A very interesting hand book ... this MAJIC?
Detailing how to handle Aliens and Crashed ships and the sort.

The very foundation of whether or not Nibiru and or the Anunnaki are real rests upon whether or not Aliens and UFO's are real. Kick out any proof that Aliens exist, and the rest falls apart.

 

 

I have presented proof that President Eisenhower and Bishop McIntyre met with 3 Alien Races in 1954, and that Eisenhower met personally with an Anunnaki Delegation at Holloman AFB in 1955.

 

 

I have also shown proof that Pope Pius XII also personally met with the Anunnaki on Vatican Grounds in 1955

 

 

Here is more proof that our Government has known about, and planed to deal with the Alien issue, in these pages from the "MAJIC" Hand Book.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Earthchangers College to add comments!

Join Earthchangers College

Comments

  • Here is you're basic Google search on the subject

    https://www.google.com/#hl=en&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Pope%20John%20... 

    And here is another Google search for Pope John Paul II's 1980 chat

    https://www.google.com/#hl=en&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Pope%20John%20... 

     

    Cardinal Ratzinger has written in the Ratzinger Report (see below) that the 3rd secret of Fatima has to do with what he called "de nivissimis". The Cardinal had good reason to know, having previously read the still unrevealed secret. The Latin expression "de novissimis" means "dealing with the end times", pertaining to the latter days, or about the final events. These "end times" to which Ratzinger and the 3rd secret refer, and about which Pope Paul VI and his predecessors spoke, are well known to Biblical scholars.


    FILE TWO: Subject: Fatima and environs Date: Mon, 13 Dec 93 17:12:44 CST
    disclaimer.txt:

    This article is being posted for information purposes only, I do not claim it’s validity, and I leave it to the reader to decide upon the truthfulness of it themselves. I did NOT write this article, so please don’t flame me for something I didn’t write.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Note: The following file was originally picked up from the Catholic Information Network (CIN #1) in San Francisco (415-387-3251) PCP
    Although I’ve had this file for sometime, I have just recently deemed it appropriate to upload this to ParaNet in light of a number of references to Fatima and the "3rd" Secret" in certain UFO related material. In particular, I’ve seen this subject referenced in the "Krill" files and in msg threads both on ParaNet and in the Compuserve Paranormal Issues Forum. Some feel that it is related, at least in part, to some element of the UFO phenomenon.

    Personally, I feel it relates to some "end time" event which could lie over the not so distant horizon. Although much of the speculation surrounding the 3rd Secret of Fatima seems to indicate some kind of earthly catastrophe, its my own feeling that it also has an explicit political dimension to it, most probably in relation to the Soviet Union.

    The Ratzinger Report An Exclusive Interview on the State of the Church

    The session represented extremely unusual journalistic access to a prefect of the doctrinal office, requiring months of wizardry by Moody to negotiate. But Ratzinger had already lowered barriers with lengthy interviews that friendly writer Vittorio Messori turned into a book called "The Ratzinger Report." The cardinal's candid and downbeat comments on the health of the church had caused a sensation in 1985.

    Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger with Vittorio Messori

    (Ignatius Press 1985)

    profecias05_01.jpgFatima and environs One of the four sections of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (the so-called disciplinary section) is entrusted with the task of judging Marian apparitions.
    I ask:

    "Cardinal Ratzinger, have you read the so-called ’third secret of Fatima’, which Sister Lucia, the only survivor of the group of those who beheld the apparition, forwarded to Pope John XXIII, and which the Pope, after he had examined it, passed on to your predecessor, Cardinal Ottaviani, ordering him to deposit it in the archives of the Holy Office?"

    The reply is immediate and dry: "Yes, I have read it."
    Undenied versions are circulating in the world, I continue, which describe the contents of that "secret" as disquieting, apocalyptic, as warning of terrible sufferings. John Paul II himself, in his personal visit to Germany, seemed to confirm (albeit with prudent circumlocutions, privately, to a select group) the undeniably disconcerting contents of that text. Before him, Paul VI, during his pilgrimage to Fatima, also seems to have alluded to the "apocalyptic" themes of the "secret". Why was it never decided to make it public, if only to counter rash speculations?

    "If this decision has not yet been made", he answers, "it is not because the Popes want to hide something terrible."

    Then there is "something terrible" in Sister Lucia’s manuscript, I insist?

