http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/10/14/three-statistics-which-spell-doom-for-america/
You need to be a member of Earthchangers College to add comments!
FOR NINETY YEARS, THE PRESIDENT WAS A HOSTAGE IN HIS OWN HOUSE
Posted by Wm on October 19, 2025 at 7:47am
Blog Topics by Tags
- earthquake (101)
- weather (95)
- of (80)
- japan (74)
- winter (70)
- severe (66)
- Obama (60)
- storm (56)
- radiation (54)
- to (52)
Monthly Archives
2025
- November (1)
- October (4)
- September (3)
- August (4)
- July (1)
- May (1)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (1)
2024
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (2)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- May (1)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (4)
2023
- December (4)
- November (5)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (4)
- June (10)
- May (13)
- April (16)
- March (8)
- February (3)
- January (13)
2022
- December (14)
- November (7)
- October (12)
- September (17)
- August (18)
- July (16)
- June (11)
- May (24)
- April (30)
- March (32)
- February (27)
- January (27)
2021
- December (20)
- November (15)
- October (25)
- September (36)
- August (37)
- July (38)
- June (27)
- May (48)
- April (37)
- March (30)
- February (26)
- January (34)
2020
- December (39)
- November (35)
- October (35)
- September (36)
- August (53)
- July (56)
- June (49)
- May (40)
- April (54)
- March (51)
- February (60)
- January (58)
2019
- December (33)
- November (40)
- October (36)
- September (40)
- August (33)
- July (49)
- June (45)
- May (63)
- April (52)
- March (50)
- February (71)
- January (84)
2018
- December (75)
- November (82)
- October (83)
- September (95)
- August (95)
- July (77)
- June (63)
- May (80)
- April (36)
- March (36)
- February (60)
- January (64)
2017
- December (49)
- November (64)
- October (52)
- September (61)
- August (43)
- July (53)
- June (38)
- May (53)
- April (43)
- March (55)
- February (32)
- January (64)
2016
- December (44)
- November (61)
- October (59)
- September (46)
- August (36)
- July (23)
- June (15)
- May (32)
- April (26)
- March (29)
- February (29)
- January (26)
2015
- December (29)
- November (23)
- October (25)
- September (16)
- August (14)
- July (32)
- June (31)
- May (30)
- April (32)
- March (34)
- February (64)
- January (52)
2014
- December (54)
- November (58)
- October (45)
- September (96)
- August (65)
- July (55)
- June (80)
- May (143)
- April (295)
- March (157)
- February (280)
- January (377)
2013
- December (355)
- November (332)
- October (474)
- September (443)
- August (410)
- July (367)
- June (214)
- May (195)
- April (245)
- March (205)
- February (132)
- January (117)
2012
- December (112)
- November (170)
- October (210)
- September (152)
- August (210)
- July (173)
- June (179)
- May (210)
- April (221)
- March (300)
- February (219)
- January (221)
2011
- December (208)
- November (218)
- October (152)
- September (199)
- August (229)
- July (213)
- June (233)
- May (197)
- April (161)
- March (321)
- February (171)
- January (202)
2010
- December (176)
- November (177)
- October (126)
- September (185)
- August (293)
- July (275)
- June (4)
Comments
You would think. But it does prove that if we want the cabal to be gone for good, we cannot leave any of them around with any power whatsoever.
I found this May 25, 2012 article interesting: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/05/as-an-encore-to-bailing-out-...
The government has allowed the amount of derivatives to reach 1.2 quadrillion dollars.
...
What is the government doing for an encore? Bailing out the derivatives clearinghouses.
As the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday:
Little noticed is that on Tuesday Team Obama took its first formal steps toward putting taxpayers behind Wall Street derivatives trading — not behind banks that might make mistakes in derivatives markets, but behind the trading itself. Yes, the same crew that rails against the dangers of derivatives is quietly positioning these financial instruments directly above the taxpayer safety net.
...
***
If there’s one truth we’ve learned about government financial backstops, it’s that sooner or later they will be used. So eventually taxpayers will have to bail out one derivatives clearinghouse or another. It promises to be quite a mess.
So, while "Team Obama" wasn't involved in the majority of the bailouts, it certainly isn't helping the US taxpayers by making them the safety net for derivative failures.
Most of the large banks that received bailouts have paid back their loans, with interest. However the government still owns stock shares in some of them. Now the Fed, which is private, has been buying toxic assets from banks (which means the Fed owns them).
Derivatives are a shadowy area. It is layers of complexity on top of underlying assets. Some are regulated, some are not. Some are okay (as in hedging), some are bets. It is speculated that derivatives far exceed the wealth of the entire world.
Bush Jr left office in 2008. The price of gasoline was in the high $2 range when Hurricane Katrina hit in 2005, when it then jumped up to low-mid $3. I don't particularly remember gas prices going down so I looked for gas prices in 2008. I found this: http://useconomy.about.com/od/suppl1/a/Gas-Prices-in-2008.htm, with a nice chart that shows gas prices juxtaposed with the bailouts:
2008 Gas Prices Timeline
Actually, it looks like gas prices were the post-Katrina prices and suddenly dived in Nov 2008 because investors pulled out of commodities, followed by OPEC reducing production during the last several months of the Bush Administration. This, of course, happening during the bailouts and the stock market dropping. So, it appears the decline in 2008 gas prices is multi-factorial.
I didn't find a similar chart for 2009, but this article at http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/11/02/us-usa-gasoline-price-idU... states that in November 2009 the average price of gas was $2.69 a gallon, up 29 cents from a year ago. So, in 2009, even though gas prices were rising from the bottoming out in Nov 2008, they were still less than they had been since Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
While the biggest bailouts happened on Bush's watch, it is interesting to note that "[Obama] could have insulated himself a little better from association with the distasteful bailout by not seeming to cater to the banks as much as he has: Among other things, he gave bank apologists like Larry Summers and Tim Geithner big jobs in his administration and has let the too-big-to-fail banks get even bigger." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/10/bank-bailout-opinion-harri...
And let's not forget that Obama bailed out the auto industry in 2009. It is interesting to note that Bush's bank bailouts made money, while Obama's bailout of the auto industry didn't:
Most of America’s media think President Obama's 2009 bailout of General Motors and Chrysler was a huge success.
Former Massachusetts Democratic Congressman Barney Frank threw cold water on this meme on NBC’s Meet the Press Sunday correctly informing viewers that the auto bailout lost money for the federal government. By contrast, we made money from George W. Bush's 2008 bank bailout.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/09/15/barney-frank-...
But, yes, the derivatives market is a very dangerous part of the casino culture and should be outlawed.