I have talked to the Zs about this off and on over the past few months. You have seen me express my personal skepticism about the 7 of 10 event happening before the end of 2010. Well, I'm now issuing an "official" opinion.
It will not happen. As the Zetas have said time and again, they DO NOT give out timeframes or deadlines. As they have said in previous ZT, the calculations are complex and change from minute to minute. Their viewpoint is that giving out a date would do more harm than good because it would most likely create useless panic and damage the credibility of the data intended to help people with.
Their mission is to try to keep the panic down and help people survive. Those that give out false timeframes have done so without permission and the Zetas explicitly deny having ever given out a date. They are forbidden, as you know.
Nancy is no longer "in the loop" and hasn't been for quite a while. They also say to beware the "wriggle room" Nancy builds into her purported ZT. Legitimate Zeta messages do not engage in such tactics.
Nancy's time is over. The Ambassador has landed. Things are going to be different.
UPDATE 12/13/10: The earlier ZT does not say anything about "the 7 will begin by the end of 2010." The language is clear. The 7 of 10 would happen by the end of 2010. "Beginning to happen" is new, to make excuses for a failed prediction. Of course, the Zetas didn't make the prediction in the first place so don't blame them.
UPDATE 12/17/10: Well, the backpedaling has begun. The latest holey writ (and the writ keeps getting holey-er, indeed) states: "The 7 of 10 will unfold but not as expected by many. It will not be a dramatic announcement on the news, as the establishment is ready for this, due to the extensive discussions." (Personally, I think it should read "as Nancy is ready for this, due to the heavy skeptical discussions on earthchanges ning and GLP, which she and her followers frequently monitor." But Nancy is never going to be ready for this one...too much history of failed predictions....)
Now, let's look at some fair usage quotes from ZetaTalk, for the purpose of discussion, critique, and education:
"This ZetaTalk [referring to the Christmas Hammer], written in late December, 2007 indeed describes what the holographic presentation that Nancy attended in November, 2009 was intending to relay. We have confirmed that some of these incidents will be part of a movement to the 7 of 10 stage, and by the end of 2010."
Q: What will be the biggest event of the year 2010 A.D?
ZT: One of the events that was presented in the holographic presentation that Nancy attended last November will surely occur. Just what else might occur, or which of these events we are referring to, we cannot say."
ZetaTalk Response 3/27/2010: The holographic presentation that Nancy attended last November included a rolling of the S American Plate with mountain building in the Andes and crushing of a part of the Caribbean Plate during this roll. We are not allowed to state when such a process might start, though there is much speculation because of the Chile quake and subsequent quakes that are running up and down the Andes, and restlessness in the Caribbean. Beyond the fact that we have confirmed this holographic presentation to be valid, in the steps it relayed, and beyond stating that to move to a 7 of 10 one or more of these described catastrophe's must happen, we can say no more.
ZetaTalk Comment 2/27/2010: As we mentioned during past chats, there will be no question when the Earth has arrived at a 7. This will not be a single quake or a series of quakes, it will be plate movements that are strong enough, significant enough, that shock would be the word to use in describing the reaction of the populace.
Can everyone see the obvious contradiction between current Nancy/ZT and prior ZetaTalk? Let me lay it all out on the table so no one misunderstands or deludes themself, because memory can be hazy:
The movement to a "7" of 10 on the Nancy/ZT scale involves the movement of tectonic plates. For a tectonic plate to move, believe me the news outlets won't be needed. Cities and coastlines will disappear, oceans will roll over islands, land masses will rise, others will sink, families, friends, and businesses will be burning the phone lines and the internet with the news, you get the idea. There is no way an event of this magnitude could be covered up. And if, for the sake of argument, the PTB were able to hide the fact a tectonic plate moved, how then would the world be "shocked"?
This is backpedaling in the extreme, playing on hazy memories and/or laziness in verifying prior ZT. The language in prior Zetatalk is abundantly clear. There were no wriggle words like "around" the end of 2010 or that "the PTB wlll hide the fact of a tectonic plate shifting," as you can see for yourself above.
And the bald-faced spin she's putting on it now. How, pray tell, would the movement to a "7" not be as "expected by many" when it was clearly stated, in no uncertain terms, that this event would be:
by the end of 2010 (a firm date that means "no later than the end of 2010." It does not include time in 2011 otherwise the phrase would have been "around the end of 2010" and/or "early 2011).
one or more (you can't hide one plate shifting, imagine trying to hide 2 or more, but at least one would happen, not "start to happen")
of the events depicted in the [holographic] presentation (which was all about tectonic plates shifting...major, major events)
SHOCKING the world (meaning the world "WILL BE SHOCKED"...not "NOT SHOCKED because the PTB-controlled news media is gagged from talking about it" (while Nancy rides in the ticker-tape parade in her mind for her grand non-performance, smiling serenely and waving to her international fans, receiving heads of states who travel the world to congratulate her for predicting nothing).
