I.Planteamiento of the matter.
We recently received an important testimony to a reader (we'll call Eduardo) has allowed us to understand practically an event linked to the paradox of the space-time curvature and the realities supersymmetric.
We asked for their agreement to publish the testimony, given its importance in relation to the formulation of the RCD.
Description of Witness:
1.-Age: 40 years. Training: (PhD). Profession: (Specialist in Dermatology).
2.-Ciudad/Lugar where the event occurred: (Monterrey MX). In the high Underground.
3.-Dia/Mes Time (Thursday, November 19, 2009), 21.30 local time.
4.-Outdoor temperature: (17-19 º C).
5.-Presence of other witnesses: (Yes, the companion to traveling on the Metro, confirms whether your version).
6.-subjective circumstances: (None of the witnesses was under the influence of any substance stimulating, exciting and / or derivatives. His condition was normal, and aware.) Route: Work at home on return journey. The witness has no religious beliefs.
7.-Witness Credibility: High.
8.-Literal Description of Witness:
As the month of November. 2009, in the third or fourth week of it, (we believe it was Thursday), at about 21:30 hrs, we were my friend and I await the arrival of meters high. By some fresh (17-19oC). Meanwhile, sitting talked of the weather. Once arrived we boarded the subway car just before last level where you articulate and unite two of the same, so that the interior resembles a single wagon, making the space obviously greater for higher quota of passengers. This is a corridor between two cars and space where transit passengers within them. The number of people was approx. 95-98 as 38 being seated and the foot rest (I verified this fact in later days, observing the quota in a Day about high flow of passengers).
By raising such was the volume of people we had no choice but to stay just outside the entrance door of the car. We were located just steps away from the junction that connects the two spaces. While my back leaning on the doors of the car, my friend was placed before me, his back to the other passengers. My visual field was obviously wider than hers. Being able to comfortably see the entire environment from one side or the other. Since my height is 1.83mts could see perfectly the universe of people on both cars. Take into account that the average height of most in my community, fluctuates between 1.50mts. to 1.70mts. We would say that my vision was optimal for viewing the environment.
Within seconds the progress meter (20-30segundos) made the comment of how uncomfortable the trip and said, "seem canned sardines." To our surprise when we burst out laughing smile and it just said, we witnessed something unprecedented: both the comment and the laughter we hear crisp, clear and intensely.
The reason: a sudden and unexpected SILENCE. Then my friend said, "Hey look .... you saw! They are all as frozen " Then, stretching out to watch the side and front, as well as those who were behind my friend, is that we realized that neither blinked nor to any sound or gesture. They had varying positions. So I would say rather strange. Corresponded to the last moment or immediately prior to his state of immobility or "freezing". I asked my friend who saw the time and take notice of the time elapsed for a time reference of the event. While this did, we watched and said, "is true, are like mannequins." The silence was overwhelming especially because our voices dominated the room acoustics. Immediately I asked the question aloud: "But you and I are not so? ". At the same time I issued a bombastic expression of surprise, a term that certainly roll across the space of wagons due to the prevailing silence. After a moment equivalent to a minute and a half in which they gave or took the phenomenon, we take surprise the sudden physical activity (movement) and sound effect (conversations) of all passengers. Each continuing with the actions that had stopped abruptly before that minute and a half. From a bride and groom based and chatting to a subject by reading and leafing through a newspaper. The two of us we were just seeing each other as we watched the group of people appreciating the classic moving unintelligible murmur is heard in a subway car packed. During the rest of the trip and we question what happened razonábamos without obtaining a logical justification. At most I assumed an altered space-time, distant to be understood by me or my friend due to little or no knowledge we have about classical or quantum physics.
II.-Hypothesis.
To demonstrate the paradox of the fold space-time supersymmetric under overlapping realities.
III.-Formulation of Paradox.
It is impossible to address the issue of time untreated space. A new concept on the graininess of space and time. Just as there are grains of energy (quanta), there are grains of sand in the invisible space-time clock. In some ways, the grains are grains temporary energy. In the case of the discrete space (dashed), the theorist Alain Connes non-commutative geometry visualized, thus giving rise to the presence of spatial structures that showed a discontinuous nature (hyperfine structure mesh network) without violating the symmetries fundamentales.Las spatial coordinates have been replaced by "operators of algebra" is not commutative. Therefore, the order of their use is not random.
These geometries appear to restore the usual properties of space in the larger scales, in particular the spatial isotropy, ie invariant under rotation. It should be noted that mesh networks were invented to respond to the axiomatic restriction of the absence of divergence. In other words, we create the means to give us the reason.
The problem with these non-commutative geometry is actually proposing a configuration with no time or space, the very negation of the universal dynamics. Something that baffles most orthodox scientists as evidence the limitations of pure Cartesian method. The discrete time seems to bring us problems. By observing the quantum of time a temporary particle type, is certainly difficult for us to imagine the nature of the intervals between the particles, called chronons. Is this time non-storm? Does this mean that time stopped? We think that the problem can be formulated in these words, but in terms of information and, you see, in terms of unavailability of energy. If no information, no time. By contrast, if many, or an infinite amount of information, there are plenty of those storms. That is the very principle of fractal time. In other words, plenty of time is the opposite of infinity of space. Time quanta are disappearing as quantum space, which would explain the existence of energy-related information and why not available in certain parts of space. These are the premises of the solution offered by the absolute relativity.
In this regard: Klein said: "Thanks to the standard model of particle physics is that we can describe the behavior of elementary particles and their interactions at scales close to10-18 meters ... However, at distances much smaller, is required new physics. Its development will definitely change our representation of space and time. "
1.-The framework of absolute relativity.
In absolute relativity, the occurrence of phenomena is subject to the flow of time. This reasoning is contrary to what is accepted today in orthodox physics.
If we represent as an hourglass, we would have different diagrams of segments. Roughly speaking, the hourglass would spin spherical shape in all positions and segments, following the logic of Euler-Fibonacci binomial theorem and the Euler-Fourier differential. (Interestingly this sequence of rotation would be identical to the structure of aether.)
The jumps are progressively smaller quanta following a logic of reason fractal phi in each sequence represented by the field (circle). Linear time corresponds to the line that traces the center of the figure, the higher the field, the fractal sequence is different, and remember that the waves are in convolution with different wavelengths.
2.-time properties.
Thus, the time would have three distinct dimensions which combined lead to a more complex, but in line with the proposed Kosirev and Pancheluga, but adding the complexity of the equation of space-time decision.
2.1.-time address: tiempo.Esta flow direction is a time sequence that establishes the cause-effect relationship. More specifically, the time arrow. This describes the transformation of matter and visible events. The direction of time is not linear, but discontinua.La time direction fluctuates with the vertical and horizontal axis (depending on the directions of the segment) that can be represented by an axis of a function. The most acceptable is therefore natural time arrow going past the future. The second direction is the future to the past, this is more difficult to interpret because it occurs beyond a specific rate of flow or density (vertical property). Investment is not applicable to all scales fractales.La keyword is transformation. Is the direction of the fluctuation of time units during an exchange of information or in motion. Unit of time: the temporal (Qt) as traditional units of linear measure we used in this scale.
The direction of time, gives rise to two fundamental properties: horizontal and vertical ownership time. Each time line would be a fractal of another line of time. In turn, the situation from the viewpoint of the observer implies a different perception in a logarithmic sequence. The objective measurement of time always depends on the observer, the agent never moves in time.
Drs Victor A. Panchelyuga and Simon E. Shnoll, as demonstrated in 2007 applied to linear time in "On the Dependence of a Local-Time Effect on Spatial Direction." As we move forward in the study of Quantum Logic Differential RF, we find that the analysis of the time scale converges in the same terms as the global scalar theory.
So far we understood it as a linear objective dimension from our point of view of observers in a given position in the Universe: That is, the Earth, located in the solar system, within the "cluster" for the Orion arm in the Milky Way , etc ... have always assumed that the time elapse in the same way as inexorably as a function of rotation of the earth, rotating it around the sun, etc ... (would arise Years, months, on the hour the minutes and seconds.) Thus, we know that we have universalized a subjective measure based on a computation based on observation of segments positions of our planet around its astrophysical context.
