Alien Creature "Swims" Past ISS

[Peter S]

Believe it or not - I'll let you decide.

[Rosemary S]

That is odd. It looks like an aquarium has been put in front of the space station and then filmed. The arm are so short in relation to the body. The tail part does not seem to move at all.

[Cheryl Nelson]

The only reason it isn't already common knowledge is that most people don't watch NASA imaging like we (and other groups) do, because all kinds of UFOs are up there buzzing around the sun.

[Peter S]

Interesting. This could be the year it becomes common knowledge, or should I say common belief.

[Cheryl Nelson]

There is definitely a UFO up there on EIT304 for that date but there are only four images, and the closest one is too tiny for me to see.  The movie won't enlarge enough.

[Cheryl Nelson]

No, Peter, unfortunately it is a still shot.  I ought to see if I can get a movie of that day to play and see what it does.  But the "arms" certainly have that swimming/motion look to them.

I'm with you on the moth thing.  And, of course, I have to tell this great 4th grade joke.  A teacher was grading papers.  He got to one and the student's answer was a hoot.  The question was:  What is a myth? And the student's answer was: a female moth.  :-D

[Peter S]

Yep, a Sunday morning blunder there!

Not sure about the image - although it does look real as it passes behind various parts of the ISS - but hard to tell with all of the photo-shop options available these days!

Did the object you're referring to Cheryl flap its arms? If so, could be. Who would know how many species there are in space and for me (back on Mother Earth) - I can't tell one moth from another (generally speaking) - they all look the same to me!

[Cheryl Nelson]

Peter, drink your coffee before posting!  ;-)

Anyway, could the object that looks like it's swimming be related to this? ...

[Peter S]

Whoops - thanks Cheryl. Eyes half closed this morning!

[Kim B]

Looks like a Cicada.

[Cheryl Nelson]

Interesting image.  I have no clue if real or not.