You can see what Nancy's ZT said THEN and what she is saying NOW are clearly contradictory. Past ZT did not say it was subject to change. The language was an emphatic, focused, statement with no modifiers that would have changed the meaning from certainty to maybe. The words were plain, common, English words that did not leave anything open to doubt or other interpretation. No double entendres. No guessing at what the language might be saying. It was plain and clear. And that is how we ALL interpreted the plain, common meaning of the words. Did anyone here who read it back then interpret it any differently or have any doubts as to what was being said?
Now, to state the obvious...if Nancy/ZT says black is black and later she does an about-face and claims that we all misunderstood and that black is really white, how can anyone ever again believe anything that comes out of her mouth? If you do, you are a fool. If she is allowed to get away with this, she can say whatever she wishes and then erase the blackboard and rewrite it.
For example, "It's going to rain tomorrow, no doubt about it." Tomorrow comes. You wear your raincoat and take your umbrella. The sun is out all day long. No rain. So then you question the weatherman, who says, "You, the audience, misunderstood. What was meant was that tomorrow would begin a period of time in which rain could start developing."
How could anyone have gotten the revised meaning from the first statement? You couldn't because it didn't say that. And how long would people listen to a weather forecaster like that? Not long because the incorrect information caused you to act inappropriately (in this case by dressing for rain when there was no rain after being told that it would rain for sure). Bottom line, this means that her utterances are absolutely worthless and a waste of precious time.
But, let's give credit where credit is due. She's a showman, akin to the traveling shows of the '20s and '30s...smoke and mirrors and pony shows. All show, no substance. However, her fantasy did its intended job of creating fear and interest. It scared people. It fascinated people. It drew people in to hang on her coattails for more words of wisdom from the Great Oracle. She had an audience, at least for a little while longer.
But now it's time to pay the piper for another Great White Lie. This is why the benevolent Zs are no longer with her. They are horrified at her fairy tales in their name. And ticked off, I sense. They don't zap her because they are benevolent and also because they cannot interfere. However, they have withdrawn their healing mercies. She's on her own, as far as they are concerned.
This backpedaling means she already knows 7 ain't gonna happen by the end of 2010 and she is trying to save her sorry a...reputation. If she truly cared about her followers, she could at least have the decency to tell them the truth. But the show is not about decency, the show is about her and her ego. Madame Emissary has been fired. She no longer represents the benevolent Zetas.
Responding to questions/comments:
What made the zeta's not respond to her? Fame went to her head and she wasn't getting enough information to keep her weekly newsletter going so she started inventing things to keep it alive.
When did they stop contacting her? I'm not certain, but sense in the last year or two.
And how much of ZT is really ZT and not NT? That is a good question. The only way we can tell is to see what earlier ZT said and compare it with what is being said now. For instance, the Zetas are forbidden to give timelines. This is well-known and was stated over and over again. Suddenly, this year, she has given several. The Zetas did not give her these dates and, thus, her predictions have failed.
...[t]rust your own beliefs as to what is true or not. There is no requirement to believe anything I say. What I say is my reality. You should know by now that I expect everyone here to challenge and inquire and not accept information without proof. Sometimes you do have to go with your gut feeling when proof is impossible to get (like with me and the Zetas, as they keep a strict element of doubt in place and keep me wondering and questioning), but that should be a personal decision that only you can make. Never let someone else make it for you.
Remember, as the Zetas have indicated to me, the point of ZT was to make people aware of the problem and how to prepare for it. The science was interesting and it attracted people, but the science became "god" and spun out of control. The Zetas simply want people to understand a problem exists and that they need to prepare for it, if after reviewing the information that is what they decide to do. To attract people is good but they need to move on to the preparation phase. Instead, too many people are getting stuck living on the website for the glory of one. Why? To keep an ego pampered and to provide fodder to keep ZetaTalk alive. Without the audience, there is no "ZetaTalk." [Not that it's their communications anymore, anyway.]
They also are shaking their heads at the repressiveness and shudder because people think that is how they are. Not true. Not the healing Zetas. They want people to learn, and they know people learn best in an atmosphere of love and caring. Again, that is part of the problem...their advice is not being followed. They understand the concept of "guilt by association," thus they have cut ties with her.
Is she working for the STS? I don't know. All they will say on that question is to observe her actions and behavior and judge for ourselves. I have noted that she uses the ZT "distracted STO can be gruff" as a justifier for her behavior. However, from personal observation, it goes beyond being a merely "distracted, gruff STO." STOs are STO because they love, so here is a good basis of comparison: Love is patient and kind, love is not envious, not proud, but gentle and meek, seeks not its own way... and where love lives THERE IS NO FEAR!