However, scientifically we know that time does not exist. To put it more correctly: What is missing is the Universal linear time, since what really exists is a set of linear fractals times are relative to the observer and positions based on quantum events of a global scale Universe.
Therefore, we can not speak strictly linear time, but time multi-scalar. Each time scale of a fractal multitiempo and it would fluctuate in different directions at different speeds and different pasts and generate fututros supersymmetric scenarios in which successive lines intersectarían alternatives with other timelines that long-term fractal are converging on a logarithmic.
We will try to explain in a very simple and accessible to any reader, and then discuss its implications on a global level.
Suppose we face a tense situation that might question the way in which our future unfolds against a backdrop of potential alternatives that require one or more decisions temporary immediate present, to change the course of future events.
The slowing of time in moments of emotional stress comes literally to generate perceptions of fractions of a second in which we are aware of each position, movement and / or thought. Our mind works in those moments of conscious processing billions of data per tenth of a second, and allows us to make a concrete decision in a certain direction. (For example, when driving a vehicle or even when we perform many administrative procedures required to achieve a given management in a single moment of time).
We have all experienced times when we have the perception of course extremely fast or slow time, and interestingly, in that path simultaneously experiencing extremely rapid acceleration of quantum events, events, emotions, experiences, etc ... that have changed our lives. It is only from this mental perception as you can come to understand the time and explain it in a mathematical model.
From an outside observer, would last two months, but in that interval of time, my life could turn around 180 degrees and even at time intervals of less than one second, I can usually be managed processes that could have taken me years under certain circumstances.
2.2.-density time: Fluidity of the arrow of time. The relative amount of time affects the behavior of matter and events. Describe your conversion rate. The density of time is not linear but discontinuous, therefore, fractal and implies that events are more or less present in amounts of time defined by convention. In other words, at a time density D, there is less information than a density D +1. The density can be represented by a graph that describes the axis of a transition density to another.
The higher the density of time, the greater the number of quanta tiempo.Todas spend time densities simultaneously (elejemplo hourglass), both past and future, but at different spatial scales. The more temporal density is, the farther we get into the past and the future.
The lower the density of matter greater fold space-time, which means less wasted energy. The issue of growing links with the perception of time as a magnitude of consciousness. From our awareness we can stop time, we really can even bend space and changing realities brought to us the effects of the decisions we make. We know in detail the Afshordi Niayesh study, in which the idea that the universe is within a wormhole, offers another explanation: A wormhole expands at both ends.
In this line the journal Physics Letters. no room for doubt on stage again.
The most controversial issue once again is to understand that there are infinitely many universes, interconnected, and interacting in a large metaverse, as we are part of primal energy.
We are in continuous motion energy, and as we become aware of this movement, interact in the cosmos like we were cosmic avatars. The question is that we have the genetic capacity to become aware of the realities linear quantum from the self.
From this logic cohesive, to converge with our own emotional processes, we modify the reality generating a context of "fold space-time" that allows you to interact in our stages of life. The question is more about speed of decision making in the decisions themselves.
In this regard, we recommend recall the concept of "phase waves". In this regard, consideration of time lines, involve: The superposition of two or more waves built into a cluster or group of waves, acts at two different speeds: its normal speed phase and group velocity. This is precisely the reason that gravity can not be regarded as a force emanating from the stellar objects, but is a set of waves (they absorb half).
2.3.-The lines of time: It involves the alignment of temporary few harmonic frequencies. The fluctuation of this is connected with the cyclical nature of the events when they return to the starting point. This is not subject to direction or the density of the time, but is the bond between them. Is a common number of time units between different densities of time. Therefore we can speak of three timelines: from this (linear) line from present to past and Line from the present to future. Following Kozyrev (NA Kozyrev, Nasonov VV "Properties of Time Discovered Through Astronomical Observations" 1980. Academy of Sciences USSR).
