Blogs

http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/24/extreme-weather-warning/

NEW GUINEA REGION P.N.G. 5.1

SOUTH SANDWHICH ISLANDS REGION 5.1

NEW BRITAIN REGION P.N.G. 4.8

OFF THE EAST COAST OF KAMCHATKA RUSSIA 4.8

SAN FRANCISCO BAY 2.6

NORTHERN IRAN 5.7

TURKMENISTAN 4.9

Analysis of artificiality in Stereo: Final Conclusions: Aetherofactos. Anomalies for 16 to August 28.

Posted on September 9, 2009

A guide to understanding COR2 STEREO coronagraph.

For this study we will confine only to the coronagraph COR2.

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b0.jpg?w=700&h=563

Click on link to view photo

A guide to understanding the position of Stereo

In this case the times the images are printed on a reverse time sequence to the previous example. This data may be misleading because the labeling is performed after selecting the final image.

FOV (range of observation): 2.0 - 15 Rsun (solar radii)

Resolution: 29.4 white light arc-sec

Cadence: an image every 20-30 min

Sequence of images taken with a polarizer in three positions of 0, 120 and 240

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/disenooptico.jpg?w=696&h=186

Click to see image

Stereo Optical design.

Resolution and Vignetting (relative area of the pupil):

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b2.jpg?w=338&h=203

Click to view image

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b1.jpg?w=325&h=203

Click to view image

4.-COR 2 images.

The Shadow COR2 made a certain exposure duration and cadence of 2 minutes between them with three different polar angles (0, 120 and 240 degrees). Once the shots, are stored and create sets of files called cor_polarize summary. STEREO software has, among others, certain routines that are responsible for looking at these summary files and find sets of three images taken in the COR 2, with the angles above and sequence of two minutes of each other in a maximum interval of 15 minutes between the first and last. If you find this series of three images and the rhythm is right, makes a FITS file polarized total brightness polarized triplet is the final image.

For images that do not have final processing will be called Stage 1. To those who only have a DOS polarized angles, Stage 2 will be called and which have been processed in full, STEP 3.

We see these images perfectly using image enhancement process mentioned above:

Stage 1, 2 and 3:

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b3.jpg?w=597&h=206

Click to view image

Stage> 1 mark

Stage> 3 marks

Stage> 9 marks

STEREO images in which you can see this process of improvement:

Image that you can see the different layers polarized in the halos of the disk and the luminosity:

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b4.jpg?w=700&h=259

Click to view

In this case the times the images are printed on a reverse time sequence to the previous example. This data may be misleading because the labeling is performed after selecting the final image.

Note that the bright spot-at 2:00 in image 3 -, and shows the planet Venus, it seems that does not show the same effect of repetition of points because the rate of motion of the planet in the image is very small.

Note these two images of the August 17, 2008:

Image that you can see the different layers polarized in the halos of the disk and the luminosity:

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b6.jpg?w=526&h=355

Click to view

Luminosities Aetherofactales

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b7.jpg?w=551&h=236

Click to view

A new example of the process also enables us to find the address of each light:

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b81.jpg?w=638&h=318

Click to view

In this case the times the images are printed on a reverse time sequence to the previous example. This data may be misleading because the labeling is performed after selecting the final image.

Note that the bright spot-at 2:00 in image 3 -, and shows the planet Venus, it seems that does not show the same effect of repetition of points because the rate of motion of the planet in the image is very small.

Note these two images of the August 17, 2008:

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b111.jpg?w=673&h=338

Click

In the course of 30 minutes the same pattern of six lights, what appears to be an intermediate stage between the 2 and 3.

In these images we can see that the light pattern is different types of lines and turns of all kinds:

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b131.jpg?w=644&h=576

Click

The previous images completely ruled shutter a possible defect and observed even turns in both directions, as the image on the right.

Intensities and sizes

We can also often observe different intensities of light that left these bright points in the images and they are inversely proportional to the length of the trace marked. These differences in intensity are due to different exposure times and therefore also to the different speeds:

a) A MAYOR travel speed of light -> less intensity and longer trace.

b) b) The lower the travel speed of light -> higher intensity and shorter trace.