Responding to an earlier comment about the "white lie":
The healing Zetas state that there is no such thing as a "white lie" in their culture. They are all telepathic and the very concept of a white lie is so alien to them they could have never suggested such a thing. In 4D honesty is a way of life. You depend on the guy next to you. Someone's in trouble, they all know it...instantly. Who can lie in an evironment such as that?
So, they knew then what they were dealing with but chose to let it continue because their bottom line was still being met...the message was getting out. However, the tide has turned. Her lies are hurting the message now. A lie is a lie is a lie is a lie, no matter how you try to whitewash it.
And to let you all know, they intervened when her lies were going to harm someone. They wouldn't let that happen because they felt responsible for allowing her to continue. It was a compromise, they know. They did the best the could with a bad situation. They also want you to know that they are constantly working behind the scenes, walking a very fine line all the time to make many, many things work.
They gave permission to share this with you all:
You know how she has said they put images in her head and she was expected to put words to them? Well, news break...while I have question and answer periods with them, in English in my head, they also "autotransfer" (for lack of a better word) what they want me to know (and sometimes publish). Remember, about 9 months ago I talked about undergoing "surgery" in the True Confessions blog where they were bequeathing Zeta DNA to me and inserting it into my brain? Well, that was the "hard wiring." They intentionally built in a firewall so I don't tap into the overall "network" (which includes a certain Dutchman, since he got the same hard wiring, whether he wants to believe it any longer or not).
I don't get images for which I must guess the verbal significances so I can describe something. I get completely formed thoughts that come from "out of the blue." There is total certainty attached to these thoughts, just like they were my own thoughts. I've learned to distinguish these thoughts from my own stream of consciousness. The word is claircognizance, I believe.
I've said all I can say for now; however, in closing I got a rather amused smile when they primly pointed out that their technology hasn't changed in 15 years. If you know what they mean.
UPDATE 12/20/2010 #2
More on comparing pre-2003 ZT with current ZT and practices....
I found this article interesting, http://zetatalk.com/transfor/t131.htm, on Repressive Control. In it, the Zetas are frowning upon the practice of spying. That was in 2002. Over the past week or so, we had no less than 16 PS ning mods/spies (and Gerard and Nancy) on this site crawling all over this blog and Alesiah's Red Flag blog and Sonny's Two Suns blog, as well as our profiles.
Those of us from their ning know that they aren't here for friendly visits. They engage in plain, old Earth disinfo and spy crap to try to learn what we are saying, and who is saying what and most likely spin it or use it to discredit us. Their very presence here is highly suggestive that the Zetas are not helping them in these endeavors. And we have heard that the environment over there is getting more repressive with the institution of two-mod approvals on all blogs. What are they afraid of? Us? We simply don't care what goes on over there.
This is an example of what I am talking about ...the difference between old ZT and new. The Zetas in 2002 were frowning on the Bush administration spying, yet here is Nancy & Co. spying on this ning. Why do they need to spy? Why aren't the Zetas helping them if we are the enemy?
I hope they don't say these are schoolhouse lessons. That's too lame. Schoolhouse lessons are spiritual lessons designed to get us out of 3rd density, not learn how to act like big government and keep us stuck here.
As usual, it's a big "whatever" because this ning is protected.
UPDATE 12/20/2010 #3
Another tell-tale article at http://zetatalk.com/index/zeta262.htm, is When Lies Fail. There's no denying the earth changes. That's not the focus. The focus is on some of the comments made about the government's attempts at cover-up and disinformation. These are equally applicable to what's been going on with "Zetatalk" of late:
"When the cover-ups on the alien presence and the approach of Planet X first started, back in the days of Roswell, this was to be primarily supression of information, along with some fear inducing disinformation to keep people from pursuing the matter.
[People are banned for being here and our existence is totally repressed on the other ning.]
"Lies come with many faces. Some are lies of omission, where the truth is simply avoided, not discussed, omitted from reports or TV documentaries, with the expectation that the public, deemed to be sheep, will not notice. They did not expect the Atlantic Rift to be grabbed, regularly, by Planet X, on a daily basis. Thus we have a complete avoidance of the periodic global shuddering, evident on the live seismographs, worldwide, at regular and predictable times during the daily rotation of the globe. Since there is no explanation possible, outside of the presence of a rogue planet in the inner solar system, parked near the Sun, the issue is avoided, utterly.
[Saw this frequently on GLP and have heard it happens on the other ning as well.]
"The public, when asking why __________, is told they are in error.
"To belittle the questioner is a common technique, when the question cannot be answered.
[Sound familiar? I've seen it enough.]
"If what is to be hidden is too obvious, then a lie of commission occurs, where it is called something other than what it is.
[Like the UFOs out by the sun...one in particular was called "Planet X." Reflections off of them are called "Second Sun Sightings."]