    "If that were so", he replies, avoiding going further, "that after all would only confirm the part of the message of Fatima already known. A stern warning has been launched from that place that is directed against the prevailing frivolity, a summons to the seriousness of life, of history, to the perils that threaten humanity. It is that which Jesus himself recalls very frequently: ’... Unless you repent you will all perish...’ (Lk 13:3). Conversion--and Fatima fully recalls it to mind--is a constant demand of Christian life. We should already know that from the whole of sacred Scripture."

    So there will be no publication, at least for now?

    "The Holy Father deems that it would add nothing to what a Christian must know from Revelation and also from the Marian apparitions approved by the Church in their known contents, which only reconfirmed the urgency of penance, conversion, forgiveness, fasting. To publish the ’third secret’ would mean exposing the Church to the danger of sensationalism, exploitation of the content."

    Perhaps also political implications, I venture, since it seems that here, also, as in the two other "secrets", Russia is mentioned?
    At this point, however, the Cardinal declares that he is not in a position to go further into the matter and firmly refuses to discuss other particulars. On the other hand, at the time of our interview, the Pope proceeded to reconsecrate the world (with a particular mention of Eastern Europe) to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, precisely in accordance with the exhortation of the Virgin of Fatima, and the same John Paul II, wounded by his would-be assassin, on May 13-- anniversary of the first apparition in the Portuguese locality--went to Fatima in order to thank Mary, "whose hand (he said) had miraculously guided the bullet", and seemed to refer to the forewarnings that had been transmitted through a group of children to humanity and that seemed to refer also to the person of the Pontiff.
    On the same theme, it is well known that for years, now, a village in Yugoslavia, Medjugorje, is at the center of world attention because of reported "apparitions" which --whether true or not-- have already drawn millions of pilgrims. But they have also provoked deplorable conflicts between the Franciscans who govern the parish and the bishop of the local diocese. Is a clarifying statement of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the highest court in this matter, to be expected, with, of course, the approval of the Pope, which is indispensable for each one of its documents?
    He replies:

    "In this area, more than ever, patience is the fundamental principle of the policy of our Congregation. No apparition is indispensable to the faith; Revelation terminated with Jesus Christ. He himself is the Revelation. But we certainly cannot prevent God from speaking to our time through simple persons and also through extraordinary signs that point to the insufficiency of the cultures stamped by rationalism and positivism that dominate us. The apparitions that the Church has officially approved--especially Lourdes and Fatima- -have their precise place in the development of the life of the Church in the last century. They show, among other things, that Revelation-- still unique, concluded and therefore unsurpassable--is not yet a dead thing but something alive and vital. Moreover--prescinding Medjugorje, on which I cannot express a judgment since the case is still being examined by the Congregation--one of the signs of our times is that the announcements of ’Marian apparitions’ are multiplying all over the world. For example, reports are arriving from Africa and from other continents at the section of the Congregation that is competent to deal with such reports."

    But, I ask, besides the traditional element of patience and prudence, on what criteria does the Congregation base itself for a judgment, in the face of the multiplication of these facts?

    "One of our criteria", he says, "is to separate the aspect of the true or presumed ’supernaturality’ of the apparition from that of its spiritual fruits. The pilgrimages of ancient Christianity were often concentrated on places with respect to which our modern critical spirit would be horrified as to the ’scientific truth’ of the tradition bound up with them. This does not detract from the fact that those pilgrimages were fruitful, beneficial, rich in blessings and important for the life of the Christian people. The problem is not so much that of modern hypercriticism (which ends up later, moreover, in a form of new credulity), but it is that of the evaluation of the vitality and of the orthodoxy of the religious life that is developing around these places."

  • The governments around the world are real good at hiding things from the sheeple for a very long time.

  • The very same Etherians just may be the "Glowing" being that Enlil saw in his dream-vision just before Nibiru caused the great flood!

  • The Twining Memo


    (This is a transcription from the original  memo.  As much as possible, the original format has been preserved.)

    SUBJECT: AMC Opinion Concerning      "Flying Discs"

    TO: Commanding General

    This letter was sent out from Air Material Commands (AMC) in response to a request from Brig General Schulgen.  As a result of the opinions expressed by Twining, Gen Schulgen issued his now famous Collection Memorandum
    Gen. Twining requested that investigations be conducted that might shed some light on the recent rash of Flying Saucer sightings. In response to the Schugen Collection Memorandum, The Walker Memo was sent to see what field offices could find.
    Some proponents view this letter as proof that the Air Force knows that extraterrestrial UFOs exist.  The closest the the letter comes to considering alien origin is the opinion that [there is] "The possibility that some foreign nation has a form of propulsion possibly nuclear, which is outside of our domestic knowledge." However, the proponents tend to ignore, or dismiss as an "obvious lie" dictated by the Super Secret Roswell Conspiracy, the instruction that his commanders should consider: "The lack of physical evidence in the shape of crash recovered exhibits which would undeniably prove the existence of these subjects."

