All Posts (195)

Sort by

This website provides data for the progress of the Remote Viewing Farsight Experiment for 2013 Climate Change.

Climate Change 2013 Remote Viewing Progress

Welcome to Project Climate change 2013

Climate change 2013 project
During 2008 eight Remote Viewers from three separate Remote Viewing schools participated in a joint public project to study climate and planetary change between the years 2008 and 2013.

Nine geographic earth locations were chosen for two time periods: 2008 (a baseline) and the later date of 2013 to see if the remote viewing data could discern any changes in climate.

The predictive Remote viewing data seems to indicate serious global climate changes across all nine target locations chosen for the project.

“In general, these remote-viewing data suggest the following types of physical changes across many of the above geographical locations by mid-2013:

  1. Impacts from what appear to be large meteors, tsunamis and possible volcanism
  2. Extensive and forceful flooding of coastal areas
  3. Excessive solar radiation
  4. Storms and other severe weather”

Within this website we will present an overview of the project and will also gather &  present the climate change news  during 2013 as a form of feedback as it happens so that we can all compare against the predicted Remote Viewing data for overall accuracy.


For full details on the entire project, all the actual remote viewing sessions, project management, analysis and much more then please click here for the Farsight Website.

Read more…

http://www.transients.info/2013/05/maps-of-global-coastal-event-and.html?utm_source=feedburner  Edger Casey, navy map, Zeta and many more I have not seen, Mythi just said they are not accurate. Of all I would have to say Casey's would be my choice by his incredible track record of predictions. Even so a quadrillion  things have changed in the universe and on Earth since Casey's time.

Read more…

We just had 3 X class solar flares

Share0

pin it button Threes a Charm! Another X Flare!
email Threes a Charm! Another X Flare!

The unnamed region on the east limb has produced a 3rd X-class flare! (Updated)

11:44 UT – The NASA GSFC Space Weather Research Center has estimated that the CME will merge with CMEs associated with the 2 X-flares (X1.7 and X2.8) and may give a glancing blow to STEREO B (~05/15/2013 18:00 UT) and Epoxi (~05/16/2013 00:00 UT) and hit Spitzer (~05/15/2013 06:00 UT).

20130513 051200 anim.tim den Threes a Charm! Another X Flare!

NASA Space Weather Research Center ENLIL CME Model

 

11:36 UT - The SOHO/LASCO C2 instrument observed a fast CME (~2200 km/s), non-Earth directed, associated with the X3.2 flare. STEREO Behind’s Cor2 alway observed the CME.

X3 2 CME.001 570x427 Threes a Charm! Another X Flare!
Read more…

Paradigm Revolutionary: Dr Immanuel Velikovsky

A law is but a deduction from experience and experiment, and therefore laws must conform with historical facts, not facts with law"

---Immanuel Velikovsky

I consider Immanuel Velikovsky to be one of the most influential minds in the last few centuries. He was a genius on par with Einstein, and a revolutionary thinker. It is however, unfortunate that many are completely unaware of this man. 

Velikovsky was a Russian born scholar who at a younger age attained a medical degree and then went on to study and practice aspects of Psychology under Freud's first pupil Wilhelm Stekel. Throughout his early life he became very much interested in the Jewish literature, mythology and biblical origins of his earlier religious familial faith. He eventually moved to the U.S.A where he first produced a book about the Oedipus narrative in conjunction with Psychological theory. Studying old manuscripts set him off along academic paths of comparative mythology - to which he would eventually write his first heavily controversial book "Worlds in Collision"

Worlds in Collision quickly became a number 1 bestseller in the U.S, and its audience of academics became deeply divided. Quite a few ridiculed his ideas without ever having read his work, while a separate group of intellectuals hailed him as a revolutionary thinker. Later on this became known as the Velikovsky Affair - and many drew parallels to persecution of Newton's ideas. 

Why was this book so controversial?

For the first time a scholar used multiple disciplines, drawing on historical records to paint a picture of modern humanity.  This mostly angered the geologists and archaeologists of the day who saw his interdisciplinary approach as meaningless, of not pseudo scientific-work. Geological inquiry has no place for historical, cultural connections - and even archaeological. Using a myriad of cultural texts from around the world as a basis, Velikovsky lays out a framework in which to explain those based on modern scientific data. The real reason this caused an uprising was simply because it threatened the very basis of Geological and Archaeological inquiry; the doctrine of Uniformity.

 

"The tradition of many peoples persist that seas were torn apart and their water heaped high and thrown upon the continents. In order to establish that these traditions refer to one and the same event, or at least to an event of the same order, we must keep to this guiding sequence: the great tide followed a disturbance in the motion of the earth...The Chinese annals say that in the time of Emperor Yahou the sun did not go down for ten days, the world was in flames and in "their vast extent the waters over topped the great heights".

