In another blog, @ https://earthchanges.ning.com/profiles/blogs/50-answers-of-an-alien-from, there is an interesting discussion about Nancy and the "Zetas." For the past few days, I had been considering posting the opinion of an ET about Zetatalk that was channeled for me in a "reading" that I received a month or so ago, but felt constrained. However, the Andromedan message that was posted here earlier was the "green light" to post mine, so here it is, and it is more specific.
I have no history of being into "channeled" anything, but I was curious. So, I've had two now. The first one was not believable as there was nothing specific, nothing that couldn't fit most people, so I discounted it. The second one was a real channel, I believe. I was careful not to give much information (but still get my questions answered). There were many things the channel mentioned that could not have been known because I didn't mention them. (BTW, this reading also relates to the fear "exercise" I talked about in Hypothetical #4, as it was mentioned that it was an area to work on.) I actually knew from experience about the squabbling, ego-tripping, and lack of integrity, but all I asked was what the ET thought about ZT.
For those who don't know, I nearly drowned when I was 7 when a wave knocked me down under the water. I was saved by a voice in my head telling me to get up, as it snapped me out of a daze. Last year, that voice returned when I was reading ZT and asked me if I wanted a "lift" (the ZT term for lifting service-to-other people off the planet when the worst of the earthchanges are occurring, to save them). See, https://earthchanges.ning.com/profiles/blogs/true-confessions-of-a for these and other details.
I shall not name the channel or the ET, to prevent unwarranted harassment like I have received for simply disagreeing with ZT. Here is a portion of that reading:
"...there is so much contradiction, ego-tripping, and, yes, petty squabbling "out there" in Zeta Land.... [referring to "channels" on Earth.]
"Yes, you heard the same voice as you did at 7, but this has nothing REALLY to do with Zetatalk. We do have members from the Zeta Reticuli area of space, they were among the first to explore Earth thousands of years ago. Our Zeta friends are wonderful beings. But this does not mean that the human receptors, or who claim to be the receptors of Zeta messages, who run Zetatalk, really have a connection to the Zetas. Actually, [the good ET's don't refer to their individual races, but to their combined group, which is made up of a variety of ET's and beings from other times/dimensions], we are a group who does not stress this race or that race, and we are the "good guys" involved in these changing times and UFO sightings, etc. There is not a separate "good guy" group, so to speak..
"That you heard your [ET "guardian angel's"] voice again after all these many years is a tribute to you and him, and regardless of how this event seemed to be involved with the Zetas, it was not involved with them in reality.
[This did not surprise me because six months or so ago, that knowledge suddenly was in my brain. (I don't usually hear voices in my head, what I get is a "silent knowing.") It was like hitting a brick wall. WTF?!?!? was my reaction. I had been confused over that thought since then, because it certainly seemed like I was involved with the Zs. And then, suddenly, out of the blue, the channel confirms it without me ever mentioning it. So, was my earlier recalls erroneous? No, because Zetas, as the channel/ET said, are part of the "good guy" group and they were in charge of my "fixes" as recounted in the True Confessions blog linked above. Anyway, back to the reading.....]
"We do not feel Zetatalk is legitimately on your star path. Listen most of all to the voice within, listen to your own heart and soul. If something does not ring true such as their predictions which fail to come true time and again, questionable science, disinformation--then there is something wrong. [I did not mention any of these things to them.] Often what is wrong is that there is an individual or individuals who are following their own need for ego-boost.
"For what it is worth...Zeta channels have acted poorly in some instances--a lack of integrity."
And what they said about Gerard was the conclusion I had already formed. (To protect his privacy, I won't disclose what was said.)
Wow! This channel was spot on.
Comments
I feel bad for The ZT folk, but for many it seems the path will be some form of disinformation and delusion. I've tried to wake up a few close friends over the last year, nobody will wake up. But those were CNN and FOX people, not ZT's.
There really isn't much of a difference when you think about it. People taking information from faceless third parties and believing it. Via satellite or low-level guides, or even the delusion of a NPD mind, it's all the same really.
I'm so thankful to be here, awake in this moment. :)
-Shaku
If he said that about Mr.-Nuke-The-West, maag baag Amrika (death to America), then I would have to agree. I beg to differ. It is not credible that a good soul could project that kind of immense negativity.
Another reason I don't read over there, I don't like to clutter my mind with nonsense like good bad guys and non-sinking land.
I think there is no more hope for Gerard Zwaan. He lives his life in a virtual box. A few days ago he wanted to declare that the president of Iran Mr. Ahmadinedschad is a kind of saint. This guy is an enemy of every kind of democrazy. Besides that he is surpressing every free opinion and his secret stuff even shot peaceful people to stop democrazy in the Iran. Some time ago Gerard Zwaan claimed that Hugo Chavez is a kind of saint too. This guy is another dictator with a very dark history.
Perhaps Zwaan likes such guys because they use the same ruthless means of surpressing and destroying democratic structures like Nancytalk does. There are no Zetas out there,- at least no one who ever talked with Nancy Lieder. Strict censorship and crazy rules are the most characteristic traits of Nancytalk.
So they keep on counting meaningless and temporary floods around the world to prove their sinking. But flooding doesn`t mean sinking in this case, because all this temporary floodings they count and collect were indeed only temporary. If there really something was sinking the land would stay permanently under water.
That is another big hoax of Nancy and Gerard.
Gerard. I don't know any Geralds.
I didn't say anything about Tunisia. I think Byron did.
Gerard has free will. He has made his choices.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next