The current severe weather in the northern hemisphere provoked this question.
Where is a safe location if a significant portion of the northern hemisphere is buried under snow and ice? Have we been misled that there is such an animal? Have we ever been advised to prepare for heavy snow and ice in addition to a safe location (traditionally meaning safe from rising seas, large bodies of water, mountain building, extraordinary earthquakes, volcanoes, etc.)? Did NZT miss some important factors to consider in determining a safe location?
Further, will a trench covered with a metal roof and sod keep us from drowning in heavy rains or keep us from freezing to death if a mini ice age does indeed blanket the northern hemisphere during the passage?
ZT hasn't talked about the Gulf Stream slowing/stopping, yet the phenomena has been known since at least 2005. There was a recent mention that it wouldn't be a source of problems, yet look at the winter the UK/Europe is having...predicted to be the coldest in a 1,000 years, when another mini ice age occurred.
And all the "lowlands" expected to flood? How do they flood if they are frozen before the passage? I understand that water could wash over them, but my point is that the data was presented as something people would have to plan for and evacuate from. However, now it looks like they will need to evacuate because of the deep freeze. In other words, NZT did not see climate change/freezing temperatures coming. She didn't see the Gulf Stream slowing/stopping as significant and brushed it off. And she was blindsided, proving again that she is not getting her information from intelligent extraterrestrials.
We need to rethink our safe locations and factor in protection from the elements as well.
And check out this link https://earthchanges.ning.com/profiles/blogs/is-a-several-hundred-foot to see if a several-hundred-feet-in-elevation is really high enough if you are anywhere near large bodies of water.
UPDATE: 06/21/2011: Terral Croft has a map in his latest video, 7-7-11 Warning, that shows areas, such as the Appalachians and East Coast, in extreme danger zones, contrary to the Safe Locations document published by ZetaTalk. Please examine Terral's map and decide if you need to alter your plans. I am in the Appalachians, touted by ZetaTalk as being a safe area. I don't buy the Zeta "water will dilute radiation" theory and think Terral's map makes more sense. Of course, that is just my opinion. You need to see the map: https://earthchanges.ning.com/profiles/blogs/terral-crofts-elenin-threat and decide for yourself.
Comments
Can you post a map of this paticular area? What city is close by?
The elite will be under ground and may likely die any way. What they built will not with stand 10 to 15 point magnitude earthquake and they would be buried a live. This is life or death and I choose to goe to live and no one will stop me. All would be fed where we are. After the event, rescue ships will recover all and we will be safe. The weather would be cold and changes will be 2 years. This depends what you be lieve now. I have a special symbol to use on the aftermath and have not been able to get it on Microsoft word cause for some mental reason they do not have a circle on their "draw". I also under stand this area to be a Plateau, not a cave system. I knoe of 3 cave systems that goe to the centre. Peru, Mammoth and Giza. Will they be dangerous ? Could be, especially will reptillian races be loe. The arcturan, pleiades,andromeda ( humans you call angels ) will be on rescue for all. There are currently 180 under ground bunkers being prepared now for the event and will be finished soon. There is much going on be hind the scenes................
I have one question about this cave system? Dont the elites have it guarded? Are they not allowing the public to enter or use any caves? This is what i have heard. And if everybody went there it would be too many in one place for survival to feed them all or contain there needs? I am not arguing the idea, just asking logical questions. Personally i think the idea is a good one.
The center of North Amerika is "Turtle Mountains, North Dakota". Yes, there is a safe place, and it is written in the "Popal Vu" that the last flood were survivors and they were a family in "The Dakotas". It wasnt called North/South Dakota back then. With more re search it is clearly proven that "Turtle Mountains",North Dakota is the safe place to goe, and I will be there. I left Chicago, and am in Deer Creek, Minnesota right now. The guy is kicking me out cause I do not want a relationship. Yup, me and my 5 cats have to leave, and that is fine, cause my intent is "Turtle mountains", North Dakota, so be be be.
The "elites" are trying to say the "Rugby", North Dakota is the centre but they are liars and want no survivors. Not only that the location in "Rugby was changed in 1935. They are liars and want you dead. Goe to "Turtle Mountains, North Dakota, and I tell you,,,put it out on every Social Network you have, and put it out on your "You Tube" Channel. Help each other. Tell all, even thoughs individuals you do not like cause after it happens I guarantee they have new out look on life and will not 1 be the same. They can except or re ject is there "free will".
The Scriptures tell us "buy truth but not sell it". Terral is selling his newsletters at his Web site. This is too commercial. From a normal reader point of view, he is trying to make money out of readers' fear.
Turtle Mountains, North Dakota is the only "real" safe place to goe for pole shift. Al though there are 2 entrances to caves that are reptilian,,,I much rather live with them, then be any where else with possible high winds, flooding and such. "Popal Vu", and a few other things I re searched prove that Turtle Mountains, North Dakota is survival place, even with its high lime content in the ground to keep it stable is great. Queen Lizard from UK bought last year a lot of land in Colorado cause UK is sinking and she "thinks" she will be safe. ( a lot of lime there ) I send all "Unconditional" love and no harm to any being and creation in all places : ) , be and amein !
Jonas, I'll start a blog on the Stereo images.
I think you are right, Alex. And no matter where you are, a sinkhole could open up beneath you no matter how well prepared you are.
This indicates that being settled in one place shouldn't be the primary focus; being prepared to move at a moment's notice and having a backpack with what's needed to live off the land and the knowledge and skills in our heads to do so. Then if there is time and money, invest in other things like food storage, things that would make life easier afterwards, but understand they could be destroyed.
Saying that there are "safe locations" is misleading, to say the least. It lowers one's situational awareness by believing you are in a "safe location." I think there are "safer" locations (like being away from coastlines or away from volcanoes) but nowhere will be safe. In addition to sinkholes opening up suddenly, think about incoming fireballs or firestorms that could strike anywhere. No one, even intelligent aliens, could possibly predict where they could fall, including right on top of your expensive, fully stocked retreat.
Simple answer to your question Cheryl is no there isn't. But safe is relative depending on what hardships you are facing. Someone in the mountains is safe from the flooding but may find themselves without air to breath or crushed during mountain building. Best we can hope for is a place that gives us a chance of survival.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next