The traditions of the people of Peru tell that for a period of time equal to five days and five nights the sun was not in the sky, and then the ocean left the shore and with a terrible din broke over the continent; the entire surface of the earth was changed in a catastrophe. The Choctaw Indians of Oklahoma relate: "The earth was plunged in darkness for a long time - a bright light appeared in the north, "but it was mountain-high-waves, rapidly coming nearer." The Midrashim contain the following description: "The waters were piled up on to the height of the sixteen hundred miles, and they could be seen by all the nations on the earth."  (Velikovsky: 57, Worlds in Collision)

His central thesis was that in our not-so-distant past a giant comet must have swung close to the Earth, playing havoc on life and eventually re-instating itself as the planet venus  The impact of this event would not only have caused devastation and witness accounts on Earth but would have left traces within our neighboring planets as well. Of course, long after Velikovsky passed on many of his theories about planetary bodies came true .

On 14 October 1953, Immanuel Velikovsky, addressing the Forum of the Graduate College of Princeton University in a lecture entitled "Worlds in Collision in the Light of Recent Finds in Archaeology, Geology and Astronomy: Refuted or Verified?," concluded the lecture as follows: "The planet Jupiter is cold, yet its gases are in motion. It appears probable to me that it sends out radio noises as do the sun and the stars. I suggest that this be investigated."

Soon after that date, the text of the lecture was deposited with each of us [it is printed as supplement to Velikovsky's Earth in Upheaval (Doubleday, 1955)]. Eight months later, in June 1954, Velikovsky, in a letter, requested Albert Einstein to use his influence to have Jupiter surveyed for radio emission. The letter, with Einstein's marginal notes commenting on this proposal, is before us. Ten more months passed, and on 5 April 1955 B. F. Burke and K. L. Franklin of the Carnegie Institution announced the chance detection of strong radio signals emanating from Jupiter. They recorded the signals for several weeks before they correctly identified the source.

This discovery came as something of a surprise because radio astronomers had never expected a body as cold as Jupiter to emit radio waves (1).

In 1960 V. Radhakrishnah of India and J. A. Roberts of Australia, working at California Institute of Technology, established the existence of a radiation belt encompassing Jupiter "giving 1014 times as much radio energy as the Van Allen belts around the earth."

On 5 December 1956, through the kind services of H. H. Hess, chairman of the department of geology of Princeton University, Velikovsky submitted a memorandum to the U. S. National Committee for the (planned) IGY in which he suggested the existence of a terrestrial magnetosphere reaching the moon. Receipt of the memorandum was acknowledged by E. O. Hulburt for the Committee. The magnetosphere was discovered in 1958 by Van Allen.

In the last chapter of his Worlds in Collision (1950), Velikovsky stated that the surface of Venus must be very hot, even though in 1950 the temperature of the cloud surface of Venus was known to be -25°C on the day and night sides alike.

n 1954 N. A. Kozyrev (2) observed an emission spectrum from the night side of Venus but ascribed it to discharges in the upper layers of its atmosphere. He calculated that the temperature of the surface of Venus must be +30 C; somewhat higher values were found earlier by Adel and Herzberg. As late as 1959, V. A. Firsoff arrived at a figure of +17.5°C for the mean surface temperature of Venus, only a little above the mean annual temperature of the earth (+14.2°C) (3).

However, by 1961 it became known that the surface temperature of Venus is "almost 600 degrees [K]" (4). F. D. Drake described this discovery as "a surprise ... in a field in which the fewest surprises were expected." "We would have expected a temperature only greater than that of the earth ... Sources of internal heating [radioactivity] will not produce an enhanced surface temperature. Cornell H. Mayer writes (5), "All the observations are consistent with a temperature of almost 600 degrees," and admits that "the temperature is much higher than anyone would have predicted."

Source

"Immanuel Velikovsky concluded from his extensive interdisciplinary research that the planet Venus was remembered from the time of the dawn of civilization as a brilliant cometary body. While there is a wealth of literal sources to draw upon, when it comes to the pictorial evidence it isn't as forthcoming. No images can be conclusively identified as actually representing Venus in cometary form, a situation that essentially shouldn't exist. After all, it stands to reason that it was naked eye observations that inspired the myths. So, at the very least the imagery should be equal to or analogous to the literal sources – but this clearly isn't the case....."

rest HERE

Read more…

Below are some pictures I took from Google Earth, with a few from Nazca I took a while back. Very exciting stuff!

Birds Eye View of the South African Geoglyphs

This is simply an amazing discovery. If you don't have google Earth, go download and punch in these co-ordinates: -30.016954, 21.096132.

Some of these patterns remind me of some photo's i took of Nazca awhile back from Google Earth. Check it out!

(Above) Taken with Google Earth, from South Africa. I used photoshop to bring out the shadows and contrast. Notice the geometry - the paralell and crossing lines - and in the center / left what looks like a faded, large circular pattern.

 (Above) Taken with Google Earth, of South Africa. Photoshop used to adjust contrast. Notice the large pattern stretching into the frame from the right - an animal of sorts?. Throughout the middle and left you see the spiral drawings - hundreds and hundreds of them. You will also notice the carved path way through the mid area - again like Nazca. Unsure if this is a modern road, or not.

(Above) Closer view of some spiral sections with various other patterns and lines. South Africa.

(Above) Another view of the spirals, with more obscure patterns. To the left, a carved - straight section. I am curious about the lighter 'bird' shaped area near the middle / bottom area of the photograph. The dark, black section makes it look like small walls or something. With sand having filled it in? 

(Above) Close up view of the spiral and surrounding patterns. South Africa

Rest HERE

Read more…

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives