NASA has known since 1983 that our solar system is binary. Scientific evidence. Struggle for truth (about) X. Mystery solved.
Posted on August 9 2009 by Starviewer
The present article of research is based and compared with all the data available from official sources and shows that since 1983, the existence of a brown star orbiting our solar system has been known.
We can clearly identify three stages: stage 1981-1989 corresponds to the discovery; 1990-2002 to the scientific study and official publication, and finally, 2003-2009, to the stage of cover-up of the results.
1. The stage of discovery (1981-1989).
Seeking to complete the orbital model of the solar system and make the facts obtained by the space exploration vehicles and instruments, the following interesting article appears in 1981 in the “Detroit News”:
The Detroit News-1981
This article reflects on the historic evidence of the knowledge of the Sumerians about our solar system, in view of recent scientific releases that tried to complete the design of our solar system, and by then (1981), since the admitted knowledge of the Kuiper-Oort cloud was as yet very little. At this time, astronomers were considering the idea that more objects were to be found even further than Pluto, as this one´s orbit, as well as those of Uranus and Neptune, presented anomalies that seemed explainable only by the existence of other planets beyond Pluto.
And so it was. In 1983, the IRAS telescope, a powerful infra-red telescope, discovered in 1984 the anomaly in the Oort cloud as well as the existence of a group of objects, all relatively close to each other that were clearly a part of our solar system.
On December 31, 1983, the daily “Washington Post” published on its front page this discovery in a large head-line that said:
Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered
And said textually:
A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would be part of this solar system has been found in the direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical satellite. So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby “protostar” that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through. “All I can tell you is that we don’t know what it is,” Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS chief scientist for California’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and director of the Palomar Observatory for the California Institute of Technology said in an interview.
(the complete text can be obtained here: )
From that moment on, it was decided to search for the facts that would permit the following up of a new line of research, based on observation of the orbits and an analysis of the nature of the anomalies in Oort.
This initial discovery and the preliminary research was concluded in 1989 with the subsequent publication in 1991 of a scientific paper by the University of Harvard in which it was stated that the anomalies came from the region of Sagittarius and were, surely, caused by a brown dwarf, a new type of stellar body unknown hitherto.
In the said publication, there appeared the following drawing:
En dicho informe, aparece expresamente el siguiente esquema:
Observe that it is quite clear as was found between 1989-1991, that the existence of the brown dwarf was exactly known and that it was what caused the anomalies in the solar system, and further, that it orbited it.
Phase 2 started at this point.
2. The second state of the researches, orbital simulations and study of the orbital impulse of the object began then. (1989-2002).
In this stage, a committee of experts, headed by J. Matese and J. Murray, began the deep research of this new discovery and as of October 1999, concluded as follows:
Planetary Systems in the Universe: Observation, Formation and Evolution
ASP Conference Series, Vol.
A.J. Penny, P. Artymowicz, A.-M. Lagrange, and S.S. Russell, eds.
3 108, 1999
Supportive Evidence for a Brown Dwarf Solar Companion
John J. Matese
University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette LA USA 70504-4210
Abstract.
comet orbital elements which suggested that there may be a Jovian-mass brown dwarf in our solar system. An extended cometary database is now available. The analyses have been repeated and we nd that the set of statistically signi cant correlated anomalies is enhanced. We also respond to unsupported objections that have been raised to this conjecture. If real, the wide-binary object would constitute a natural dynamical intermediary between gas giant planetary objects and isolated objects.
We have previously given evidence based on Oort cloud.
The complete file can be obtained here (aquí)
Obviously, said report was sent to NASA who had sponsored it, under cover of a letter from Dr.Matese, that you can read at the link below:
http://starviewer.wordpress.com/2009/07/22/la-carta-original-del-dr-murray-hace-20-anos-no-le-hicieron-ni-caso/
At that moment, an investigative committee named ICARUS was formed, whose purpose was in detailing the knowledge of the orbit of the brown dwarf and the consequent anomalies observed in Sagittarius. This committee, headed by J. Matese and was later joined by other prominent astrophysics like Dr. Lissauer. This investigation was concluded in 2002, and succeeded in defining the effect known as Stellar Impulse, and published their report in LMM, estimating that this impulse was responsible by 41% for the anomalies in the Oort cloud. (This study is the most complete made by the scientific community and it is on the basis of its conclusions that we base our calculations contained in the following work:
http://starviewer.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/analisis-de-g1-90-3-espectros-infrared-microondas-rayos-x-hoja-de-trabajo-n-ii/
Once the preceding has been stated, on October 7, 1999, the scientific editor of the NBC magazine, Mr. Alan Boyle, published an article in the science department that says:
A mystery revolves around the sun
Scientists suggest huge unseen object orbits on fringe of solar system.
Oct. 7, 1999 – Two teams of researchers have proposed the existence of an unseen planet or a failed star circling the sun at a distance of more than 2 trillion miles, far beyond the orbits of the nine known planets. The theory, which seeks to explain patterns in comets’ paths, has been put forward in research accepted for publication in two separate journals.Speculation about the existence of unseen celestial companions dates back far before the discovery of Pluto in 1930 — and even figures in more recent fringe phenomena such as the 1997 “Heaven’s Gate” tragedy and talk of a new “Planet X.” This latest hypothesis, however, is aimed at answering nagging scientific questions about how particular types of comets make their way into the inner solar system.
Some comets, like Halley’s Comet, follow relatively short-period orbits — circling the sun in less than two hundred years. These comets are thought to originate in the Kuiper Belt, a disk of cosmic debris that lies beyond Neptune’s orbit.
Source and complete text available at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3077838/
However, this news was not restricted to this media as, under the same date, the same evidence is published by Harvard. Stating that the news released by the press is based on a study made and published by said University, it being of public interest and raised to the level of an Official research. This will be found at the following link:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Icar..141..354M
We reproduce this in full as follows:
Title: | | Cometary Evidence of a Massive Body in the Outer Oort Clouds |
Authors: | | Matese, J. J.; Whitman, P. G.; Whitmire, D. P. |
Affiliation: | | AA(), AB(Department of Physics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana), AC(Department of Physics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana) |
Publication: | | Icarus, Volume 141, Issue Icarus, pp. 354-366. (Icarus Homepage) |
Publication Date: | | 10/1999 |
Origin: | | ICAR |
Abstract Copyright: | | (c) 1999: Academic Press |
DOI: | | 10.1006/icar.1999.6177 |
Bibliographic Code: | | 1999Icar..141..354M |