"When you simply can't hide the evidence, or explain it with scientific mumbo jumbo, what to do? What tacks might the establishment take, to blunt the truth from the public's eye? If the excuses they have proffered are wearing thin, they can hope to supplant the truth with new Pied Pipers. Someone with alternative theories, along the lines of the many made-for-TV movies produced lately, to catch the imagination of the public and lead them anywhere but to the presence of Planet X."
[According to recent ZT, when a tectonic plate or two move the PTB just won't let the news media announce it, as if that would "hide the evidence"? No, they "simply can't hide the evidence" as ZT stated back in 2006. And they certainly can't call it something other than it is...what, the UFO's beamed South America aboard? Further, by calling the UFO's something other than they are, "ZT" is leading the public to anywhere but to the presence of UFOs and the imminent alien discloure.]
Think of these quotes in terms of the "ZT" (instead of the government). Do some of these things sound familiar? More evidence that ZT is acting more like the government than benign aliens here to help. And if they are acting suspiciously like our government, then they must be working for our government. If it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, it must be....
UPDATE 12/20/2010 #4
More changing ZT...
Even ZT states that the future isn't written in stone. http://www.zetatalk.com/transfor/t19.htm (09/15/1999).
"We will reiterate here that the future is not written, and such visions are always just possible scenarios."
[Remember I mentioned that the holographic presentation was one of several scenarios? Well, I just found this ZT confirming that statement. Also, it is known in quantum physics that thought precedes matter. Think about it...God said, "Let there be light" and there was light. Consciousness effects change. The Zetas are quite aware of these principles. They, too, know that the future is not written in stone and that there are positive forces that can alter the future. That's why they are here!]
Now, fast forward to 2003 and contrast 1999 Zetatalk with this: http://www.zetatalk.com/poleshft/p174.htm (Wishful Thinking, 02/15/2003):
"Thus, New Age talk about the world evading the pole shift if all hold hands and fervently wish it to be so, or if all change their ways and become Service-to-Others overnight, are popular with these folks.... Of course, none of this will work, as we have explained.
"Of course, loving one another, and increasing this tendency, should be encouraged, but frankly most who are not spiritually mature and firmly in this orientation will find it hard to move in that direction under trying times."
[Thus, no one should try since many won't? You have heard the expression, it only takes a few to change the world. This ZT exhorts everyone to abandon spiritual and just work on physical preparations. Whoever is behind ZT is obviously anti-spiritual.]
The Zetas themselves have a religion and believe in God as expressed in http://www.zetatalk.com/worlds/w22.htm Got Religion.
"We have a religion.... We are within the One.... Each soul is in the hand of God, within God.... The pure adage to Love thy Neighbor as Thyself stands as the rule by which we guide ourselves.... Jesus was relaying a true Service-to-Other philosophy of faith, as we believe that each of us, the least included, represents a part of God, is included in God's plan, and is God's handiwork."
The Zetas would like to direct your attention to their communication called Independent Thinking @ http://www.zetatalk.com/beinghum/b68.htm, written January 15, 1997. With that said, they wish to point out that Nancy has become the "parent figure" they have spoken of, warned about, and chided over the past 15 years. To think for ourselves is what they have encouraged from the start, which is one of the reasons for this ning. Those of us who were ready to graduate have done so. They want to reassure you that you are on the right track. Consider this ning "graduate school" and carry on! Keep thinking and questioning and seeking the truth, for as the Zetas say, "This can never be wrong...." They go on to state, "In truth, the more bright student, the thinking type, leave school than stay in...." Are you wrong for being here? Not at all, they say. Only "angry professors" feel that way because it threatens the status quo.
"Each scenario included in the holographic presentation was the final outcome of a plate movement, not every minor quake or adjustment in sea level elevation along the way!"
"Earthquakes will, as we have predicted from the start of ZetaTalk, get more violent and frequent and occur in places not expecting them. Outside of the warnings that man has learned to utilize, such as screech on the radio or pets running away from home or the physical signs that those who are earthquake sensitives get, there will be no warning. This also applies to those major plate movements which we have described, and which were included in the holographic presentation given to Nancy last November, 2009. All these regions will have increasingly violent and frequent quakes, and then one day blam the plate movement we have described will occur. There may be precursor movements, slight, warning that the plate is getting ready to move. But other than that, no warning."
[So flooding, then, is not a warning sign?]
"Throughout 2009 and into 2010 we have remained at a 6, but what will constitute a 7 of 10 has been well laid out within ZetaTalk. The Zetas have stated that a 7 would be reached when something happened that would "shock the world", and confirmed that the geological changes described in the holographic presentation which Nancy attended in November (described also in Issue 178) would be "closely associated" with a move to a 7. The world has not yet been shocked, but those who follow ZetaTalk know that it will involve "one or more" of the following [tectonic events described in the holographic presentation] by the end of 2010, when arrival at a 7 has been predicted by the Zetas."