    Army Air Force

    Washington 25, D.C.

    ATTENTION: Brig. General George Schulgen

    AC/AS-2

    1. As requested by AC/AS-2 there is presented below the considered opinion of this command concerning the so-called "Flying Discs." This opinion is based on interrogation report data furnished by AC/AS-2 and preliminary studies by personnel of T-2 and Aircraft Laboratory, Engineering Division T-3. This opinion was arrived at in a      conference between personnel from the Air Institute of Technology, Intelligence T-2,      Office, Chief of Engineering Division, and the Aircraft, Power Plant and Propeller      Laboratories of Engineering Division T-3.

    2. It is the opinion that:

    a. The phenomenon is something real and not visionary or fictitious.         b. There are objects probably approximating the shape of a disc, of such appreciable size        as to appear to be as large as man-made aircraft.         c. There is a possibility that some of the incidents may be caused by natural phenomena,        such as meteors.         d. The reported operating characteristics such as extreme rates of climb, maneuverability        (particularly in roll), and motion which must be considered evasive when sighted or        contacted by friendly aircraft and radar, lend belief to the possibility that some of the        objects are controlled either manually, automatically or remotely.         e. The apparent common description is as follows:-

    (1) Metallic or light reflecting surface.           (2) Absence of trail, except in a few instances where the object apparently was operating          under high performance conditions.           (3) Circular or elliptical in shape, flat on bottom and domed on top.           (4) Several reports of well kept formation flights varying from three to nine objects.           (5) Normally no associated sound, except in three instances a substantial rumbling roar          was noted.           (6) Level flight speeds normally above 300 knots are estimated.

    f. It is possible within the present U.S. knowledge -- provided extensive detailed        development is undertaken -- to construct a piloted aircraft which has the general        description of the object in sub- paragraph (e) above which would be capable of an        approximate range of 7000 miles at subsonic speeds.

    g. Any development in this country along the lines indicated would be extremely        expensive, time consuming and at the considerable expense of current projects and        therefore, if directed, should be set up independently of existing projects.

    h. Due consideration must be given the following:-

    (1) The possibility that these objects are of domestic origin - the product of some          high security project not known to AC/AS-2 or this Command.

    (2) The lack of physical evidence in the shape of crash recovered exhibits which would          undeniably prove the existence of these subjects.

    (3) The possibility that some foreign nation has a form of propulsion possibly nuclear,          which is outside of our domestic knowledge.

    3. It is recommended that:-

    a. Headquarters, Army Air Forces issue a directive assigning a priority,        security classification and Code name for a detailed study of this matter to include the        preparation of complete sets of all available and pertinent data which will then be made        available to the Army, Navy, Atomic Energy Commission, JRDB, the Air Force Scientific        Advisory Group, NACA, and the RAND and NEPA projects for comments and recommendations,        with a preliminary report to be forwarded within 15 days of receipt of the data and a        detailed report thereafter every 30 days as the investigation develops. A complete        interchange of data should be affected.

    4. Awaiting a specific directive AMC will continue the investigation      within its current resources in order to more closely define the nature of the phenomenon.      Detailed Essential Elements of Information will be formulated immediately for transmittal      thru channels.

  • Gerald Light mentions the"Etherians" in his letter ... here is a google link to more links about them

    http://www.google.com/#hl=en&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Pope%20Pius%20X... 

    Here is a link to Gen. Twining from the MAJIC paper   http://www.google.com/#hl=en&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Gen.%20Tw&c...  

     

    And here is a link to the book The Day After Roswell by USARMY Col (Ret) Col. Philip Corso ... http://www.google.com/#hl=en&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Col.%20Philip%2... 

     

    There is a free PDF on the internet of this book ... if anyone wants a copy, just DL it, or E-mail me and I will send a copy of the PDF.

     

    I have cross checked this info several time, and to several different sources ... its real

  • Here is a link to Google links for this subject ... http://www.google.com/#hl=en&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Pope%20Pius%20X... 

     

    2967655020?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024

    The above is a copy of a letter Mr. Gerald Light wrote to a friend ....

     

    2967655115?profile=original

This reply was deleted.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives