China Mirages...What's the Truth?

We were examining this phenomenon at https://earthchanges.ning.com/profiles/blogs/mirage-buildings-and?xg_source=activity and I got into examining ZT regarding it. Here's the ZT link and my analysis of their 2006 article: http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta282.htm".  See the earthchanges blog referenced above, down in the comments, on the possible misinterpretation of the May 2011 misty city in China.

 

It would make more sense if the mirage showed people heading to the mountains. I certainly wouldn't have gotten the message to flee a coastal from seeing a mirage of a city.  Ah, one could say, you weren't one of the chosen who received the telepathic message which provided more information.

In the example of the movie, Close Encounters, ZT offered it cited that certain people got zapped with a telepathic message. Does that mean that not all of the tens of thousands of people in town for the holiday weekend who saw the image that was visible for four hours didn't get the subconscious message, thus, weren't included in the full explanation of the message?

An argument could be, Ah, we said it was similar to but not exactly like Close Encounters. (underlined phrase is an example of leaving oneself some wriggle room, which means to leave oneself some room to maneuvre  by clever or devious means: wriggle out of an embarrassing situation, esp. when the truth comes out.  Lots of those kinds of words in ZT.)

Just for the sake of argument, let's assume they all received the telepathic message. Then why is the image inconsistent with the advice? Where are the mountains? And, going further, what kind of advice is it to seek a city in the mountains? Cities might be a temporary refuge now but why not lead them away from coastlines and into something more sustainable through the passage so they don't have to leave again, especially when the message appeared to be time critical? Hasn't it been a basic premise that cities, in their own way, are just as dangerous as coastlines during the coming upheaval?

Read the actual article.  It says that mirages have been recorded in that location throughout history. Uh oh. A fly in the ointment. Why was this day any different?

Mist is involved in these events. See the link above for the May 2011 event and comments.  Did you know Disneyland, back in the 80's, projected mist into the air which turned the air into a canvas to show their movies in the sky over the tall ship area. It was great fun, but even back then the technology existed.

There are way too many details for these to just be mirages.  Hologram tech, or earlier Disneyland tech are the best possibilities.  But, perhaps, it is a reflection, though not likely since an original would have to exist to be reflected. (Later, after one of msred's comments I could see that perhaps a sunken city could exist that sometimes reflects into the air under certain conditions like clear water and sunlight at a precise angle.  But even as I type this I realize that mist is present and while the mist could act as a canvas to project onto, the presence of mist would mean sunlight could be blocked, but because of land configurations there could be exceptions.  Anyway, an underwater city is the least likely. 

But no matter the origin of the misty city, the ZT explanation doesn't make sense if one is trying to get people to do something. Just the telepathy would have been plenty enough, and much less confusing.

BTW, this earlier China mirage was in 2006. And five years later, what has happened? Tens of thousands of people witnessed the image and at least some, but logically more, received a telepathic message interpreting the mirage. Has there been a mass exodus? Has anything at all happened based on this grand warning?  Nope. Nada. Negativo. Zip. Zilch. Zero.

My bet is enterprising business developers are playing on a natural phenomenon and now have the power to make it more realistic, so as to increase tourist trade in their area. What do you think?

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Earthchangers College to add comments!

Join Earthchangers College

Comments

  • Mark,

    Forgive me if I say that I am a little tired of Nancy calling her predictions little white lies for the establishment.  Or an error in calculation or whatever other plausible excuse that may come up...she has made it abundently clear that the pole shift would happen in 2003(It didn't), then just prior to 2010(It didn't), then the 7 out of 10 event last year(it didn't)..... now just prior to 2011.....prediction dates that keep needing to be revised to fit the prediction are just dates being pulled out of a hat.....You do realize that if you pull enough dates you will eventually be correct.. I have absolutely nothing against Nancy nor her followers but when they decide to come onto this ning and start claiming that information is being stolen, I have huge issues.. Everything and I mean everything expressed on Nancy's site can be traced back to another source and I don't mean the extraterrestrial type either.  So please refrain from saving us from ourselves and focus on your own preparations. 

  • I see you haven't been able to counter my arguments, so you fire your final volley of pointlessness.  Typical.  I wish you well and hope you survive using the limited and dangerous information at Zetatalk.com and poleshift.ning.com. 

    I don't worry about my ning becoming irrelevant.  This ning is protected.  Yes, I am a contactee.  And people like you, even Nancy herself, hasn't been able to bring it down.  And her lame excuse I am with the "bad guys" is simply not true.  But how would you know?  You don't know me at all.  You only know "of" me and that is just unilateral defamation.  Oh well.

    I don't dispute the tectonic plates will move.  You haven't really read the blogs here, have you?  I think it will happen when the passage is nearer.  We aren't there yet, but the suspicious object following behind Elenin by several months could be it.  Amazing how Nancy hasn't grasped that piece of information, but I guess she has to distance herself from it because it's coming from the wrong direction.  And if Elenin (who certainly could be a member of the PX complex) and friend do turn out to be the real deal, I hope you finish your preps before then, just in case.

    Farewell.

  • don't worry Cheryl, I've said my piece and tire of this pointless banter.  When things really pick up and eventually the pole shift hits, I wonder what sort of things you and your members will be discussing then - perhaps a blog entitled 'How to bury your head in the sand'

    At the moment you can position yourself as the source of good poleshift advice as nothing really has started happening, but my advice to you is to prepare yourself for the day when you and your ning become less and less relevant until it's just you and others in denial left hoping that the PS won't be that bad right up until the last weeks.

    Surely you must see that IF the 7/10 events unfold as the Zetas have predicted that you will be very quickly be put aside as irrelevant compared to the real truth which won't be from you?

    Adios

     

  • Oh, Mark, you have so bought into Nancy's lie that Gerard runs the ning.  She is the de facto king of that ning.  Also, here is your first warning that to stay around here you must exercise some manners.  You cannot talk to people here like you do at Nancy's ning.
  • And msred: you obviously need too much hand holding for the other ning where you can only expect blunt, non sugar coated responses (which is why you've found the perfect home here no doubt)

    You seem to be under the impression that you and any other members of the public should be able to determine how the poleshift.ning is run. As I said before - it is owned by someone who can make his own rules as he sees fit.  No point complaining if it's not for you - just get on with your life elsewhere and stop whining.

     

  • Cheryl, the logic of your arguments is so perverse that I don't see any possibility of holding a meaningful discussion with you on this trench subject that you are now banging on about.  First you 'bust' the China mirage ZT, now the trench advice, what's next?

    AGAIN - the Zetas are not claiming to be the inventors of the trench and nor do they give specifics on how to construct your trench other then be shallow, covered, not too wide and it doesn't have to be that long; it's up to the people digging the trench to use their BRAINS to make sure it is safe.

    And look at the logical progression of your argument here:

    ZT says use a trench -- the idea was given to Nancy but doesn't specifically say 'by the Zetas' so could have been from the military -- the French military say trenches collapse -- therefore if the Zetas got their idea from the military, they must know the trenches will collapse -- therefore they are knowingly promoting a trench solution that will kill you.

    Somehow in the middle of it you are saying now that this particular bit of ZT is based on the French military's experience of building trenches almost 100 years ago!!  That's just so far out there I don't know what to say - is this all you can come up with to back up your claim that you've 'busted' ZT again?

  • Yes, msred, a good idea.  Everyone who wants to continue this discuss, please move over to the new ZT Analysis blog at https://earthchanges.ning.com/profiles/blogs/zt-analysis-are-trench.
  •  

    Astronauts see Angels

  • Well what I should have said about the zeta site is SOME of their survival info is valid.  Sorry!
  • "The best solution was one given to our Emissary, Nancy, years ago, which she detailed as a trench solution."

    http://www.zetatalk.com/poleshft/p177.htm

    Sorry, but Nancy can't wrap this up into Zeta copyright.  It was created by active militaries and the knowledge has been in the public domain for a long time.  I also love the writing style.  "The best solution was given to our Emissary...."  Always be wary of passive tense because it hides who said something, also in the category of wriggle words.  Doing some military history research also fits the statement.  "The best solution was one given to Cheryl...."  Who gave the solution?  Why, the article I cited gave me the solution.

    The ZT on this doesn't specifically state the Zetas were the givers, now does it?  But it is heavily implied.  

    Since the French military has shown how most trench shelters turned to mud and collapsed in the field, can we believe that air won't be sucked out of a trench, no matter how long it is? 

    And, if the Zetas got their idea from the military, French or otherwise, to give to Nancy, then surely they knew the trench would turn to mud and collapse.  Why would they recommend a faulty solution?

This reply was deleted.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives