PaulK just posted this in the Videos section, but I'm making a blog to make sure everyone sees this one...
Jupiter's orbit has gone below the ecliptic over the years. Any explanations, other than a PX-type object? And the trail of dead scientists (see stevequayle.com) is the smoking gun.
This is fascinating: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjD5aayptXk&feature=player_embed.... This astrophysicist says a comet twice the size of Jupiter came through our solar system in February 2003 and that it should have devastated us and it didn't, and he has no clue why it didn't. He also said NASA hid the information.
Now, what do you think of this? If a BDS is following Elenin that closely, we should be feeling it by now, but we aren't. Well, if this astrophysicist is right, it could happen again; it could be coming and we aren't feeling it. But why aren't we feeling it? Why isn't it wreaking havoc? Could it be ET intervention? What else could it be? The astrophysicist thinks someone is watching over us. But could it be a temporary intervention for whatever reason?
Other possibilities: Could it have been a different BD in 2003 than Nibiru? Or could it have been an extraterrestrial spacecraft, rather than a BDS?
This makes the 2003 "white lie" a little bit darker, doesn't it? NASA knew but the Zetas didn't? Or are there no Zetas and ZT has been a NASA site with the purpose of distracting all along?
Discussion of this video here: http://blog.imva.info/world-affairs/elenin. Note this statement:
"The main point to understand is that if Elenin was just a normal comet it would not have the mass to generate a gravity pull that would affect the earth when the Earth swings around into alignment."
Read this entire blog, it is full of information and also reprints the two 1983 articles about Planet X.
From: John DiNardo
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 7:44:00 AM
Subject: Earthbound Planet X is Now Near Jupiter
The big earthquakes are coming very soon -- maybe in a few weeks. I am rather sure that Planet X is coming up into the Ecliptic from below the Ecliptic. It should now be shoulder-to-shoulder with Jupiter on one side of it, and the Asteroid Belt on the other side of it. Because X is being gravitationally sucked toward the Sun, this means that Planet X will be traveling over the top of the orbital paths, first, of the Asteroid Belt, then of Mars, then of Earth, then of Venus, then of Mercury, then over the top of the Sun and then back down over the orbital paths of these planets in the reverse order.
Prepare by feeling the presence of God all day, each day. He promises to protect you from this wrecking ball which He has told us is His doing, which He has told us, in ISAIAH 63, in REVELATION, etc., is His plan, to bring people to embrace His invisible presence due to sheer fear. In PROVERBS 9:10, God spoke these words through King Solomon: "Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom" (i.e. faith).
John DiNardo
{John asks others for information that they may have regarding this suspected position. He says, "I think I had detailed my reasons for this estimation in a previous email which I can look for. There are about four reasons all pointing to this position. It may even be as far as over the orbital path of the Asteroid Belt by now, and I can only surmise that from the recent changes in the jetstream patterns.}
Steve Quayle has picked this up as well: http://stevequayle.com/News.alert/11_Global/110301.alert.Planet.X.html
Fellow researchers have sent me this photo (see link below) of what appears to be a baby sun in the line-of-sight of our Sun. It is likely a comet among the comet swarm which is gravitationally captured by what NASA has termed "a probable brown dwarf star" (see 2nd link below); or this second baby sun may even be NASA's announced brown dwarf star, itself.
On the Ecliptic -- that imaginary lazy-susan in space, on which our nine planets revolve around the Sun -- visualize yourself as Earth itself on the Ecliptic with all the other planets when this brown dwarf star arises, like a porpoise, from the depths of the cosmos, below our disc-like Solar System, piercing the Ecliptic plane near the orbital path of Jupiter. When we are in some particular month of our yearly orbit, baby star X could arise on the far side of the Sun, with the Sun being in our line of sight, if X's emergent timing is right.
For the four reasons I mentioned in previous commentaries, we can be fairly certain that X is piercing the Ecliptic about now, or has even arisen over the Ecliptic by now; so, we would expect to see X superimposed -- framed in a family photo shot with the Sun -- during some specific monthwide angle of arc in our annual revolution around the Sun.
This gravitational and magnetic field-wielding wrecking ball treats us like a piece of trash in the gutter of its roadway with each cycle around its elliptical celestial racetrack -- a racetrack which stretches from billions of miles below us in deep space (at one end of its racetrack) to our Sun (at the other end of its racetrack). A twenty-million mile close pass by us is considered an astrometric duster ball. There is nothing that humankind can do to divert this thousand-earth-mass baby star from its gravitationally ordained rendezvous with our one-third-of-a-million-earth-mass Sun -- because gravity works. And, in this case, gravity sucks. Gravitation sucks neighboring masses toward one another.
Atlantis: it's "deja vu all over again." When you google Plato Timaeus Critias Atlantis you will find Plato's ancient historical records of the sinking of Atlantis, which the best (not the most) ancient historians, geologists of antiquity, and anthropologists estimate occurred around 9,000 B.C., three duster pitches ago of this brown dwarf star on a cometary orbit. A comet, by definition, returns predictably, repetitively, and punctually. Halley's comet is one of many examples of such a celestial pendulum of regular, uniform orbital periodicity. Now, since three global ruinations ago spans about 11,000 years, then two ruinations ago would have been around 5,300 B.C., a date estimated by geologists Pitman and Ryan to have been the time of the global Great Flood of Noah's day. And one global ruination ago would have been circa 1,650 B.C., when geologists estimate that perhaps the greatest volcanic caldera explosion in known history occurred: the great Santorini volcanic explosion, which eradicated the Minoan civilization in the Aegean Sea. Tree rings from that time are known to have drastically narrowed for several years, due to the blanketing of skies with volcanic ash, ash not only from Santorini, but probably from Mount Merapi, Mount Vesuvius, the Yellowstone caldera, and hundreds of other volcanoes, worldwide.
As this brown dwarf star sails over the orbital path of Mars, then of Earth, and ultimately loops over the top of our Sun, X is the smooth stone in David's sling, our Sun is David's slingshot, and God is as David. The ruination of Planet Earth is inevitable. It is inexorable.
However, as one of many who has studied the Bible and prayed the Bible from end to end, God promises everyone that they, personally and individually, will be supernaturally protected if they will consciously make themselves aware of God's constant, beckoning presence, beside them and inside them. No need even to talk TO God. Simply listen FOR God.
John DiNardo
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/119154/20110305/two-suns-mystery-image-china-chinese-scientists-astronomer-refraction-mirage.htm
http://yowusa.com/planetx/2009/planetx-2009-02a/1.shtml
There are two theories that I know of that explain the abnormally quiescent sun these past years:
"Per the Zetas, the reason for the low sunspot activity has to do with the magnetic poles of Planet X." http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue085.htm
Per John DiNardo in March 2009, "...Planet X is in a fleeting interlude in its incoming travel, wherein it is gravitationally, electrically, and electromagnetically interacting with Jupiter, Saturn, or Uranus, thus diverting its previous fire away from the Sun, but only temporarily." https://earthchanges.ning.com/profiles/blogs/solar-scorching-of-earth-soon
In the same blog, in January 2010, he said, "...the reason why the extraordinary solar hyperactivity of the past decade had recently fizzled into a period of extraordinary quiescence is because inbound/sunbound Planet X was passing below Jupiter during 2008 to 2009, resulting in an electromagnetic and gravitational flirtation between the giant X and the gas giant, Jupiter, as evidenced perhaps by the great comet collision into Jupiter on July 20th of 2009, the comet presumably being just one member of the bee swarm of Planet X's gravitationally gripped horde of celestial bodies."
{Just from some research I did for John, another shred of evidence arose concerning the escalating rate (since 2001) of water main breakages which rate decreased in 2009, another indication that PX was "doing something different" that year.}
So, just within my knowledge (meaning there may be other theories I am unaware of), there are two schools of thought. One is that PX was actively hosing the sun with particles from its N Pole (thus, the sun's quiescent was caused by action on PX's part) and the other theory is that PX turned its affections away from the sun and directed them toward Jupiter, Saturn, or Uranus (the sun's quiescence was caused by inaction on PX's part, i.e., it not interacting with the sun).
My first question is...could a planet (albeit a brown dwarf, heavily magnetic and allegedly four times the size of Earth and 23 times its mass) affect the Sun that much? Here is a perspective of the size differences....
{I reworked the questions in the next section after posting this...for those who may have already read this blog...}
Second question concerns absorbing magnetic particles...
"Now the magnetic N Pole of Planet X is pointed outward, as Planet X has risen to the Ecliptic and is into its first 270° roll. Thus, it is pointing its magnetic S Pole toward the Sun, which absorbs magnetic particles and thus has a quieting effect." http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta459.htm
Can a planet that size actually shoot enough magnetic particles at the Sun the size of ours to calm it? Looking at the comparison images above, that just doesn't make sense to me, that Planet X could affect the Sun like that. And, another question, does shooting magnetic particles at the Sun even have a calming effect? Also, what about PX's N pole? It was pointed at the Sun too at some part of its journey. They say it is magnetic, like the S pole. So why only the S pole particles having a quieting effect? In any event, if PX was shooting magnetic particles at the Sun, it would only hit a small area at best. How would that affect the entire Sun? I think John DiNardo's theory makes more sense. What do you think?
A third theory surfaced after I wrote this. Take a look at the picture here https://earthchanges.ning.com/profiles/blogs/that-winged-thingy-againwith. Since Planet X (brown dwarf) entered our solar system in 2003 and since the "winged thingy" (an artificial vehicle aka "UFO") was captured shooting a beam at the sun, this solar period's quiescent certainly could have been influenced by help from our friends "out there." I think that John's theory about 2009 being "more quiet" is also valid. So, these two theories (UFO help + PX being turned away from the sun temporarily) are the most credible theories.