In the following pictures you can see how the point of light in different intensities left the film due to increased speed (lower intensity and longer trace). This change in velocity could be due either to increased speed and the proximity of the object to the camera. We can find out which of the two parameters is more correct by the width of the trace. If it (the trace) is wider in the less light means that the speed increase is due to the object moon closer to the camera.

In the case of the following images, the speed increase is very high probability for bringing light to the camera point COR2.

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b141.jpg?w=680&h=346

Click

Like these:

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b151.jpg?w=681&h=340

Click

In the next image is not seen a large increase in the vicinity (that is, although lower), but an increase in speed by the separation between the pearls of light

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b152.jpg?w=681&h=340

Click

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b161.jpg?w=257&h=260

Click

When there is a sudden decrease of the brightness in one of the ends of the string of pearls of light, without any sign of increased length of the trace that would indicate more speed, what happens is easily explained if we think that far less light chain of pearls has been less exposure time because has closed the shutter. This case there will be no interior in a pearl chain.

An example of this is the image:

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b171.jpg?w=257&h=257

Click

It is clear that the bright spot at the far right is clearly less bright but maintains the same or very similar size as the previous trace.

In the following pictures we will see a true compendium of types of chains and trace widths:

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b181.jpg?w=688&h=343

Click

The planets visible from Stereo:

To see the difference between strings of pearls and had previously studied the planets captured by COR2, consider the following final images (STEP 3):

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b191.jpg?w=693&h=546

Click

http://starviewer.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/b201.jpg?w=694&h=357

Click

We can clearly see the clear difference between the impressions left by the planets and the "chains of pearls" left by other devices, they all have the same type of processing polarizer and the same exposure time.

Obvious artificiality.

After the analysis we can conclude that when two images are those COR string of pearls, we are eyewitnesses of the different impressions left by certain objects in the images of movement and speed variables and with evident signs of AI.

References:

System Suite Instrument Description ", Naval Research Laboratory / Praxis, Inc.

SECCHI Sun Earth Connection Coronal and Heliospheric Investigation (http://secchi.pxi.com)

STEREO / SECCHI - COR1_PBSERIES () (http://achilles.nascom.nasa.gov)

STEREO / SECCHI - SCCDOPOLAR () (http://achilles.nascom.nasa.gov/)

"Inner COR1 SECCHI coronagraph for STEREO-SECCHI" - William T. Thompson1, Joseph M. Davila2, Richard R. Fisher2 and others.

The Radiometric and pointing calibration of COR1 SECCHI on STEREO "- WT Thompson, NL Reginald.

• “STEREO SCIENCE WRITERS GUIDE” – National Aeronautics and Space Administration (http://www.nasa.gov)
• StarVieWerTeam (Thanks to Dadrev).

Tagged: aetherocuántica, Aetherofactos, aetherofactos August 16, aetherometry loops, antigravity, antigravity concepts, report conclusions, final report artificiality, extraterrestrial intelligence, artificial patterns 1608, STEREO

Posted in: intelligent artifacts in space, General Astrophysics, Scientific modeling century, antigravity

http://starviewer.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/analisis-de-la-artificialidad-en-stereo-conclusiones-definitivas-aetherofactos-anomalias-correspondientes-a-los-dias-16-a-28-de-agosto/

SUNSPOT 1084

THIS IS FIRST LIGHT ADAPTIVE OPTICS FROM THE NEW SOLAR TELESCOPE (NST) AT THE BIG BEAR SOLAR OBSERVATORY IN CALIFORNIA.

(http://spaceweather.com/)

NEAR THE WEST COAST OF HONSHU JAPAN 5.4 DEPTH 288KM (THIS WAS ON LAND)

TONGA 4.5 DEPTH 124.5KM

OFF THE COAST OF OREGON 3.9

GREATER LOS ANGELES AREA CA 2.5

SOUTHERN SAMATRA INDONESIA 5.0

SOUTH SANDWHICH ISLANDS REGION 5.3

NORTHERN PERU 5.1 DEPTH 118KM

Know all those magnetosphere charts Joe posts? Well, this is what Earth looks like when it is getting blasted. "The first solar storm of this cycle hit the Earth early this month, causing it to light up spectacularly." Source: NASA

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/technology/sun-storm-to-hit-with-force-of-100-bombs/story-e6frfro0-1225909999465