You need to be a member of Earthchangers College to add comments!

Join Earthchangers College

Comments

  • Jason  I think you have it correct, the question is who does the evaluation and how many people have to become ill for it to take place. Monsanto has a massive battery of lawyers and can tie up anything in court for ever. We know they have to be paying off Judges when you look at their absurd ruling's. In this administration the rule of law has been quite deficient. The new laws seem to come to a deadlock or a dead end. The FDA has become a useless organization period and the EPA is right behind them.  

  • So last year on March 16, 2012, this group was able to shut down 1 of 10 Monsanto installations in California. Then about a year later, BO signs the HR 933 (Consolidated and Further Appropriations Act of 2013) into law on March 26, 2013. Section 735  of CFAA is threaded into the Plant Protection Act of 2000 and the USDA - APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service). APHIS must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and determines whether to grant a GMO plant non- regulated status.

    Section 735 states the following : Directs the Secretary, if a determination of non-regulated status under the Plant Protection Act has been invalidated, to authorize movement, introduction, continued cultivation, or commercialization for the interim period necessary for the Secretary to complete any required analyses or consultations related to the petition for non-regulated status.

    If I'm understanding this correctly, it means that if plant has been discovered to be dangerous and require regulation, it can be pushed on the population anyway, or until a secondary analysis can take place.

  • Good now remove the building to the dump.

This reply was deleted.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives