soil and water where food comes from has been tested and shown to be safe, etc.
Agreed, Byron. It could have been leaked to create fear, but then it exposes the gov't for the liar it is. But, if it's only babies being injured and killed, especially if it's not your baby, then probably the entire country won't panic.
Monday, April 11, 2011
French Nuclear Group Warns that Children and Pregnant Mothers Shoul...
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/04/french-nuclear-group-...
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
FDA Refuses to Test Fish for Radioactivity ... Government Pretends ...
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/04/fda-refuses-to-test-f...
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Storms Knock Out 3 Nuclear Reactors in Alabama ... No Leak, But a R...
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/04/storms-knock-out-3-nu...
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Radiation Expert: "Sr-90 and Uranium and Particulates Will Be Build...
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/04/radiation-expert-sr-9...
Thursday, April 14, 2011
U.S. Providing Inadequate Radiation Readings to the Public
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/04/us-providing-inadequa...
There are so many more.......We each must choose what we are willing to believe and then we must live with the ramifications.
Just my two cents.............
Friday, April 15, 2011
Killing the Unborn ... With Radiation
Brian Moench, MD, noted last month:
Administration spokespeople continuously claim "no threat" from the radiation reaching the US from Japan, just as they did with oil hemorrhaging into the Gulf. Perhaps we should all whistle "Don't worry, be happy" in unison. A thorough review of the science, however, begs a second opinion.
That the radiation is being released 5,000 miles away isn't as comforting as it seems.... Every day, the jet stream carries pollution from Asian smoke stacks and dust from the Gobi Desert to our West Coast, contributing 10 to 60 percent of the total pollution breathed by Californians, depending on the time of year. Mercury is probably the second most toxic substance known after plutonium. Half the mercury in the atmosphere over the entire US originates in China. It, too, is 5,000 miles away. A week after a nuclear weapons test in China, iodine 131 could be detected in the thyroid glands of deer in Colorado, although it could not be detected in the air or in nearby vegetation.The idea that a threshold exists or there is a safe level of radiation for human exposure began unraveling in the 1950s when research showed one pelvic x-ray in a pregnant woman could double the rate of childhood leukemia in an exposed baby. Furthermore, the risk was ten times higher if it occurred in the first three months of pregnancy than near the end. This became the stepping-stone to the understanding that the timing of exposure was even more critical than the dose. The earlier in embryonic development it occurred, the greater the risk.
A new medical concept has emerged, increasingly supported by the latest research, called "fetal origins of disease," that centers on the evidence that a multitude of chronic diseases, including cancer, often have their origins in the first few weeks after conception by environmental insults disturbing normal embryonic development. It is now established medical advice that pregnant women should avoid any exposure to x-rays, medicines or chemicals when not absolutely necessary, no matter how small the dose, especially in the first three months.
Read the full article here :
Thanks, Stephen.
Kim, depopulation is the goal of all this anti-natural remedy movement.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next