MARCH
2009 2010 2011
5.0+ 132 89 89
6.0+ 4 24 17
7.0+ 1 1 0
8.0+ 0 0 0
9.0+ 0 0 1
tHESE NUMBERS CAME FROM THE EMSC-CSEM WEB SITE. USGS WILL NOT GIVE ME PAST TOTALS AND THEY HAVE LIED TO MANY TIMES TO BE TRUSTED.
MARCH
2009 2010 2011
5.0+ 132 89 89
6.0+ 4 24 17
7.0+ 1 1 0
8.0+ 0 0 0
9.0+ 0 0 1
tHESE NUMBERS CAME FROM THE EMSC-CSEM WEB SITE. USGS WILL NOT GIVE ME PAST TOTALS AND THEY HAVE LIED TO MANY TIMES TO BE TRUSTED.
You need to be a member of Earthchangers College to add comments!
Comments
Your numbers are way low.
March 1 to March 31 2011
5 - 5.9 - 529
6 - 6.9 - 68
7 - 7.9 - 3
8 - 8.9 - 0
9 - 9.9 - 1
March 2010
5 - 5.9 - 235
6 - 6.9 - 23
7 - 7.9 - 3
8 - 8.9 - 0
9 - 9.9 - 0
March 2009
5 - 5.9 - 162
6 - 6.9 - 5
7 - 7.9 - 1
8 - 8.9 - 0
9 - 9.9 - 0
Source: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/epic/epic_global.php
If you make that claim about the USGS/NEIC you have to make the same claim about EMSC-CSEM. EMSC uses the USGS as a data source.
http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=216372#providers