Even if it not possible to calculate the future, The Possibility of Observing the future you Become Extraordinarily real "
Considering what we have learned in STV20100817 , the envelope of all the measures would always be a supersymmetric structure with the three brands added, implying a simultaneous alternative scenario for each event. Where, for each address as outlined in (See STV20100817 ) have a mark or line on the different measurement time. Now, with reference to each of the directions T (Linear Time) we said previously (Pt-n; PT0 and Pt + n), and substituting as shown in the graph G, the reference values would have a strip that would be represented by all (Pt-n; pT0 pt + n) grouped to the right of the graph would have a logarithmic form as in Fig. Each representation of a T, take your partner (Pt-n; pT0 pt + n) different at each point.
3.-In conclusion:
Three lines of time superimposed with different levels of density. Therefore, we have: 1 º.-That there would be at least three baselines in the universe that surround a cluster, different rates of realities supersymmetric (line of Present, Past and Future ) supersymmetric one another. It would mean that if we superimpose from a three-dimensional perspective the universe, we find a logarithmic structure continuously covered by three different types of converging waves corresponding to different times or rates, which represent realities supersymmetric alternatives. 2 °. That the gravity is a means, a " super cool "composed of different wavelengths. Everything in the universe uses and absorbs these waves. The time travel / space realities modify timelines supersymmetric matrix, so that open different alternative situations superimposed not necessarily interact. Each scenario is unique and infinitesimal of a combination of billions of alternative scenarios possible. 3 °. That the black holes and other stellar objects mass would be broken down into at least two realities supersymmetric or toroidal / fractals corresponding set T (tn , t0, t +1) where t0 is the (present), tn (past) and t +1 (future).
IV.-Realities and supersymmetric scenarios.
Each particular situation would lead to at least "n" supersymmetric alternative realities. In each of these alternative realities are present but with different qualities, and we have made different decisions (equations of decision). So far the testing simplificábamos the choice of two realities supersymmetric to facilitate understanding of the issue.
If we take the upper segment diagram, and put it in relation to the central equation, we are not observers to become the same equation. That is, we take the choice between different segments of the diagram above. Each segment involves a combination of sub-decisions that come from the past, present and future in their respective lines. Each scenario involves a reality, it interacts with different agents subject, circumstances, problems and solutions. In each segment time passes at different densities that are not homogeneous with each other. In each segment, a decision is based on previous choice and generates other consequences later. Suppose someone, an intelligence to take the global view of all these scenarios and contemplated from outside, that way would have the overview of all segments and realities (as when viewing on your PC a preview of all folders containing our hard disk. If subiéramos one more level, contemplaríamos all drives on your PC and peripherals (Network Elements connected), but would no longer see the files. If subiéramos another level, we begin to see all networked PCs that Server depend on the relevant Local Area Network, etc ...) And so on, as we contemplate the big picture to see the specific elements of the decision equation.
This intelligence is the ability to choose between different levels and planes in perspective because it may take more or less wavelength, see the files on your computer (the data in Table Cartesian in reality) in each folder (segment). The diagram is familiar and look like this:
Each line represents a sequence of logarithmic densities at different time scale from the Aeons (The upper envelope) to the Atosegundos (The smallest unit), from their perspective, you can move from the Aeon to attosecond in a second, like we can from our PC down to a particular file from a directory.
From the aether (The least dense known) until the moment before the Big Bang (The densest known). To do this simply positioned in the center of the diagram of segments and increase / decrease its viewing range. (Increase or decrease the density of the time).
If you decide to position themselves in a particular segment of the diagram of segments, the equation would exercise decision, moving the hourglass in different positions depending on the properties of time.
Each segment of the diagram corresponds to the total density (from alpha to omega) is, from beginning to end (the aether to the big bang) and most dense (contraction) to the less dense (expansion).
From Source to view the origin and purpose of continuously and simultaneously at different levels (segments).
Returning to the testimony with which encabezábamos the article:
What if under certain circumstances the changes in electromagnetic waves, there are changes in the density of the time?. An objective change in the vertical property of the time. For the "observer" has passed attosecond for the "traveler" may have elapsed and a half minutes. During this half minutes and go to rest as "frozen" by effect of relativity in an absolute point convolution of waves having different lengths and therefore the time presented in each different "density." All travel in the same wagon train, but not in the same spatial plane (dimension).
Notes:
If someone has lived a strange experience, like that described, please contact us at starviewerteam@gmail.com
Draw your own conclusions.
StarViewerTeam International 2011.
