Neumayer Station Antarctica Personnel Witness Brown Dwarf & Nibiru

[Cheryl Nelson]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjClzik1rO8&feature=channel_video_title

Looks like what was thought to be the moon, but what is the pulsating light?  If it is really a BD that close, wouldn't it be shredding Earth by now? 

[msred]

Well, Mr. Gordon James Gianninoto, I think you have created my most favorite post of this ning (thus far; I'm sure there'll be many more).... this part in particular, quote: "But really we only know this much, almost nothing more than the dark ages, so why not ask a few questions? [Anyone] may stumble onto some of the greatest secrets of the universe by not knowing where [the] inquiries lead." I so agree!!!!! and contend that upon this principle this ning will thrive, unlike other(s). Thank you so much for the response... it has taken my mind off and into another world.

How could gravity NOT be magnetism (or at least relative to/of), the constant push/pull being what binds our solar system? ... almost like it has an intelligence of it's own, mistepping every so often because one party gets a bit too ambitious, or simply misses its mark in time and space. Our Creator has to be the most playful physicists EVER!!!

[donna]

Don't add energy to what you read just be obsevers! Jacks

[Gordon James Gianninoto]

Hi msred, yes it does. It seems like all the planets and the sun all have their north poles facing up, so perhaps it is like some giant eddy pool and or perhaps gravity is polar like magnetism or maybe gravity IS magnetism, so the particle flows contain the solar system like a unit. Otherwise in 4 billion years wouldn't all the planets have fallen into or been sucked into the sun? That is why there are so few actual collisions in solar systems. I find that really interesting personally. But it just shows you how little either scientists know, or how little scientists who do know, actually reveal. And msred, no question is dumb. People who really know more than us, may wish that we think questions are dumb so we don't get into their business. But really we only know thismuch, almost nothing more than the dark ages, so why not ask a few questions? You may stumble onto some of the greatest secrets of the universe by not knowing where your inquiries lead. I say all the greatest inventions were by people too dumb to know that they couldn't do that! They almost closed the patent office in 1875 because 'everything had been invented that could possibly be invented' . I was thinking, if the universe is expanding, gravity must push. No one encouraged me, most discouraged me. Now it has still not be announced to the public, but I know astrophysicists who agree. I will bet the people at area 51 have known that for 60 years. We have to share these ideas because I think the elite think we are expendable and the last thing they want is for us to figure out anything. So keep asking those questions!

[msred]

So, (dumb question) is the Sun pushing Earth (and all other planets) away, and depending on their size/mass and composition, positioning them with this push into their current positions/rotations/orbits... (considering, also, each planet is pushing off neighboring planets, as well as considering each planet's rotation & orbit helping in stabilizing forces)?

 

[Gordon James Gianninoto]

Hi Cheryl. No I am saying gravity PUSHES. Look at it logically, there is the electromagnetic spectrum: heat goes out does not come back. Sound goes out does not come back. electricity goes out does not come back, radio waves go out do not come back, light goes out does not come back. Magnetism goes out but does come back and gravity sucks? Not logical. You could say that the sending out of the magnetism makes a vacuum and pulls it back to send it out again. Anyway, the foremost gravity researcher in the world told me personally in 1988 that there IS NO PROOF THAT GRAVITY PULLS, OR PUSHES FOR THAT MATTER.  I told him that I was figuring out there is gravity and more gravity but no such thing as antigravity, He told me that IF I could come up with one single experiment that proves whether gravity pulls or pushes I would be the most famous scientist in the last 400 years. This is why I say PX is a planet not a star, because stars coming thru solar systems is not a problem, and planets hitting planets is almost if not entirely non existent too. But speed will overcome gravity so some things do hit but not many as gravity works over incredible distances. Even intersecting galaxies have virtually no collisions. So it is not hard to believe that like two magnets coming together north pole to north pole, they do not hit, they stand their distance until one can get by on one side or the other. So is gravity polar? Perhaps. There is some evidence to suggest particle flows create dead areas and eddies and can capture another body and hold it. It is clear that even if gravity pushes that not one equation has to be changed, for example to send a rocket to mars from earth, for example. Another example is that there would still be a point in between the earth and moon where the gravity of each is balanced. Another point not often discussed, if ever, is that rotation cancels gravity. That is why bullets leaving at the same speed, weight and velocity and force travel farther if the barrel is rifled imparting a twist. This is why the earlier solid fuel rockets rotated and were all off course, while later rockets use liquid fuel and adjustable nozzles and do not rotate at all. BTW I have top astrophysicists quoting me at symposiums without credit to the guy who talks to ETs!  Moi. I am used to this. But I know I figured out what is happening without a budget, a professorship, or tenure or publishing.. How could 400 years go by before one person questioned Newton's law of gravity pulling? What does that tell you about me.I knew as a kid I was born hundreds of years too early, I guess to shake things up a bit. It has been fun so far, I must say! My best to you.

[msred]

Oh man, I feel so sorry for the guy who made this video... he's reading wayyyyy too much into it (my opinion).

I agree - the item appears to be lens conflict (what a friend from Argentina suggested it was)... and where is the guy who is supposedly in a business? suit?

They look like they're wearing suits made from something like the lightweight Mylar material emergency blankets are made from, the ones that retain body heat, and withstand wind & water...don't know about the headgear - that seems overkill, except they would certainly need face/eye protection with the snow and sun.

Watched today's activity and the shadow going across reappeared (seems the light source is behind the camera... the shadow on the main building is moving similarly as from the camera building. There is what appears to be an overhead service door, which when opened, lets out a great deal of light when it's dark outside. Quite a few land rovers about and making tracks in the snow today, too. Business as usual? I'm thinking so.

