Controversy served: do you intend to actually United States finally introduce the controversial Mandatory Microchip for access to the future health system?
The previous article analyzing the H.R. 3200 (Healthcare Bill H. R) http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/111/AAHCA09001xml.pdfhas had immediate reactions of several law firms that are interested in using the magazine as a platform for legal debate on the validity or not of the "draft Law". The letters received all make reference to the existence of the H. R HR4872 (Reconciliation Act). Reconciliation Act:http://housedocs.house.gov/rules/hr4872/111_hr4872_reported.pdf
In response to the latter text, as you can see we really talking about a universal system of social security through a health card similar to the one we have in our National Health System or our European dnie, without another type of legal implications.
Given that this debate has important ethical implications and profound legal, we invite all those legal experts of the globe to express their opinion.
The question is to elucidate and arbitrate a basic question in right. What is the true legal scope of health reform in the USA?
We reproduce here the controversy aroused in the previous article:
Specifically is discarded the validity of the bill HR3200 because we assure you that this item is not at all clear.
If the text actually in force is the Reconciliation Act:http://housedocs.house.gov/rules/hr4872/111_hr4872_reported.pdf
Think that Ron Paul is playing its integrity and its prestige in the USA and it may also play in this publication; it is necessary to clarify this matter, since, in effect there is conflict between the HR4872 and HR3200.
This article should serve to clarify once and for all this matter and run. If we look at what sets the HR4872, the matter was settled with a mere health card that carries a chip. (Something logical for the managerial control of any Universal Health Care System).
If we look at what sets the HR3200, the theme is quite another thing. The fact that there is the Applied Digital, and in particular the development of VeryChip, of the hand of Mr. Tommy Thompson, makes this issue is settled definitively?.
That is the question. To what extent is law HR3200, or the HR4872.?
We are aware that this is one of the most transcendental debates of our history.
If outside the HR4872, we would be talking about this.
But… .If outside the HR3200
We would be talking about this other.
Let us bear in mind that America will always be a precedent for the rest of the Governments, but on this occasion, Europe is far more advanced in experience in systems of universal health care. The coverage in Europe is universal and can be resolved with systems based on Health Management with a chip embedded in the cards and a database with the medical history of the patient in the Health System. It is quite sufficient. In this line is the HR4872.
But we have read in detail the HR3200, and has nothing to do with the spirit of the Universal Systems of Health, but it goes far beyond that. The question is…How about HR4872 or HR3200?
What is really the true scope of the reform? It is well worth the time we stop to discuss and clarify/dispel doubts.
The debate is open…
StarViewerTeam International 2012.
Comments
Kim, well said! :-)
Eeeeeek!!
Are you kidding me? They relied on NZT? It's worse than disappointing. You should send them your theory disproving the existence of a dark twin and see what they think.
LOL!
I can't wait to see the owner of this bill in an orange jump suit.