I'm also wondering if these workers got wind of everyone's questionable videos and comments, and they decided to give us a GOOD SHOW = pulling a joke on us.

[Cheryl Nelson]

Just make sure they don't pay in USD, lol.  And, yeah, editors, I hear you.

So, when you say you figured out that gravity pushes not pulls, you are talking about Newton's 3rd law, for every action there is a reaction; for every force there is an opposite force? 

As for planets being stopped, where is the proof for that?

As for gravity sucking, I guess it does since comets move progressively faster as they approach the sun.  Isn't it the sun's gravity (being a much larger body) pulling them in?

Thanks for the link about Pangaea.

 

[Gordon James Gianninoto]

Hi Cheryl, Asian Geo contacted me out of the blue. I did two versions of the article one included everything including UFOs, and then the Bd of Directors met and decided that they 'could not afford too much truth' so I wrote a more watered down version. They said they would combine the two as they saw fit, and I said, please leave enough of me in there so when I read it I recognize it as something I wrote.I told them I did not expect much as they were not paying me, but they said 'oh no, we are paying you' but I have no idea how much. I figure the prestige is worth anything anyway. The only time Nat Geo ever mentioned UFOs was an article on growing up in Idaho about 20 years ago showing some small boys and a stream and quoting one of the boys that 'on hot nights they like to lay in the stream and watch the skies for UFOs. Back to the subject, if you remember, I said I figured out that gravity pushes not pulls, and two, there is no proof it pushes or pulls. But, remember the 'expanding universe'? Well Hello! 'Expanding?' Doesn't that say it all right there? If gravity sucked, wouldn't everything collide? So, you see it might be possible that PX came in one way the earth, venus and the DT the other and now they are all stopped. But you are very right, they will never tell us, we will all see who and what was right when it happens with our own eyes. If you want to know about Pangea and predecessors:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea

"The breaking up and formation of supercontinents appear to be cyclical through Earth's 4.6 billion year history. There may have been several others before Pangaea. The next-to-last one, Pannotia, formed about 600 million years ago (Ma) during the Proterozoic eon, and lasted until 540 Ma. Before Pannotia, there was Rodinia, which lasted from about 1.1 billion years ago (Ga) until about 750 million years ago.

Rodinia formed by the accretion and assembly of fragments produced by breakup of an older supercontinent, called Columbia or Nuna that was assembled in the period 2.0-1.8 Ga.[4][5] The exact configuration and geodynamic history of Rodinia are not nearly as well understood as Pannotia and Pangaea. When Rodinia broke up, it split into three pieces: the supercontinent of Proto-Laurasia and the supercontinent of Proto-Gondwana, and the smaller Congo craton. Proto-Laurasia and Proto-Gondwanaland were separated by the Proto-Tethys Ocean. Soon thereafter Proto-Laurasia itself split apart to form the continents of Laurentia, Siberia and Baltica. The rifting also spawned two new oceans, the Iapetus Ocean and Paleoasian Ocean. Baltica was situated east of Laurentia, and Siberia northeast of Laurentia.

Around 600 Ma, most of these masses came back together to form the relatively short-lived supercontinent of Pannotia, which included large amounts of land near the poles and only a relatively small strip near the equator connecting the polar masses.

Only 60 million years after its formation, about 540 Ma, near the beginning of the Cambrian epoch, Pannotia in turn broke up, giving rise to the continents of Laurentia, Baltica, and the southern supercontinent of Gondwana.

In the Cambrian period, the independent continent of Laurentia, which would become North America, sat on the equator, with three bordering oceans: the Panthalassic Ocean to the north and west, the Iapetus Ocean to the south and the Khanty Ocean to the east. In the Earliest Ordovician, around 480 Ma, the microcontinent of Avalonia – a landmass that would become the northeastern United States, Nova Scotia, and parts of current Great Britain, Iberia and the Maghreb – broke free from Gondwana and began its journey to Laurentia.[6]

Baltica, Laurentia, and Avalonia all came together by the end of the Ordovician to form a minor supercontinent cal

[Cheryl Nelson]

I find the theories interesting, however, a theory without proof is just a theory.   Not going religious here, but I've never understood how anyone could believe a "big bang" created the universe.  Wasn't CERN trying to emulate the Big Bang?  How would they know if they did? 

I'm curious, though.  How do scientists actually know if continents collide and drift?  Are there specific tests?  Tests that can actually go back several billion years accurately?  The amount of time is mind boggling.

Here's an interesting tidbit about Percival Lowell's theory on Pluto's perturbation.  It was later disproven when Voyager 2 sent back more information on Neptune's mass, which accounted for the perceived tug on Pluto.  Once that information was plugged in there was no perturbation.  It basically discredited the Planet X theory, but then there was that 1983 NY Times article.  Who knows what's true or not anymore.

I agree about NASA.  They are playing games, and the guys at the top, no matter who or where, always look after themselves first.

Good luck on getting published.  Did AsianGeo actually tap you or did you do a cold submission?  It's a heartbreak to think you will be published, only to get killed at the last minute.  I don't know if you are published or not, but if they tapped you, I hope you negotiated a kill fee.  I learned my lesson.  Will your article be just on Asian earthchanges or the entire world?

[stembi]

@ Gordon 

I love movies that show sunrises and sunsets because I am always thinking one of these days a hollywood moview is going to inadvertently show PX and not realize it until all the public has seen it.

This was already done in Deep Impact:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oZy2oetOGA

(look at frame 1:05:42)

yes, it's a fake PX, but it's still interesting ;)

and btw:

the date, that evacuation starts in the movie, is August 12th !

take care !